What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Neuroscience
Her main research concerns Aphasia, Dissociation, Comprehension, Dysgraphia and Agrammatism.
Her Aphasia research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of German, Hebrew, Morpheme, Language disorder and Reading.
In her study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Morpheme, Cognitive psychology is strongly linked to Cognition.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Function word, Spelling and Orthography.
Her Spelling research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Lexicon, Subject and Vowel.
The concepts of her Agrammatism study are interwoven with issues in Object, Speech perception, Phonetics and Verb.
Her most cited work include:
- On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main Verbs (423 citations)
- On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main Verbs (423 citations)
- The structure of graphemic representations. (293 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Cognitive psychology, Aphasia, Language disorder, Audiology and Dysgraphia.
Her work deals with themes such as Cognition, Perception and Comprehension, which intersect with Cognitive psychology.
The Agrammatism research Gabriele Miceli does as part of her general Aphasia study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Brain lesions, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
The various areas that she examines in her Language disorder study include Lexico, Lexicon, Phonetics, Set and Phonology.
Her studies examine the connections between Audiology and genetics, as well as such issues in Lesion, with regards to Developmental psychology.
Her studies deal with areas such as Working memory, Consonant, Vowel and Spelling as well as Dysgraphia.
She most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (34.72%)
- Aphasia (40.28%)
- Language disorder (23.61%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2005-2016)?
- Cognition (16.67%)
- Cognitive psychology (34.72%)
- Aphasia (40.28%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Aphasia, Neuroscience and Fusiform gyrus.
Her Cognition research incorporates themes from Semantics, Surgery, Selection and Orthographic projection.
Her Cognitive psychology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Speech shadowing, Speech perception, Motor theory of speech perception and Visual perception.
Her Aphasia research integrates issues from Noun, Concreteness, Proper noun, Speech production and Motor speech.
Her Fusiform face area, Limbic lobe and Face perception study in the realm of Neuroscience interacts with subjects such as Stroke patient and Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Neuropsychological battery, Visual agnosia and Audiology in addition to Fusiform gyrus.
Between 2005 and 2016, her most popular works were:
- Reversed concreteness effect for nouns in a subject with semantic dementia. (65 citations)
- The Role of Broca’s area in Speech Perception: Evidence from Aphasia Revisited (58 citations)
- Cognitive outcome after awake surgery for tumors in language areas (56 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Neuroscience
Aphasia, Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Motor speech and Noun are her primary areas of study.
Her Cognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Pediatrics, Language assessment and Mood.
Her research integrates issues of Speech shadowing, Speech perception, Motor theory of speech perception, Broca's area and Speech production in her study of Motor speech.
Her Speech production study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Visual perception.
Her study in Noun is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Concreteness, Proper noun and Lateralization of brain function.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
