World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 44 7542 7323 3280 3155 118 8595

Miryung Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miryung Kim between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miryung Kim published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2020. 10 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2020. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 3 publications
2004 2026

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miryung Kim: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 1
2009 1
2010 8
2011 7
2012 10
2013 7
2014 6
2015 3
2016 12
2017 5
2018 12
2019 7
2020 16
2021 8
2022 7
2023 5
2024 9
2025 7
2026 3
Total 143
Download as CSV

Miryung Kim publications per year - data summary

  • Miryung Kim, a Computer Science scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, has 143 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2008 and 2009, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.2 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 31 publications, 22% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 26 publications (3.3 per year); 2012-2019: 62 publications (7.8 per year); 2020-2026: 55 publications (7.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Miryung Kim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miryung Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 118
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Miryung Kim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Miryung Kim, a Computer Science scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, records 118 publications - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Miryung Kim, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Miryung Kim ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Miryung Kim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miryung Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 44
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Miryung Kim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Miryung Kim, a Computer Science scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, records 44 D-Index - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Miryung Kim, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Miryung Kim falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Miryung Kim is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily within the field of Computer Science, with a specific focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Software, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's main research topics include Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques.

Miryung Kim has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • QDiff: Differential Testing of Quantum Software Stacks (2021), presented at the 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • A Declarative Metamorphic Testing Framework for Autonomous Driving (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Dorylus: Affordable, Scalable, and Accurate GNN Training with Distributed CPU Servers and Serverless Threads (2021), available on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Models (2020), available on arXiv (Cornell University)

The researcher has appeared frequently in publication venues such as arXiv from Cornell University, Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Miryung Kim include:

  • Muhammad Ali Gulzar
  • Hong Jin Kang
  • Guoqing Xu
  • Xi Zheng
  • Yifan Qiao

In recognition of their contributions, Miryung Kim was awarded the ACM Senior Member designation in 2016.

Best Publications

  • An empirical study of code clone genealogies

    Miryung Kim;Vibha Sazawal;David Notkin;Gail Murphy

  • Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems

    Nanette Brown;Yuanfang Cai;Yuepu Guo;Rick Kazman

  • An ethnographic study of copy and paste programming practices in OOPL

    Miryung Kim;L. Bergman;T. Lau;D. Notkin

  • An Empirical Study of API Stability and Adoption in the Android Ecosystem

    Tyler McDonnell;Baishakhi Ray;Miryung Kim

  • A field study of refactoring challenges and benefits

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Nachiappan Nagappan

  • Template-based reconstruction of complex refactorings

    Kyle Prete;Napol Rachatasumrit;Nikita Sudan;Miryung Kim

  • The emerging role of data scientists on software development teams

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • Discovering and representing systematic code changes

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin

  • An Empirical Study of RefactoringChallenges and Benefits at Microsoft

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Nachiappan Nagappan

  • LASE: locating and applying systematic edits by learning from examples

    Na Meng;Miryung Kim;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Data Scientists in Software Teams: State of the Art and Challenges

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • A graph-based approach to API usage adaptation

    Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Gary Wilson;Anh Tuan Nguyen

  • AURA: a hybrid approach to identify framework evolution

    Wei Wu;Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc;Giuliano Antoniol;Miryung Kim

  • Automatic Inference of Structural Changes for Matching across Program Versions

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin;Dan Grossman

  • An empirical investigation into the role of API-level refactorings during software evolution

    Miryung Kim;Dongxiang Cai;Sunghun Kim

  • Ref-Finder: a refactoring reconstruction tool based on logic query templates

    Miryung Kim;Matthew Gee;Alex Loh;Napol Rachatasumrit

  • Are code examples on an online Q&A forum reliable?: a study of API misuse on stack overflow

    Tianyi Zhang;Ganesha Upadhyaya;Anastasia Reinhardt;Hridesh Rajan

  • Detecting software modularity violations

    Sunny Wong;Yuanfang Cai;Miryung Kim;Michael Dalton

  • Systematic editing: generating program transformations from an example

    Na Meng;Miryung Kim;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Program element matching for multi-version program analyses

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin

  • An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Models

    Yao Deng;Xi Zheng;Tianyi Zhang;Chen Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Zimmermann
Thomas Zimmermann Microsoft (United States)
David Notkin
David Notkin University of Washington
Sarfraz Khurshid
Sarfraz Khurshid The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew Begel
Andrew Begel Carnegie Mellon University
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
Xi Zheng
Xi Zheng Macquarie University
Todd Millstein
Todd Millstein University of California, Los Angeles
Baishakhi Ray
Baishakhi Ray Columbia University
Kathryn S. McKinley
Kathryn S. McKinley Google (United States)
Nachiappan Nagappan
Nachiappan Nagappan Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees provides flexible options for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. If you want to fast-track your studies, an accelerated cs degree can help you earn credentials and enter the workforce quickly.

Those passionate about environmental solutions can consider the environmental engineering degree online, which combines technical skills with sustainability-focused coursework. This is ideal for students who want to address ecological challenges through engineering.

Engineering-minded students on a budget may be interested in the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online, offering a cost-effective path to a respected profession with strong job prospects.

For those intrigued by the laws of the universe, the cheapest online physics degree makes advanced study in physics more affordable and accessible.

Each of these online programs unlocks a variety of career pathways, giving students the skills needed to adapt and thrive in rapidly-evolving tech and engineering industries.

Best Scientists Citing Miryung Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles