World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
R. Mark Richardson

R. Mark Richardson

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6631
World Ranking
6979
National Ranking
3010

R. Mark Richardson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Mark Richardson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

R. Mark Richardson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Mark Richardson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Mark Richardson is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has an extensive body of research in neuroscience and medicine. Their work primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience, contributing significantly to these fields.

Their research covers a variety of specialized topics, including:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Richardson has published frequently in prominent scientific venues. The most common outlets for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of Vision
  • Neurology
  • Nature Communications

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • "Large-scale neural recordings with single neuron resolution using Neuropixels probes in human cortex," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Towards network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy," 2022, Brain
  • "Lead-DBS v3.0: Mapping deep brain stimulation effects to local anatomy and global networks," 2023, NeuroImage
  • "Mapping dysfunctional circuits in the frontal cortex using deep brain stimulation," 2024, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Human visual consciousness involves large scale cortical and subcortical networks independent of task report and eye movement activity," 2022, Nature Communications

Richardson frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Sydney S. Cash
  • Alan Bush
  • Vasileios Kokkinos
  • Witold Lipski
  • Angelique C. Paulk

Their work significantly contributes to understanding brain function, neurological disorders, and neuromodulation techniques, particularly in epilepsy and Parkinson's disease contexts. The volume and diversity of Richardson's publications demonstrate a broad engagement with neuroscience research, spanning from technical innovations such as Neuropixels probes to clinical applications in deep brain stimulation.

Best Publications

  • Dual role of mitochondria in producing melatonin and driving GPCR signaling to block cytochrome c release

    Yalikun Suofu;Wei Li;Wei Li;Frédéric G. Jean-Alphonse;Jiaoying Jia

  • Large-scale neural recordings with single neuron resolution using Neuropixels probes in human cortex

    Unknown

  • Towards network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy

    Unknown

  • Neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury.

    R. Mark Richardson;Dong Sun;M. Ross Bullock

  • Lead-DBS v3.0: Mapping deep brain stimulation effects to local anatomy and global networks

    Unknown

  • Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

    Vivek Sudhakar;R. Mark Richardson

  • Dynamic encoding of face information in the human fusiform gyrus

    Avniel Singh Ghuman;Nicolas M. Brunet;Yuanning Li;Roma O. Konecky

  • Interventional MRI-guided putaminal delivery of AAV2-GDNF for a planned clinical trial in Parkinson's disease.

    R Mark Richardson;Adrian P Kells;Kathryn H Rosenbluth;Ernesto Aguilar Salegio

  • Magnetic resonance imaging-guided phase 1 trial of putaminal AADC gene therapy for Parkinson's disease.

    Chadwick W. Christine;Krystof S. Bankiewicz;Amber D. Van Laar;R. Mark Richardson

  • Differential tractography as a track-based biomarker for neuronal injury.

    Fang-Cheng Yeh;Islam M. Zaydan;Valerie R. Suski;David Lacomis

  • Association of Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation Neurophysiological Features With Seizure Control Among Patients With Focal Epilepsy.

    Vasileios Kokkinos;Vasileios Kokkinos;Nathaniel D. Sisterson;Thomas A. Wozny;R. Mark Richardson;R. Mark Richardson

  • Decoding and disrupting left midfusiform gyrus activity during word reading

    Elizabeth A. Hirshorn;Yuanning Li;Yuanning Li;Michael J. Ward;R. Mark Richardson;R. Mark Richardson

  • An optimized system for interventional magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic surgery: preliminary evaluation of targeting accuracy.

    Paul S. Larson;Philip A. Starr;Geoffrey Bates;Lisa Tansey

  • Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders

    Wolf-Julian Neumann;Robert S. Turner;Benjamin Blankertz;Tom Mitchell

  • Surgical repositioning of misplaced subthalamic electrodes in Parkinson's disease: location of effective and ineffective leads.

    R. Mark Richardson;Jill L. Ostrem;Philip A. Starr

  • Novel Platform for MRI-Guided Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Therapeutics: Preclinical Validation in Nonhuman Primate Brain

    R. Mark Richardson;Adrian P. Kells;Alastair J. Martin;Paul S. Larson

  • Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Personalized Medicine

    Nathaniel D. Sisterson;Thomas A. Wozny;Vasileios Kokkinos;Vasileios Kokkinos;Alexander Constantino

  • Responsive neurostimulation of the thalamus improves seizure control in idiopathic generalised epilepsy: initial case series

    Unknown

  • Charting the road forward in psychiatric neurosurgery: Proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery workshop on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders

    Ausaf A. Bari;Charles B. Mikell;Aviva Abosch;Sharona Ben-Haim

  • Real-time MR imaging with Gadoteridol predicts distribution of transgenes after convection-enhanced delivery of AAV2 vectors.

    Xiaomin Su;Adrian P Kells;Ernesto A Aguilar Salegio;R Mark Richardson

  • Neurostimulation for traumatic brain injury

    Samuel S Shin;C Edward Dixon;David O Okonkwo;R Mark Richardson

  • Microsurgical Anatomy of the Temporal Lobe and Its Implications on Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

    Baris Kucukyuruk;R. Mark Richardson;Hung Tzu Wen;Juan Carlos Fernandez-Miranda

  • Qualitative imaging of adeno-associated virus serotype 2-human aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene therapy in a phase I study for the treatment of Parkinson disease.

    Francisco Valles;Massimo S Fiandaca;Jamie L Eberling;Philip A Starr

  • Cannula placement for effective convection-enhanced delivery in the nonhuman primate thalamus and brainstem: implications for clinical delivery of therapeutics

    Dali Yin;R Mark Richardson;Massimo S Fiandaca;John Bringas

Frequent Co-Authors

Krystof S. Bankiewicz
Krystof S. Bankiewicz The Ohio State University
Philip A. Starr
Philip A. Starr University of California, San Francisco
Robert Turner
Robert Turner Max Planck Society
Julie A. Fiez
Julie A. Fiez University of Pittsburgh
John Forsayeth
John Forsayeth University of California, San Francisco
Mitchel S. Berger
Mitchel S. Berger University of California, San Francisco
Wolf-Julian Neumann
Wolf-Julian Neumann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Andrea A. Kühn
Andrea A. Kühn Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Aviva Abosch
Aviva Abosch University of Colorado Denver
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career opportunities. Many students interested in mental health may consider online psych d programs. These programs provide advanced training for those looking to practice as licensed psychologists or pursue research and clinical roles.

Another popular route is in counseling, with options like marriage and family therapy online programs accredited. These programs are designed for individuals aiming to become certified therapists, often allowing for flexible schedules and remote learning.

For students eager to fast-track their education, accelerated programs offer the ability to earn a bachelor’s degree in less time. This pathway can be ideal for those transitioning careers or looking to enter the workforce rapidly.

It’s also beneficial to consider potential earnings. Exploring highest earning degrees can help students align their neuroscience study with lucrative fields, ensuring a balance between passion and financial stability after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing R. Mark Richardson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles