World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 57 3887 3777 1839 1773 205 11265

Tien N. Nguyen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tien N. Nguyen between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tien N. Nguyen published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2024. 38 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2024. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 12 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 18 publications
2001 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tien N. Nguyen: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 12
2004 12
2005 11
2006 13
2007 8
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 9
2012 16
2013 13
2014 12
2015 13
2016 10
2017 13
2018 9
2019 11
2020 9
2021 4
2022 19
2023 19
2024 20
2025 18
Total 275
Download as CSV

Tien N. Nguyen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tien N. Nguyen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 205 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 205
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Tien N. Nguyen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tien N. Nguyen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458 57
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tien N. Nguyen is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on software engineering and related subfields.

The researcher's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science

Within this area, Tien N. Nguyen's work covers various subfields such as:

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Economics and Econometrics

Their research topics are diverse, with an emphasis on software engineering and system performance. Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Market Dynamics and Volatility

Tien N. Nguyen has contributed to several journals and conferences, frequently publishing in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.
  • Knowable Magazine
  • Finance research letters
  • Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

Their notable recent publications include:

  • "DEAR," 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • "Building a sustainable future: The role of corporate social responsibility in climate policy uncertainty management," 2023, Finance research letters
  • "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFLUENCER MARKETING AND PURCHASE INTENTION: FOCUSING ON VIETNAMESE GEN Z CONSUMERS," 2022, Independent Journal of Management & Production
  • "Fault localization to detect co-change fixing locations," 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • "Secukinumab in United States Biologic-Naïve Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled CHOICE Study," 2022, The Journal of Rheumatology

The researcher collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Shaohua Wang
  • Yi Li
  • Aashish Yadavally
  • Nghi D. Q. Bui
  • Vu Nguyen

Best Publications

  • Vulnerability detection with fine-grained interpretations

    Yi Li;Shaohua Wang;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Secure network file access control system

    Duc Pham;Tien Nguyen;Mingchen Lo;Pu Zhang

  • Boa: a language and infrastructure for analyzing ultra-large-scale software repositories

    Robert Dyer;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Hridesh Rajan;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Graph-based mining of multiple object usage patterns

    Tung Thanh Nguyen;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Nam H. Pham;Jafar M. Al-Kofahi

  • A C/C++ Code Vulnerability Dataset with Code Changes and CVE Summaries

    Jiahao Fan;Yi Li;Shaohua Wang;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Secure file system server architecture and methods

    Mingchen Lo;Tien Nguyen;Duc Pham;Pu Zhang

  • Duplicate bug report detection with a combination of information retrieval and topic modeling

    Anh Tuan Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Tien N. Nguyen;David Lo

  • A statistical semantic language model for source code

    Tung Thanh Nguyen;Anh Tuan Nguyen;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tien N. Nguyen

  • A topic-based approach for narrowing the search space of buggy files from a bug report

    Anh Tuan Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Jafar Al-Kofahi;Hung Viet Nguyen

  • A graph-based approach to API usage adaptation

    Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Gary Wilson;Anh Tuan Nguyen

  • Combining Deep Learning with Information Retrieval to Localize Buggy Files for Bug Reports (N)

    An Ngoc Lam;Anh Tuan Nguyen;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Fuzzy set and cache-based approach for bug triaging

    Ahmed Tamrawi;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Jafar M. Al-Kofahi;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Bug localization with combination of deep learning and information retrieval

    An Ngoc Lam;Anh Tuan Nguyen;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tien N. Nguyen

  • System and methods of cooperatively load-balancing clustered servers

    Tien Nguyen;Duc Pham;Pu Zhang;Peter Tsai

  • Graph-based statistical language model for code

    Anh Tuan Nguyen;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Secure cluster configuration data set transfer protocol

    Pu Zhang;Duc Pham;Tien Nguyen;Peter Tsai

  • API code recommendation using statistical learning from fine-grained changes

    Anh Tuan Nguyen;Michael Hilton;Mihai Codoban;Hoan Anh Nguyen

  • DLFix: context-based code transformation learning for automated program repair

    Yi Li;Shaohua Wang;Tien N. Nguyen

  • Complete and accurate clone detection in graph-based models

    Nam H. Pham;Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Jafar M. Al-Kofahi

  • Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model

    Xin Xia;David Lo;Ying Ding;Jafar M. Al-Kofahi

Frequent Co-Authors

Hoan Anh Nguyen
Hoan Anh Nguyen Iowa State University
Christian Kästner
Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University
Danny Dig
Danny Dig University of Colorado Boulder
Ralph E. Johnson
Ralph E. Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mira Mezini
Mira Mezini Technical University of Darmstadt
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Krzysztof Czarnecki University of Waterloo
Patrick Heymans
Patrick Heymans University of Namur
Jonathan I. Maletic
Jonathan I. Maletic Kent State University
Dietmar Jannach
Dietmar Jannach University of Klagenfurt
David Lo
David Lo Singapore Management University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science is more convenient than ever. Many cheap online colleges now offer accredited computer science degrees, allowing students to earn their credentials at a fraction of traditional costs. This makes the field accessible, regardless of your financial background.

If you’re concerned about your past academic performance, there are also online graduate schools with low gpa requirements. These programs provide a second chance for learners to advance in computer science or related fields without the stress of high admission benchmarks.

Besides computer science, interdisciplinary careers are increasingly valued. For example, pairing tech skills with environmental science opens doors to high-paying jobs with environmental science degree foundations, such as data analysis or environmental modeling.

Looking to fast-track your career? Consider an accelerated computer science degree to enter the tech workforce sooner. Flexible online learning paths make it possible to align your education with your professional ambitions, no matter where you start.

Best Scientists Citing Tien N. Nguyen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles