World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
71
Citations
17658
World Ranking
1794
National Ranking
907

Kathryn S. McKinley publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn S. McKinley sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 250 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kathryn S. McKinley D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn S. McKinley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to compiler technologies
  • 2008 - ACM Fellow For contributions to compilers and memory management.
  • 2006 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2006 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Kathryn S. McKinley is affiliated with Google in the United States and works primarily in the field of computer science. Their research covers a range of subfields including computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, general health professions, computer vision and pattern recognition, and artificial intelligence.

Their work often centers on topics such as parallel computing and optimization techniques, distributed and parallel computing systems, cloud computing and resource management, graph theory and algorithms, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, clinical practice guidelines implementation, and health policy implementation science.

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • Combining Machine Learning and Lifetime-Based Resource Management for Memory Allocation and Beyond, 2024, Communications of the ACM
  • Workshop on Quantification, Communication, and Interpretation of Uncertainty in Simulation and Data Science, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Acute post-stroke aphasia management: An implementation science study protocol using a behavioural approach to support practice change, 2022, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • Combining Machine Learning and Lifetime-Based Resource Management for Memory Allocation and Beyond, 2024, UNC Libraries
  • LAVA: Lifetime-Aware VM Allocation with Learned Distributions and Adaptation to Mispredictions, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Martin Maas, David G. Andersen, Michael Isard, Mohammad Mahdi Javanmard, and Colin Raffel.

McKinley's research has been published repeatedly in venues such as Communications of the ACM, arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, and UNC Libraries.

The scientist has been recognized with several professional distinctions including IEEE Fellow in 2011 for contributions to compiler technologies, ACM Fellow in 2008 for contributions to compilers and memory management, ACM Senior Member in 2006, and ACM Distinguished Member in 2006.

Best Publications

  • The DaCapo benchmarks: java benchmarking development and analysis

    Stephen M. Blackburn;Robin Garner;Chris Hoffmann;Asjad M. Khang

  • Improving data locality with loop transformations

    Kathryn S. McKinley;Steve Carr;Chau-Wen Tseng

  • Hoard: a scalable memory allocator for multithreaded applications

    Emery D. Berger;Kathryn S. McKinley;Robert D. Blumofe;Paul R. Wilson

  • Tile size selection using cache organization and data layout

    Stephanie Coleman;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Scaling to the end of silicon with EDGE architectures

    D. Burger;S.W. Keckler;K.S. McKinley;M. Dahlin

  • Compiler optimizations for improving data locality

    Steve Carr;Kathryn S. McKinley;Chau-Wen Tseng

  • Maximizing Loop Parallelism and Improving Data Locality via Loop Fusion and Distribution

    Ken Kennedy;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • The Jikes research virtual machine project: building an open-source research community

    B. Alpern;S. Augart;S. M. Blackburn;M. Butrico

  • Myths and realities: the performance impact of garbage collection

    Stephen M. Blackburn;Perry Cheng;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • PACER: proportional detection of data races

    Michael D. Bond;Katherine E. Coons;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Oil and water? High performance garbage collection in Java with MMTk

    Stephen M. Blackburn;Perry Cheng;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Reconsidering custom memory allocation

    Emery D. Berger;Benjamin G. Zorn;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Type-based alias analysis

    Amer Diwan;Kathryn S. McKinley;J. Eliot B. Moss

  • LASE: locating and applying systematic edits by learning from examples

    Na Meng;Miryung Kim;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Dynamic software updates: a VM-centric approach

    Suriya Subramanian;Michael Hicks;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Optimizing for parallelism and data locality

    Ken Kennedy;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Laminar: practical fine-grained decentralized information flow control

    Indrajit Roy;Donald E. Porter;Michael D. Bond;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Data Flow Analysis for Software Prefetching Linked Data Structures in Java

    Brendon Cahoon;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • OOPSLA 2002: Reconsidering custom memory allocation

    Emery D. Berger;Benjamin G. Zorn;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • Composing high-performance memory allocators

    Emery D. Berger;Benjamin G. Zorn;Kathryn S. McKinley

  • The garbage collection advantage: improving program locality

    Xianglong Huang;Stephen M. Blackburn;Kathryn S. McKinley;J Eliot B. Moss

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen M. Blackburn
Stephen M. Blackburn Australian National University
Doug Burger
Doug Burger Microsoft (United States)
J. Eliot B. Moss
J. Eliot B. Moss University of Massachusetts Amherst
Stephen W. Keckler
Stephen W. Keckler Nvidia (United States)
Ken Kennedy
Ken Kennedy Rice University
Yuxiong He
Yuxiong He Microsoft (United States)
Emery D. Berger
Emery D. Berger University of Massachusetts Amherst
Lieven Eeckhout
Lieven Eeckhout Ghent University
Sameh Elnikety
Sameh Elnikety Microsoft (United States)
Keshav Pingali
Keshav Pingali The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. For those looking to enter the tech field quickly, easy certifications to get online can help you gain in-demand skills without a lengthy commitment. These certifications are ideal for anyone seeking fast entry into specialized jobs or wanting to supplement existing credentials.

If you're interested in advancing your education efficiently, consider the shortest masters degree programs online. These programs offer a streamlined curriculum, allowing you to earn a graduate degree in as little as a year. This flexibility is perfect for busy professionals or those eager to make a rapid career transition.

Unsure which degree will have the biggest impact? Explore the most useful masters degrees to identify pathways that provide strong ROI and align with current employer needs.

For a quicker alternative to a bachelor’s or master's degree, 1 year associate degree programs online can help kickstart your tech career. These programs are accessible, affordable, and designed for fast workforce entry or transfer to four-year universities.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn S. McKinley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles