World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
13562
World Ranking
2008
National Ranking
1013

Keshav Pingali publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keshav Pingali sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 291 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Keshav Pingali D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keshav Pingali sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2012 - ACM Fellow For contributions to data-centric parallel programming and to parallel compilation theory and practice.
  • 2010 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to compilers and parallel computing
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Keshav Pingali is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and engineering, with a focus on parallel computing, graph algorithms, and advanced computational techniques.

The scientist has contributed extensively to fields including:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their work covers subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Main topics of research include:

  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Keshav Pingali has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Maciej Paszyński
  • Roshan Dathathri
  • Gurbinder Gill
  • Marcin Łoś
  • Loc Hoang

Their publications have appeared in various venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • Computers & Mathematics with Applications
  • 2022 27th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  • IEEE Design and Test

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Pangolin", 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • "SPRoute 2.0: A detailed-routability-driven deterministic parallel global router with soft capacity", 2022, 2022 27th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)
  • "An Open-Source EDA Flow for Asynchronous Logic", 2021, IEEE Design and Test
  • "Groute", 2020, ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing
  • "Single machine graph analytics on massive datasets using Intel optane DC persistent memory", 2020, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Keshav Pingali has received several professional recognitions including:

  • Member of Academia Europaea (2020)
  • ACM Fellow (2012) for contributions to data-centric parallel programming and parallel compilation theory and practice
  • IEEE Fellow (2010) for contributions to compilers and parallel computing
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2009)

Best Publications

  • A lightweight infrastructure for graph analytics

    Donald Nguyen;Andrew Lenharth;Keshav Pingali

  • Optimistic parallelism requires abstractions

    Milind Kulkarni;Keshav Pingali;Bruce Walter;Ganesh Ramanarayanan

  • I-structures: data structures for parallel computing

    Unknown

  • A quantitative study of irregular programs on GPUs

    Martin Burtscher;Rupesh Nasre;Keshav Pingali

  • The tao of parallelism in algorithms

    Keshav Pingali;Donald Nguyen;Milind Kulkarni;Martin Burtscher

  • Process decomposition through locality of reference

    A. Rogers;K. Pingali

  • The program structure tree: computing control regions in linear time

    Richard Johnson;David Pearson;Keshav Pingali

  • Data-centric multi-level blocking

    Induprakas Kodukula;Nawaaz Ahmed;Keshav Pingali

  • Automated application-level checkpointing of MPI programs

    Greg Bronevetsky;Daniel Marques;Keshav Pingali;Paul Stodghill

  • Lonestar: A suite of parallel irregular programs

    Milind Kulkarni;Martin Burtscher;Calin Cascaval;Keshav Pingali

  • A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization

    Kamen Yotov;Xiaoming Li;Gang Ren;Michael Cibulskis

  • An Efficient CUDA Implementation of the Tree-Based Barnes Hut n-Body Algorithm

    Martin Burtscher;Keshav Pingali

  • Register renaming and dynamic speculation: an alternative approach

    Mayan Moudgill;Keshav Pingali;Stamatis Vassiliadis

  • A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization

    Unknown

  • How much parallelism is there in irregular applications

    Milind Kulkarni;Martin Burtscher;Rajeshkar Inkulu;Keshav Pingali

  • Dependence-based program analysis

    Richard Johnson;Keshav Pingali

  • Is Search Really Necessary to Generate High-Performance BLAS?

    K. Yotov;Xiaoming Li;Gang Ren;M.J.S. Garzaran

  • Application-level checkpointing for shared memory programs

    Greg Bronevetsky;Daniel Marques;Keshav Pingali;Peter Szwed

  • A Singular Loop Transformation Framework Based on Non-Singular Matrices

    Wei Li;Keshav Pingali

  • I-structures: Data structures for parallel computing

    Arvind;Rishiyur S. Nikhil;Keshav Pingali

  • Synthesizing Transformations for Locality Enhancement of Imperfectly-Nested Loop Nests

    Nawaaz Ahmed;Nikolay Mateev;Keshav Pingali

  • A load balancing framework for adaptive and asynchronous applications

    K. Barker;A. Chernikov;N. Chrisochoides;K. Pingali

Frequent Co-Authors

David Padua
David Padua University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Bruce Walter
Bruce Walter Cornell University
Kavita Bala
Kavita Bala Cornell University
Kathryn S. McKinley
Kathryn S. McKinley Google (United States)
Alexandru Nicolau
Alexandru Nicolau University of California, Irvine
Michael F. P. O'Boyle
Michael F. P. O'Boyle University of Edinburgh
Martin Schulz
Martin Schulz Technical University of Munich
Guang R. Gao
Guang R. Gao University of Delaware
Rajit Manohar
Rajit Manohar Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a flexible way to advance your education and career in Computer Science and related fields. Many students consider online affordable master's programs to gain specialized skills without a hefty price tag. These programs often provide the same rigorous curriculum as on-campus options, allowing you to study from anywhere and reduce overall costs.

For those aiming for senior leadership or academic roles, a doctorate organizational leadership online can pave the way to higher-level opportunities, especially in tech management or education administration. Similarly, pursuing an ed d degree online can help you lead in the education sector or operational strategy within tech organizations.

If you’re looking to start your career as soon as possible, consider the easiest associate degree to get online. These pathways offer a quick entry into the workforce, letting you gain practical skills and experience in less time. Each of these online options offers flexibility and accessibility, helping you align your education with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Keshav Pingali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles