What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Psychiatry
Richard N. Jones mainly focuses on Delirium, Prospective cohort study, Dementia, Cognition and Internal medicine.
Delirium is a subfield of Psychiatry that Richard N. Jones studies.
Richard N. Jones has researched Prospective cohort study in several fields, including Cardiac surgery and Physical therapy, Activities of daily living.
His Dementia research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Odds ratio, Mortality rate and Pediatrics.
His Cognition study combines topics in areas such as Developmental psychology and Cognitive psychology.
His Internal medicine research incorporates themes from Anesthesia, Risk assessment and Cardiology.
His most cited work include:
- The Clinical Course of Advanced Dementia (1044 citations)
- Cognitive Trajectories after Postoperative Delirium (607 citations)
- Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. (464 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Delirium, Cognition, Dementia, Clinical psychology and Psychiatry.
Richard N. Jones combines subjects such as Emergency medicine, Internal medicine, Prospective cohort study, Cohort and Elective surgery with his study of Delirium.
The Cognition study which covers Gerontology that intersects with Activities of daily living.
His studies deal with areas such as Alzheimer's disease and Comorbidity as well as Dementia.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Psychological intervention, Item response theory and Depression in addition to Clinical psychology.
The concepts of his Psychiatry study are interwoven with issues in Cohort study and MEDLINE.
He most often published in these fields:
- Delirium (33.50%)
- Cognition (24.38%)
- Dementia (18.97%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Delirium (33.50%)
- Cognition (24.38%)
- Clinical psychology (14.78%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Richard N. Jones focuses on Delirium, Cognition, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine and Dementia.
His research integrates issues of Confidence interval, Emergency medicine, Prospective cohort study, Intracerebral hemorrhage and Cohort in his study of Delirium.
His Prospective cohort study study combines topics in areas such as Elective surgery and Activities of daily living.
Richard N. Jones has researched Cognition in several fields, including Neuroimaging and Cognitive decline.
His studies in Clinical psychology integrate themes in fields like Psychological intervention, Child and adolescent psychiatry and Depression.
The Dementia study combines topics in areas such as Psychiatry, Gerontology, Cognitive test and Response rate.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Whitepaper: Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance (213 citations)
- Brain reserve, cognitive reserve, compensation, and maintenance: operationalization, validity, and mechanisms of cognitive resilience (33 citations)
- Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (33 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Cancer
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Delirium, Cognition, Clinical psychology, Prospective cohort study and Psychosocial.
His study with Delirium involves better knowledge in Psychiatry.
His Cognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Alpha, Dementia and Psychological resilience.
His Dementia research focuses on Response rate and how it relates to Cohort study.
His study in Clinical psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Psychological intervention, Family caregivers, Observational study and Personality changes.
Internal medicine covers Richard N. Jones research in Prospective cohort study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
