World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
103
Citations
32530
World Ranking
555
National Ranking
347

Neuroscience

D-Index
104
Citations
32837
World Ranking
672
National Ranking
374

Dan M Mungas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan M Mungas sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 392 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dan M Mungas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan M Mungas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dan M Mungas is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with substantial contributions to psychiatry and mental health, health, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Their main research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments

Dan M Mungas has published in multiple frequent venues, such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Some notable recent papers include:

  • "Late-Life Physical and Cognitive Activities Independently Contribute to Brain and Cognitive Resilience," 2020, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • "Development and validation of the Uniform Data Set (v3.0) executive function composite score (UDS3-EF)," 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Differentiating among stages of cognitive impairment in aging: Version 3 of the Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological test battery and MoCA index scores," 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • "The Measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog)," 2021, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • "Association of vascular brain injury, neurodegeneration, amyloid, and cognitive trajectory," 2020, Neurology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Paola Gilsanz
  • M. Maria Glymour
  • Charles DeCarli
  • Elizabeth Rose Mayeda

Best Publications

  • Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky

  • Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Danielle J Harvey

  • Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)

    Paul K. Crane;Adam Carle;Laura E. Gibbons;Philip Insel

  • White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location

    Mats Tullberg;E. Fletcher;Charles DeCarli;Dan M Mungas

  • The Measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog): Scale Development and Psychometric Properties

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Deborah Cahn-Weiner

  • Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers' Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS)

    Sandra Weintraub;Lilah Besser;Hiroko H. Dodge;Merilee Teylan

  • A composite score for executive functioning, validated in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with baseline mild cognitive impairment

    Laura E. Gibbons;Adam C. Carle;R. Scott Mackin;Danielle J Harvey

  • Prevalence of Dementia in Older Latinos: The Influence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke and Genetic Factors

    Mary N. Haan;Dan M. Mungas;Hector M. Gonzalez;Teresa A. Ortiz

  • Extent and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging, MCI, and AD

    M. Yoshita;E. Fletcher;Danielle J Harvey;M. Ortega

  • Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly

    Dan M Mungas;S. C. Marshall;M. Weldon;M. Haan

  • Reliability and Validity of Composite Scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Adults

    Robert K. Heaton;Natacha Akshoomoff;David Tulsky;Dan M Mungas

  • Longitudinal volumetric MRI change and rate of cognitive decline

    Dan M Mungas;Danielle J Harvey;Bruce R Reed;W. J. Jagust

  • Central obesity and the aging brain.

    William Jagust;Danielle J Harvey;Dan M Mungas;Mary Haan

  • In-office mental status testing: a practical guide.

    Dan M Mungas

  • What does fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging add to a clinical diagnosis of dementia

    W. Jagust;Bruce R Reed;Dan M Mungas;W. Ellis

  • Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease

    J. H. Kramer;Bruce R Reed;Dan M Mungas;M. W. Weiner

  • MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease

    Dan M Mungas;W. J. Jagust;W. J. Jagust;Bruce R Reed;J. H. Kramer

  • Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Vascular Dementia: A Multicenter Study of Comparability and Interrater Reliability

    Helena C. Chui;Helena C. Chui;Wendy Mack;J. Edward Jackson;Daniel Mungas

  • Homocysteine, B vitamins, and the incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment: results from the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging

    Mary N Haan;Joshua W Miller;Allison E Aiello;Rachel A Whitmer

  • Profiles of neuropsychological impairment in autopsy-defined Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease.

    Bruce R. Reed;Dan M. Mungas;Joel H. Kramer;William Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce R Reed
Bruce R Reed University of California, Davis
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias University of California, Davis
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Danielle J Harvey
Danielle J Harvey University of California, Davis
M. Maria Glymour
M. Maria Glymour Boston University
Helena C. Chui
Helena C. Chui University of Southern California
Mary N. Haan
Mary N. Haan University of California, San Francisco
Owen Carmichael
Owen Carmichael Pennington Biomedical Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens doors to many online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in counseling, obtaining the correct license is crucial. Requirements can vary significantly depending on the state where you plan to practice.

For example, aspiring counselors must meet lpc license requirements in Utah, which include educational qualifications, supervised experience, and passing specific exams. Similarly, knowing the lpc license requirements in Vermont or the Virginia lpc licensure requirements is essential if you are considering working in those states.

Some states have unique requirements, as outlined in the Washington lpc licensure requirements. Understanding these specific pathways can help you plan an educational track that meets your goals. Whether through an online psychology degree or a blended program, aligning your studies with state licensure standards ensures a smoother transition into your counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Dan M Mungas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles