World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6136
World Ranking
10717
National Ranking
4478

Samuel P. Midkiff publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel P. Midkiff sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 140 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Samuel P. Midkiff D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel P. Midkiff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Samuel P. Midkiff is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their academic profile includes recognition as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2020.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues are listed in the available data. Likewise, there are no mentioned book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics detailed for this researcher.

The absence of detailed publication information and research topics makes it difficult to outline the precise scientific focus or contributions of Samuel P. Midkiff. However, their acknowledgment by the ACM suggests involvement in computing or related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Escape analysis for Java

    Jong-Deok Choi;Manish Gupta;Mauricio Serrano;Vugranam C. Sreedhar

  • SOBER: statistical model-based bug localization

    Chao Liu;Xifeng Yan;Long Fei;Jiawei Han

  • Statistical Debugging: A Hypothesis Testing-Based Approach

    Chao Liu;Long Fei;Xifeng Yan;Jiawei Han

  • What is keeping my phone awake?: characterizing and detecting no-sleep energy bugs in smartphone apps

    Abhinav Pathak;Abhilash Jindal;Y. Charlie Hu;Samuel P. Midkiff

  • Cetus: A Source-to-Source Compiler Infrastructure for Multicores

    C. Dave;Hansang Bae;Seung-Jai Min;Seyong Lee

  • Compiler Algorithms for Synchronization

    Samuel P. Midkiff;David A. Padua

  • AccMon: Automatically Detecting Memory-Related Bugs via Program Counter-Based Invariants

    Pin Zhou;Wei Liu;Long Fei;Shan Lu

  • Java programming for high-performance numerical computing

    J. E. Moreira;S. P. Midkiff;M. Gupta;P. V. Artigas

  • Stack allocation and synchronization optimizations for Java using escape analysis

    Jong-Deok Choi;Manish Gupta;Mauricio J. Serrano;Vugranam C. Sreedhar

  • Method for optimizing creation and destruction of objects in computer programs

    Jong-Deok Choi;Manish Gupta;Mauricio J. Serrano;Vugranam C. Sreedhar

  • An HPF Compiler for the IBM SP2

    Manish Gupta;Sam Midkiff;Edith Schonberg;Ven Seshadri

  • Concurrent Static Single Assignment Form and Constant Propagation for Explicitly Parallel Programs

    Jaejin Lee;Samuel P. Midkiff;David A. Padua

  • Compiler techniques for high performance sequentially consistent java programs

    Zehra Sura;Xing Fang;Chi-Leung Wong;Samuel P. Midkiff

  • Basic compiler algorithms for parallel programs

    Jaejin Lee;David A. Padua;Samuel P. Midkiff

  • Issues in the Optimization of Parallel Programs.

    Samuel P. Midkiff;David A. Padua

  • Automatic fence insertion for shared memory multiprocessing

    Xing Fang;Jaejin Lee;Samuel P. Midkiff

  • Quicksilver: a quasi-static compiler for Java

    Mauricio Serrano;Rajesh Bordawekar;Sam Midkiff;Manish Gupta

  • COMPILER GENERATED SYNCHRONIZATION FOR DO LOOPS.

    Samuel P. Midkiff;David A. Padua

  • Method for optimizing locks in computer programs

    Jong-Deok Choi;Manish Gupta;Mauricio J. Serrano;Vugranam C. Sreedhar

  • Zephyr: efficient incremental reprogramming of sensor nodes using function call indirections and difference computation

    Rajesh Krishna Panta;Saurabh Bagchi;Samuel P. Midkiff

  • From flop to megaflops: Java for technical computing

    José E. Moreira;Samuel P. Midkiff;Manish Gupta

Frequent Co-Authors

Manish Gupta
Manish Gupta Google (United States)
José E. Moreira
José E. Moreira IBM (United States)
David Padua
David Padua University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Y. Charlie Hu
Y. Charlie Hu Purdue University West Lafayette
Rudolf Eigenmann
Rudolf Eigenmann University of Delaware
Albert Cohen
Albert Cohen Google (United States)
Jong-Deok Choi
Jong-Deok Choi Samsung (South Korea)
Saurabh Bagchi
Saurabh Bagchi Purdue University West Lafayette
Marc Snir
Marc Snir University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vijay K. Naik
Vijay K. Naik IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a future in computer science, exploring online degree options and alternative career pathways is valuable. Many students are interested in practical, affordable, and quick routes to further their education or launch a successful tech career.

Those seeking value may be interested in what is the cheapest data science course in the US? This can help you find cost-effective programs while acquiring in-demand skills. For students aiming to specialize or broaden their expertise, there are numerous best online electrical engineering programs USA that offer flexibility and accredited coursework.

If fast career advancement is a priority, some may prefer options that require less time commitment. Consider easy certifications that pay well as a way to boost your qualifications and salary potential without years of study. Additionally, pursuing a quickest online masters degree can rapidly position you for senior roles or specialized fields in computer science.

Exploring these pathways can help you balance costs, speed, and career outcomes as you chart your course in the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel P. Midkiff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles