World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
28143
World Ranking
9032
National Ranking
4654

Bruce R Reed publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R Reed sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 238 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bruce R Reed D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce R Reed sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce R Reed is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their work spans predominantly the social sciences with a specific focus on several subfields including gender studies, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, health, safety research, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their research covers a range of main topics, notably diversity and career development in medicine, radiology practices and education, health disparities and outcomes, health and medical research impacts, migration, aging, and tourism studies, homelessness and social issues, as well as data-driven disease surveillance.

Bruce R Reed has contributed to multiple research publications across several reputable venues. These include:

  • Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling
  • eLife
  • The Gerontologist
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bruce R Reed include:

  • An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes, 2021, eLife
  • An Experimental Test of the Effects of Redacting Grant Applicant Identifiers on Peer Review Outcomes, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • A Community-Engaged Scoping Review of Affordable Housing Models for LGBTQ+ Older Adults, 2025, The Gerontologist
  • Utilization of geospatial distribution in the measurement of study cohort representativeness, 2024, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • A Learning Communities Infusion Model for Enhancing Rehabilitation Counselor Education Programs, 2024, Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling

Throughout their career, Bruce R Reed has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Richard Nakamura, Lee S. Mann, Mark D. Lindner, Jeremy Braithwaite, and Mei-Ching Chen. Each of these collaborators has contributed to multiple publications with Reed.

Best Publications

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

    A. T. Du;N. Schuff;N. Schuff;D. Amend;M. P. Laakso

  • Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Danielle J Harvey

  • Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging.

    Todd S. Braver;M Deanna;Beth A. Keys;Cameron S. Carter

  • White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location

    Mats Tullberg;E. Fletcher;Charles DeCarli;Dan M Mungas

  • The Measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog): Scale Development and Psychometric Properties

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Deborah Cahn-Weiner

  • Hippocampal and cortical atrophy predict dementia in subcortical ischemic vascular disease

    G. Fein;V. Di Sclafani;J. Tanabe;J. Tanabe;V. Cardenas;V. Cardenas

  • Extent and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging, MCI, and AD

    M. Yoshita;E. Fletcher;Danielle J Harvey;M. Ortega

  • Quantitative NMR measurements of hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease.

    J. P. Seab;W. J. Jagust;W. J. Jagust;S. T S Wong;M. S. Roos

  • Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation

    Sylvia Villeneuve;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici;Gil D. Rabinovici;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Brendan I. Cohn-Sheehy;Cindee Madison

  • Age and education correction of Mini-Mental State Examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly

    Dan M Mungas;S. C. Marshall;M. Weldon;M. Haan

  • Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory.

    David L Woods;Mark M. Kishiyama;E. William Yund;Timothy J. Herron

  • Computer-based Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results from a Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Deborah E. Barnes;Kristine Yaffe;Nataliya Belfor;William J. Jagust

  • Anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease: Relationships to depression, cognitive function, and cerebral perfusion

    Bruce R. Reed;William J. Jagust;Lila Coulter

  • Longitudinal volumetric MRI change and rate of cognitive decline

    Dan M Mungas;Danielle J Harvey;Bruce R Reed;W. J. Jagust

  • What does fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging add to a clinical diagnosis of dementia

    W. Jagust;Bruce R Reed;Dan M Mungas;W. Ellis

  • Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease

    J. H. Kramer;Bruce R Reed;Dan M Mungas;M. W. Weiner

  • MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease

    Dan M Mungas;W. J. Jagust;W. J. Jagust;Bruce R Reed;J. H. Kramer

  • Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Vascular Dementia: A Multicenter Study of Comparability and Interrater Reliability

    Helena C. Chui;Helena C. Chui;Wendy Mack;J. Edward Jackson;Daniel Mungas

  • Profiles of neuropsychological impairment in autopsy-defined Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease.

    Bruce R. Reed;Dan M. Mungas;Joel H. Kramer;William Ellis

  • MCI is associated with deficits in everyday functioning.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Danielle J Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Helena C. Chui
Helena C. Chui University of Southern California
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias University of California, Davis
Norbert Schuff
Norbert Schuff University of California, San Francisco
Owen Carmichael
Owen Carmichael Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Danielle J Harvey
Danielle J Harvey University of California, Davis
Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related pathways. Many students consider nursing as a flexible and rewarding field, especially with the rise of online education options. For those looking for advanced practice roles, affordable online FNP programs offer a path to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, allowing greater autonomy and earning potential.

If you are a registered nurse wanting to further your qualifications, pursuing the average cost of RN to BSN programs can help you understand the financial commitment and find budget-friendly options. In fact, the cheapest RN to BSN online programs can make advancing your education more accessible while still meeting industry standards.

For those interested in teaching, research, or high-level leadership in nursing, PhD nursing programs provide specialized knowledge and new career opportunities. These diverse online degree pathways offer flexible, affordable routes to the growing and impactful field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce R Reed

Trending Scientists