World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nils Brede Moe

Nils Brede Moe

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
7186
World Ranking
10599
National Ranking
33

Nils Brede Moe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nils Brede Moe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 163 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nils Brede Moe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nils Brede Moe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nils Brede Moe is affiliated with SINTEF in Norway and has an extensive body of research primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting. Their work spans diverse subfields, including Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications, and Social Psychology.

Their research topics focus notably on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Software Engineering Research, Open Source Software Innovations, Collaboration in Agile Enterprises, Team Dynamics and Performance, Big Data and Business Intelligence, and Digital Transformation in Industry.

Recent publications by Nils Brede Moe include:

  • "Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies" (2022) in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "From forced Working-From-Home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: Two revolutions in telework" (2022) in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "Changes in perceived productivity of software engineers during COVID-19 pandemic: The voice of evidence" (2021) in Journal of Systems and Software
  • "A Taxonomy of Inter-Team Coordination Mechanisms in Large-Scale Agile" (2022) in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "Finding the sweet spot for organizational control and team autonomy in large-scale agile software development" (2021) in Empirical Software Engineering

Nils Brede Moe frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Darja Šmite, Viktoria Stray, Anastasiia Tkalich, Marthe Berntzen, and Rasmus Ulfsnes.

Their work is published in a range of venues, with a significant number of papers appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Journal of Systems and Software, IEEE Software, and Empirical Software Engineering.

Best Publications

  • A decade of agile methodologies

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Sridhar Nerur;VenuGopal Balijepally;Nils Brede Moe

  • A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project

    Nils Brede Moe;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Tore Dybå

  • Understanding a lack of trust in Global Software Teams: a multiple-case study

    Nils Brede Moe;Darja Šmite

  • Exploring software development at the very large-scale: a revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation

    Torgeir DingsØyr;Nils Brede Moe;Tor Erlend Fægri;Eva Amdahl Seim

  • Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development

    Nils Brede Moe;Aybüke Aurum;Tore Dybå

  • Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development

    N.B. Moe;T. Dingsoyr;T. Dyba

  • Overcoming Barriers to Self-Management in Software Teams

    N.B. Moe;T. Dingsoyr;T. Dyba

  • Agile Software Development: Current Research and Future Directions

    Torgeir Dingsyr;Tore Dyb;Nils Brede Moe

  • Research challenges in large-scale agile software development

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe

  • Towards principles of large-scale agile development: A summary of the workshop at XP2014 and a revised research Agenda

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe;Nils Brede Moe

  • Coordinating Knowledge Work in Multiteam Programs: Findings From a Large-Scale Agile Development Program

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe;Eva Amdahl Seim

  • Software teams and their knowledge networks in large-scale software development

    Darja mite;Nils Brede Moe;Aivars blis;Claes Wohlin

  • Scrum and Team Effectiveness: Theory and Practice

    Nils Brede Moe;Torgeir Dingsøyr

  • Understanding a lack of trust in Global Software Teams: a multiple‐case study

    Unknown

  • From offshore outsourcing to insourcing and partnerships: four failed outsourcing attempts

    Nils Brede Moe;Darja Šmite;Geir Kjetil Hanssen;Hamish Barney

  • Agile Project Management

    Tore Dybå;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe

  • Transition from a plan-driven process to Scrum: a longitudinal case study on software quality

    Jingyue Li;Nils B. Moe;Tore Dybå

  • Signs of Agile Trends in Global Software Engineering Research: A Tertiary Study

    Geir K. Hanssen;Darja mite;Nils Brede Moe

  • Understanding coordination in global software engineering: A mixed-methods study on the use of meetings and Slack

    Viktoria Stray;Nils Brede Moe

  • Agility Across Time and Space: Implementing Agile Methods in Global Software Projects

    Darja Smite;Nils Brede Moe;Pr J. Gerfalk

  • Autonomous agile teams: challenges and future directions for research

    Viktoria Stray;Nils Brede Moe;Rashina Hoda

  • Slack me if you can!: using enterprise social networking tools in virtual agile teams

    Viktoria Stray;Nils Brede Moe;Mehdi Noroozi

  • Agile Software Development

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Tore Dybå;Nils Brede Moe

Frequent Co-Authors

Torgeir Dingsøyr
Torgeir Dingsøyr Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Rashina Hoda
Rashina Hoda Monash University
Aybüke Aurum
Aybüke Aurum University of New South Wales
Claes Wohlin
Claes Wohlin Blekinge Institute of Technology
Dag I. K. Sjøberg
Dag I. K. Sjøberg University of Oslo
Pär J. Ågerfalk
Pär J. Ågerfalk Uppsala University
Maria Paasivaara
Maria Paasivaara Lappeenranta University of Technology
Helena Holmström Olsson
Helena Holmström Olsson Malmö University
Reidar Conradi
Reidar Conradi Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth considering related fields and advanced career opportunities made accessible through online education. Many universities now offer some of the cheapest online masters programs, making it possible to expand your skillset affordably and flexibly.

For those interested in moving into business leadership, affordable emba programs are a practical step to blend technical skills with strategic management knowledge. If you're keen on information management or education, a librarian degree online can open doors in digital archiving and research science.

Looking further ahead, professionals with significant experience may consider an online phd leadership program to attain executive or academic roles. With so many affordable online degree options, charting diverse career pathways in and beyond Computer Science has never been more achievable.

Best Scientists Citing Nils Brede Moe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles