World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
31055
World Ranking
14954
National Ranking
7556

Jane A. Mitchell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane A. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 328 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jane A. Mitchell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane A. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane A. Mitchell is a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biochemistry, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects, eicosanoids and hypertension pharmacology, COVID-19 clinical research studies, antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular diseases, nitric oxide and endothelin effects, pulmonary hypertension research and treatments, and long-term effects of COVID-19.

Jane A. Mitchell has contributed to various recent papers, among which are:

  • "A persistent neutrophil-associated immune signature characterizes post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae" (2022, Science Translational Medicine)
  • "Cyclooxygenases and the cardiovascular system" (2020, Pharmacology & Therapeutics)
  • "Regular Acetaminophen Use and Blood Pressure in People With Hypertension: The PATH-BP Trial" (2022, Circulation)
  • "Beyond epithelial damage: vascular and endothelial contributions to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis" (2023, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • "Understanding the burden of interstitial lung disease post-COVID-19: the UK Interstitial Lung Disease-Long COVID Study (UKILD-Long COVID)" (2021, BMJ Open Respiratory Research)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Nicholas S. Kirkby, Blerina Ahmetaj-Shala, Ricky Vaja, Paul C. Armstrong, and Fisnik Shala.

Publication venues where Jane A. Mitchell has appeared multiple times include Circulation, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Science Translational Medicine, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • Selectivity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as inhibitors of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenase

    Jane A. Mitchell;Pravit Akarasereenont;Christoph Thiemermann;Roderick J. Flower

  • Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: A full in vitro analysis

    Timothy D. Warner;Francesco Giuliano;Ivana Vojnovic;Antoaneta Bukasa

  • Inducible isoforms of cyclooxygenase and nitric-oxide synthase in inflammation

    John R. Vane;Jane A. Mitchell;Ian Appleton;Annette Tomlinson

  • The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies

    Trevor T. Hansel;Harald Kropshofer;Thomas Singer;Jane A. Mitchell

  • Purification and characterization of particulate endothelium-derived relaxing factor synthase from cultured and native bovine aortic endothelial cells.

    Jennifer S. Pollock;Ulrich Forstermann;Jane A. Mitchell;Timothy D. Warner

  • Isoforms of nitric oxide synthase Characterization and purification from different cell types

    Ulrich Förstermann;Haral H.H.W. Schmidt;Jennifer S. Pollock;Hong Sheng

  • Cyclooxygenases: new forms, new inhibitors, and lessons from the clinic

    Timothy D. Warner;Jane A. Mitchell

  • Cyclooxygenase-2: Regulation and relevance in inflammation

    Jane A. Mitchell;Simon Larkin;Timothy J. Williams

  • Nitric oxide-mediated hyporeactivity to noradrenaline precedes the induction of nitric oxide synthase in endotoxin shock.

    Csaba Szabó;Jane A. Mitchell;Christoph Thiemermann;John R. Vane

  • Vascular hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictor agents and hemodynamic decompensation in hemorrhagic shock is mediated by nitric oxide

    Christoph Thiemermann;Csaba Szabo;Jane A. Mitchell;John R. Vane

  • Reactive oxygen species in acute lung injury

    F. Chabot;J. A. Mitchell;J. M. C. Gutteridge;T. W. Evans

  • Cyclo-oxygenase-2: pharmacology, physiology, biochemistry and relevance to NSAID therapy

    Jane A Mitchell;Timothy D Warner

  • Cyclooxygenase-3 (COX-3): Filling in the gaps toward a COX continuum?

    Timothy D. Warner;Jane A. Mitchell

  • Circulating MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers for Platelet Activation

    Peter Willeit;Anna Zampetaki;Katarzyna Dudek;Dorothee Kaudewitz

  • Co-induction of nitric oxide synthase and cyclo-oxygenase: interactions between nitric oxide and prostanoids.

    Tomasz A. Swierkosz;Jane A. Mitchell;Timothy D. Warner;Regina M. Botting

  • Induction of cyclo-oxygenase-2 by cytokines in human pulmonary epithelial cells: regulation by dexamethasone

    Jane A. Mitchell;Maria G. Belvisi;Pravit Akarasereenont;Richard A. Robbins

  • Role of nitric oxide and prostacyclin as vasoactive hormones released by the endothelium.

    Jane A. Mitchell;Ferhana Ali;Lucy Bailey;Laura Moreno

  • Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 release EDRF from isolated perfused arterial vessels of the rat and rabbit.

    T D Warner;J A Mitchell;G de Nucci;J R Vane

  • Redox imbalance in the critically ill.

    John M C Gutteridge;Jane Mitchell

  • COX isoforms in the cardiovascular system: understanding the activities of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    Jane A. Mitchell;Timothy D. Warner

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy D. Warner
Timothy D. Warner Queen Mary University of London
Timothy W. Evans
Timothy W. Evans Imperial College London
Maria G. Belvisi
Maria G. Belvisi Imperial College London
John R. Vane
John R. Vane St Bartholomew's Hospital
Christoph Thiemermann
Christoph Thiemermann Queen Mary University of London
Magdi H. Yacoub
Magdi H. Yacoub Imperial College London
Darryl C. Zeldin
Darryl C. Zeldin National Institutes of Health
Harvey R. Herschman
Harvey R. Herschman University of California, Los Angeles
Ulrich Förstermann
Ulrich Förstermann Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Peter J. Barnes
Peter J. Barnes Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare professions and advanced academic routes. Many students and professionals consider online degrees as a flexible way to earn qualifications and expand their career opportunities while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in healthcare management, it’s vital to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure accreditation, curriculum relevance, and strong career outcomes. Nurses aiming to advance can explore rn to bsn with no clinicals options, which allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree online without additional in-person clinical requirements.

For advanced practice, professionals can consider dnp online programs that offer flexible, rigorous doctoral education in nursing. Those who are cost-conscious should also look at the cheapest online dnp programs to find affordable paths to their doctorate.

Each of these related online pathways offers unique benefits and can complement a medical education, helping students and professionals shape rewarding careers across the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Jane A. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles