World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Balasubramaniam Ramesh

Balasubramaniam Ramesh

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
8798
World Ranking
9598
National Ranking
4068

Balasubramaniam Ramesh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Balasubramaniam Ramesh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Balasubramaniam Ramesh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Balasubramaniam Ramesh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Balasubramaniam Ramesh is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, with notable contributions in biomedical engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, artificial intelligence, information systems, and surgery.

Their work addresses various topics including ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), gas sensing nanomaterials and sensors, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, scientific computing and data management, information and cyber security, as well as cybercrime and law enforcement studies.

Recent publications by Ramesh cover diverse areas of research:

  • Establishing Data Provenance for Responsible Artificial Intelligence Systems (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • The Influence of Professional Subculture on Information Security Policy Violations: A Field Study in a Healthcare Context (2020), published in Information Systems Research
  • Investigating the Performance of a Novel pH and Cathepsin B Sensitive, Stimulus-Responsive Nanoparticle for Optimised Sonodynamic Therapy in Prostate Cancer (2020), published in Journal of Controlled Release
  • Why do Family Members Reject AI in Health Care? Competing Effects of Emotions (2022), published in Journal of Management Information Systems
  • A Platform-Based Approach to Ambidexterity for Innovation: An Empirical Investigation in the Public Sector (2022), published in International Journal of Information Management

Frequent co-authors in Ramesh's research collaborations include Lan Cao, Karl Werder, Eun Hee Park, Sumantra Sarkar, and Prakash Kanjariya.

Ramesh's work has been published in a range of academic venues, with repeated publications in the International Journal of Information Management, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, Information Systems Research, and Journal of Controlled Release.

Best Publications

  • Toward reference models for requirements traceability

    B. Ramesh;M. Jarke

  • Agile Requirements Engineering Practices: An Empirical Study

    Lan Cao;B. Ramesh

  • Agile requirements engineering practices and challenges: an empirical study

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Lan Cao;Richard L. Baskerville

  • Can distributed software development be agile

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Lan Cao;Kannan Mohan;Peng Xu

  • Supporting systems development by capturing deliberations during requirements engineering

    B. Ramesh;V. Dhar

  • Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Amrit Tiwana

  • A framework for adapting agile development methodologies

    Lan Cao;Kannan Mohan;Peng Xu;Balasubramaniam Ramesh

  • Factors influencing requirements traceability practice

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh

  • A meta-model for representing variability in product family development

    Felix Bachmann;Michael Goedicke;Julio Leite;Robert Nord

  • Is "Internet-speed" software development different?

    R. Baskerville;B. Ramesh;L. Levine;J. Pries-Heje

  • Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Kannan Mohan;Lan Cao

  • Implementing requirements traceability: a case study

    B. Ramesh;T. Powers;C. Stubbs;M. Edwards

  • Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale

    Matti Rossi;Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Kalle Lyytinen;Juha-Pekka Tolvanen

  • A design knowledge management system to support collaborative information product evolution

    Amrit Tiwana;Balasubramaniam Ramesh

  • Aligning software processes with strategy

    Sandra A. Slaughter;Linda Levine;Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Achieving dynamic capabilities with cloud computing: an empirical investigation

    Douglas A Battleson;Barry C West;Jongwoo Kim;Balasubramaniam Ramesh

  • How Internet software companies negotiate quality

    R. Baskerville;L. Levine;J. Pries-Heje;S. Slaughter

  • How extreme does extreme programming have to be? Adapting XP practices to large-scale projects

    Lan Cao;K. Mohan;Peng Xu;B. Ramesh

  • Issues in the development of a requirements traceability model

    B. Ramesh;M. Edwards

  • Requirements traceability: Theory and practice

    Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Curtis Stubbs;Timothy Powers;Michael Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Baskerville
Richard L. Baskerville Georgia State University
Jan Pries-Heje
Jan Pries-Heje Roskilde University
Amrit Tiwana
Amrit Tiwana University of Georgia
Kalle Lyytinen
Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University
Matti Rossi
Matti Rossi Aalto University
Sandra A. Slaughter
Sandra A. Slaughter Georgia Institute of Technology
Klaus Pohl
Klaus Pohl University of Duisburg-Essen
Alexander Maedche
Alexander Maedche Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Mark Keil
Mark Keil Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degree options and career routes. For those looking to expand their expertise, online electrical engineering courses USA can be a smart choice. These programs often overlap with computer science, especially in fields like robotics, embedded systems, and hardware design.

If you’re eager to enter the tech workforce quickly, consider easy certifications that pay well. Such certifications can boost your resume and help you land entry-level positions in IT, cybersecurity, and data analysis—all in a shorter timeframe.

Many professionals also pursue quick masters degrees online for faster career advancement. These accelerated programs are designed for flexibility, allowing you to study while working and graduate sooner.

Lastly, choosing among the most useful masters degrees can greatly improve your employability. High-demand specializations include artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data science. Each pathway offers unique benefits and can help you shape a rewarding career in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Balasubramaniam Ramesh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles