World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8595
World Ranking
7543
National Ranking
3280

Miryung Kim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miryung Kim sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Miryung Kim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miryung Kim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Miryung Kim is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily within the field of Computer Science, with a specific focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Software, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's main research topics include Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques.

Miryung Kim has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • QDiff: Differential Testing of Quantum Software Stacks (2021), presented at the 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • A Declarative Metamorphic Testing Framework for Autonomous Driving (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Dorylus: Affordable, Scalable, and Accurate GNN Training with Distributed CPU Servers and Serverless Threads (2021), available on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Models (2020), available on arXiv (Cornell University)

The researcher has appeared frequently in publication venues such as arXiv from Cornell University, Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Miryung Kim include:

  • Muhammad Ali Gulzar
  • Hong Jin Kang
  • Guoqing Xu
  • Xi Zheng
  • Yifan Qiao

In recognition of their contributions, Miryung Kim was awarded the ACM Senior Member designation in 2016.

Best Publications

  • An empirical study of code clone genealogies

    Miryung Kim;Vibha Sazawal;David Notkin;Gail Murphy

  • Managing technical debt in software-reliant systems

    Nanette Brown;Yuanfang Cai;Yuepu Guo;Rick Kazman

  • An ethnographic study of copy and paste programming practices in OOPL

    Miryung Kim;L. Bergman;T. Lau;D. Notkin

  • An Empirical Study of API Stability and Adoption in the Android Ecosystem

    Tyler McDonnell;Baishakhi Ray;Miryung Kim

  • A field study of refactoring challenges and benefits

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Nachiappan Nagappan

  • Template-based reconstruction of complex refactorings

    Kyle Prete;Napol Rachatasumrit;Nikita Sudan;Miryung Kim

  • The emerging role of data scientists on software development teams

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • Discovering and representing systematic code changes

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin

  • An Empirical Study of RefactoringChallenges and Benefits at Microsoft

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Nachiappan Nagappan

  • LASE: locating and applying systematic edits by learning from examples

    Na Meng;Miryung Kim;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Data Scientists in Software Teams: State of the Art and Challenges

    Miryung Kim;Thomas Zimmermann;Robert DeLine;Andrew Begel

  • A graph-based approach to API usage adaptation

    Hoan Anh Nguyen;Tung Thanh Nguyen;Gary Wilson;Anh Tuan Nguyen

  • AURA: a hybrid approach to identify framework evolution

    Wei Wu;Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc;Giuliano Antoniol;Miryung Kim

  • Automatic Inference of Structural Changes for Matching across Program Versions

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin;Dan Grossman

  • An empirical investigation into the role of API-level refactorings during software evolution

    Miryung Kim;Dongxiang Cai;Sunghun Kim

  • Ref-Finder: a refactoring reconstruction tool based on logic query templates

    Miryung Kim;Matthew Gee;Alex Loh;Napol Rachatasumrit

  • Are code examples on an online Q&A forum reliable?: a study of API misuse on stack overflow

    Tianyi Zhang;Ganesha Upadhyaya;Anastasia Reinhardt;Hridesh Rajan

  • Detecting software modularity violations

    Sunny Wong;Yuanfang Cai;Miryung Kim;Michael Dalton

  • Systematic editing: generating program transformations from an example

    Na Meng;Miryung Kim;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Program element matching for multi-version program analyses

    Miryung Kim;David Notkin

  • An Analysis of Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Autonomous Driving Models

    Yao Deng;Xi Zheng;Tianyi Zhang;Chen Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Zimmermann
Thomas Zimmermann Microsoft (United States)
David Notkin
David Notkin University of Washington
Sarfraz Khurshid
Sarfraz Khurshid The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew Begel
Andrew Begel Carnegie Mellon University
Robert DeLine
Robert DeLine Microsoft (United States)
Xi Zheng
Xi Zheng Macquarie University
Todd Millstein
Todd Millstein University of California, Los Angeles
Baishakhi Ray
Baishakhi Ray Columbia University
Kathryn S. McKinley
Kathryn S. McKinley Google (United States)
Nachiappan Nagappan
Nachiappan Nagappan Facebook (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees provides flexible options for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. If you want to fast-track your studies, an accelerated cs degree can help you earn credentials and enter the workforce quickly.

Those passionate about environmental solutions can consider the environmental engineering degree online, which combines technical skills with sustainability-focused coursework. This is ideal for students who want to address ecological challenges through engineering.

Engineering-minded students on a budget may be interested in the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online, offering a cost-effective path to a respected profession with strong job prospects.

For those intrigued by the laws of the universe, the cheapest online physics degree makes advanced study in physics more affordable and accessible.

Each of these online programs unlocks a variety of career pathways, giving students the skills needed to adapt and thrive in rapidly-evolving tech and engineering industries.

Best Scientists Citing Miryung Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles