World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Long Ngo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Long Ngo between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Long Ngo published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 24 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Long Ngo: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 5
2007 10
2008 9
2009 6
2010 10
2011 14
2012 13
2013 10
2014 10
2015 7
2016 15
2017 10
2018 8
2019 11
2020 20
2021 30
2022 24
2023 26
2024 21
2025 23
2026 1
Total 295
Download as CSV

Long Ngo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Long Ngo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Long Ngo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Long Ngo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Long Ngo is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the fields of cardiology, critical care, and neurology. Their publications focus on topics intersecting advanced cardiac imaging, intensive care cognitive disorders, and cardiovascular risk factors.

Their recent research outputs include studies published in key journals between 2020 and 2023. Notable publications include:

  • "Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Organ Injury in Septic Shock" (2020) in JAMA
  • "Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in breast cancer: A meta-analysis" (2020) in Sleep Medicine Reviews
  • "Six-Year Cognitive Trajectory in Older Adults Following Major Surgery and Delirium" (2023) in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Association of Plasma Neurofilament Light with Postoperative Delirium" (2020) in Annals of Neurology
  • "Machine Learning to Develop and Internally Validate a Predictive Model for Post-operative Delirium in a Prospective, Observational Clinical Cohort Study of Older Surgical Patients" (2020) in Journal of General Internal Medicine

Long Ngo collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Reza Nezafat
  • Edward R. Marcantonio
  • Jennifer Rodriguez
  • Warren J. Manning
  • Sharon K. Inouye

Key venues where Long Ngo has frequently published include:

  • Hypertension
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
  • PLoS ONE

Their main field of study is Medicine, with a substantial focus on several subfields:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Surgery

The primary topics of Long Ngo's work include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Best Publications

  • Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients

    Alexander R. Green;Dana R. Carney;Daniel J. Pallin;Long H. Ngo

  • The FLARE™ Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging System: A First-in-Human Clinical Trial in Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping

    Susan L. Troyan;Vida Kianzad;Summer L. Gibbs-Strauss;Sylvain Gioux

  • Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead

    Tom Delbanco;Jan Walker;Sigall K. Bell;Jonathan D. Darer

  • Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia.

    Shoshana J. Herzig;Michael D. Howell;Long H. Ngo;Edward R. Marcantonio

  • Competing Risk of Death: An Important Consideration in Studies of Older Adults

    Sarah D. Berry;Long Ngo;Elizabeth J. Samelson;Douglas P. Kiel

  • Predicting sample size required for classification performance

    Rosa L Figueroa;Qing Zeng-Treitler;Sasikiran Kandula;Long H Ngo

  • Breast Cancer Among the Oldest Old: Tumor Characteristics, Treatment Choices, and Survival

    Mara A. Schonberg;Edward R. Marcantonio;Donglin Li;Rebecca A. Silliman

  • Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;Daniel Talmor;Dermot Lahey

  • Associations of Body Composition with Physical Performance and Self-reported Functional Limitation in Elderly Men and Women

    Barbara Sternfeld;Long Ngo;William A. Satariano;Ira B. Tager

  • 3D-CAM: Derivation and Validation of a 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-Defined Delirium: A Cross-sectional Diagnostic Test Study

    Edward R. Marcantonio;Long H. Ngo;Margaret O'Connor;Richard N. Jones

  • The short-term and long-term relationship between delirium and cognitive trajectory in older surgical patients

    Sharon K. Inouye;Edward R. Marcantonio;Cyrus M. Kosar;Douglas Tommet

  • Maternal smoking during pregnancy. Effects on lung function during the first 18 months of life.

    I B Tager;L Ngo;J P Hanrahan

  • MR Imaging Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy

    Ivan Pedrosa;Deborah Levine;Aimee D. Eyvazzadeh;Bettina Siewert

  • Diagnostic utility of abbreviated fluency measures in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia.

    S.J. D. Canning;L. Leach;D. Stuss;L. Ngo

  • Renal Cell Carcinoma: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Differentiation of Tumor Subtypes—Correlation with Pathologic Findings

    Maryellen R. M. Sun;Long Ngo;Elizabeth M. Genega;Michael B. Atkins

  • Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four T1 mapping sequences: a head-to-head comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE.

    Sébastien Roujol;Sebastian Weingärtner;Murilo Foppa;Kelvin Chow

  • A prospective, multicenter derivation of a biomarker panel to assess risk of organ dysfunction, shock, and death in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Stephen Trzeciak;Judd E. Hollander;Robert Birkhahn

  • Toward Optimization of Imaging System and Lymphatic Tracer for Near-Infrared Fluorescent Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer

    J. Sven D. Mieog;Susan L. Troyan;Merlijn Hutteman;Merlijn Hutteman;Kevin J. Donohoe

  • Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results.

    B. Nicolas Bloch;B. Nicolas Bloch;Edna Furman-Haran;Thomas H. Helbich;Robert E. Lenkinski

  • The association of sepsis syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.

    Nathan Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;David W. Bates;Derek C. Angus

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward R. Marcantonio
Edward R. Marcantonio Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sharon K. Inouye
Sharon K. Inouye Harvard Medical School
Towia A. Libermann
Towia A. Libermann Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Warren J. Manning
Warren J. Manning Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Richard N. Jones
Richard N. Jones Brown University
Ira B. Tager
Ira B. Tager University of California, Berkeley
Nathan I. Shapiro
Nathan I. Shapiro Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David C. Alsop
David C. Alsop Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lisa I. Iezzoni
Lisa I. Iezzoni Harvard University
Suzanne G. Leveille
Suzanne G. Leveille University of Massachusetts Boston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, many related online degrees can pave the way toward a rewarding healthcare career. Those seeking to start quickly in the field may consider online lpn programs, which offer a fast-track route to becoming a licensed practical nurse and offer the flexibility of distance learning.

Nurses looking to advance their qualifications should explore bsn to np programs online. These programs enable registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, often with specialized tracks such as psychiatric or family practice.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, a health care administration degree online can open doors to management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations. These programs teach vital skills in operations, finance, and policy.

Many students also pursue graduate-level training, and the most affordable mha programs are designed for working professionals seeking a master’s in healthcare administration. Choosing an online pathway can provide greater flexibility and affordability while preparing graduates for higher-level administrative roles in a rapidly evolving industry.

Best Scientists Citing Long Ngo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles