World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
16402
World Ranking
1995
National Ranking
1008

David Padua publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Padua sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 285 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Padua D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Padua sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to compiler support for parallel computing.
  • 2000 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to compiler technology for parallel computing.

Overview

David Padua is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States, specializing primarily in Computer Science and Medicine. Their research focuses extensively on areas such as Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques, Interconnection Networks and Systems, and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems. Additional interests include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms, Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, Sports injuries and prevention, and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation.

Padua's work spans several subfields, including Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Surgery, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

The scientist has contributed to a number of recent publications. These include:

  • NSF/IEEE-TCPP Curriculum Initiative on Parallel and Distributed Computing Core Topics for Undergraduates, 2024, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Quadriceps Strength Does Not Associate with Gait Adaptation Ability in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, 2024, UNC Libraries
  • Message from the Organizing Committee, 2025, Indian Journal of Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Padua include:

  • Robert H. Kuhn
  • Sushil K. Prasad
  • Almadena Chtchelkanova
  • Sajal K. Das
  • Frank Dehne

Publication venues where Padua has most often published work include HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), UNC Libraries, and the Indian Journal of Psychiatry.

Among book publications, Padua is credited with a title published by Morgan & Claypool Publishers: Parallel Processing, 1980 to 2020 (2020).

Recognition for contributions in the field includes election as an ACM Fellow in 2007 for contributions to compiler support for parallel computing, as well as IEEE Fellow status awarded in 2000 for contributions to compiler technology for parallel computing.

Best Publications

  • Advanced compiler optimizations for supercomputers

    David A. Padua;Michael J. Wolfe

  • SPIRAL: Code Generation for DSP Transforms

    M. Puschel;J.M.F. Moura;J.R. Johnson;D. Padua

  • The LRPD test: speculative run-time parallelization of loops with privatization and reduction parallelization

    L. Rauchwerger;D.A. Padua

  • Dependence graphs and compiler optimizations

    D. J. Kuck;R. H. Kuhn;D. A. Padua;B. Leasure

  • Automatic array privatization

    Peng Tu;David Padua

  • Parallel programming with Polaris

    W. Blume;R. Doallo;R. Doallo;R. Doallo;R. Eigenmann;R. Eigenmann;J. Grout

  • Automatic program parallelization

    U. Banerjee;R. Eigenmann;A. Nicolau;D.A. Padua

  • An Evaluation of Vectorizing Compilers

    Saeed Maleki;Yaoqing Gao;Maria J. Garzar´n;Tommy Wong

  • SPL: a language and compiler for DSP algorithms

    Jianxin Xiong;Jeremy Johnson;Robert Johnson;David Padua

  • Spiral: A Generator for Platform-Adapted Libraries of Signal Processing Algorithms

    Markus Püschel;José M. F. Moura;Bryan Singer;Jianxin Xiong

  • Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing

    David Padua

  • Estimating cache misses and locality using stack distances

    Calin CaΒcaval;David A. Padua

  • Compiler Algorithms for Synchronization

    Samuel P. Midkiff;David A. Padua

  • A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization

    Kamen Yotov;Xiaoming Li;Gang Ren;Michael Cibulskis

  • A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization

    Unknown

  • Gated SSA-based demand-driven symbolic analysis for parallelizing compilers

    Peng Tu;David Padua

  • Is Search Really Necessary to Generate High-Performance BLAS?

    K. Yotov;Xiaoming Li;Gang Ren;M.J.S. Garzaran

  • Programming for parallelism and locality with hierarchically tiled arrays

    Ganesh Bikshandi;Jia Guo;Daniel Hoeflinger;Gheorghe Almasi

  • Experience in the Automatic Parallelization of Four Perfect-Benchmark Programs

    Rudolf Eigenmann;Jay Hoeflinger;Z. Li;David A. Padua

  • On the automatic parallelization of the Perfect Benchmarks(R)

    R. Eigenmann;J. Hoeflinger;D. Padua

  • Special Issue on Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation

    J.M.F. Moura;M. Puschel;D. Padua;J. Dongarra

  • Automatic program parallelization : Languages and compilers

    Uptal Banerjee;R. Eigenmann;A. Nicolau;D. A. Padua

Frequent Co-Authors

Rudolf Eigenmann
Rudolf Eigenmann University of Delaware
Samuel P. Midkiff
Samuel P. Midkiff Purdue University West Lafayette
Alexandru Nicolau
Alexandru Nicolau University of California, Irvine
Lawrence Rauchwerger
Lawrence Rauchwerger University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Keshav Pingali
Keshav Pingali The University of Texas at Austin
Josep Torrellas
Josep Torrellas University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David Gelernter
David Gelernter Yale University
Mary Hall
Mary Hall University of Utah
Albert Cohen
Albert Cohen Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science doesn't have to follow a single, traditional route. Today, flexible learning options make it easier to launch or advance your tech career. If you're just starting out, an online associate's degree can provide a solid foundation in coding, IT, and problem-solving—often in just two years.

For those aiming to take their careers further, identifying the most worthwhile masters degrees is crucial. A specialized master’s in computer science or related fields can open doors to leadership roles and lucrative industries such as artificial intelligence or cybersecurity.

Many students may be concerned about costs or academic requirements. Fortunately, there are affordable online degree programs available across the U.S., making higher education more accessible. In addition, if past academic performance is a concern, you can find a college that accepts low gpa applicants, providing more entry points into promising tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing David Padua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles