World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gabriele Miceli

Gabriele Miceli

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
9303
World Ranking
7459
National Ranking
151

Gabriele Miceli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriele Miceli sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gabriele Miceli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriele Miceli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gabriele Miceli is affiliated with the University of Trento in Italy. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Neuroscience, Engineering, and Psychology. Within these domains, Miceli has contributed extensively to specialized subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work frequently appears in publication venues such as Procedia Structural Integrity, IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, Cortex, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, and Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. These outlets reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research interests.

Miceli's research addresses a range of topics, with particular emphasis on:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Miceli include Federico Foria, Rita Capasso, Salvatore Gazzo, Loredana Contrafatto, and M. Cuomo. These partnerships suggest an active engagement with peers in both neuroscience and engineering contexts.

Among Miceli's recent publications are studies that cover a broad spectrum of neuroscience and language-related topics. Selected publications include:

  • The Auditory Agnosias: a Short Review of Neurofunctional Evidence, 2023, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
  • Language Assessment in Multilingualism and Awake Neurosurgery, 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Language impairments and CNS infections: a review, 2021, Aphasiology
  • The role of semantics and repair processes in article-noun gender disagreement in Italian: An ERP study, 2020, Brain and Language
  • The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study, 2020, Brain Structure and Function

These publications provide insights into language processing, neurofunctional clinical evidence, and neurological disorders affecting language, reflecting Miceli's engagement with both cognitive neuroscience and clinical aspects.

Best Publications

  • On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main Verbs

    Gabriele Miceli;Gabriele Miceli;M. Caterina Silveri;M. Caterina Silveri;Giampiero Villa;Giampiero Villa;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The Role of the Graphemic Buffer in Spelling: Evidence from a Case of Acquired Dysgraphia

    Alfonso Caramazza;Gabriele Miceli;Giampiero Villa;Cristina Romani

  • The structure of graphemic representations.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Gabriele Miceli

  • Agrammatic aphasia : a cross-language narrative sourcebook

    Lise Menn;Loraine K. Obler;Gabriele Miceli;M. O'Connor

  • Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder

    Gabriele Miceli;Anna Mazzucchi;Lise Menn;Harold Goodglass

  • Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs

    G Miceli;C Silveri;U Nocentini;A Caramazza

  • Variation in the Pattern of Omissions and Substitutions of Grammatical Morphemes in the Spontaneous Speech of So-Called Agrammatic Patients

    Gabriele Miceli;M.Caterina Silveri;Cristina Romani;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology.

    Gabriele Miceli

  • The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge

    Gabriele Miceli;Erin Fouch;Rita Capasso;Jennifer R. Shelton

  • Neuropsychological correlates of localized cerebral lesions in non-aphasic brain-damaged patients

    Gabriele Miceli;C. Caltagirone;G. Gainotti;C. Masullo

  • The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: analysis of two cases.

    Gabriele Miceli;Antonio Amitrano;Rita Capasso;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Separable processing of consonants and vowels

    Alfonso Caramazza;Doriana Chialant;Rita Capasso;Gabriele Miceli

  • Validity of some neuropsychological tests in the assessment of mental deterioration

    C. Caltagirone;G. Gainotti;C. Masullo;G. Miceli

  • Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia

    Alfonso Caramazza;Gabriele Miceli;M. Caterina Silveri;Alessandro Laudanna

  • Cognitive Analysis of a Case of Pure Dysgraphia

    Gabriele Miceli;M.Caterina Silveri;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Some aspects of phonological impairment in aphasia.

    Gabriele Miceli;Guido Gainotti;Carlo Caltagirone;Carlo Masullo

  • Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Gabriele Miceli

  • SELECTIVE DEFICIT FOR PEOPLE’S NAMES FOLLOWING LEFT TEMPORAL DAMAGE: AN IMPAIRMENT OF DOMAIN-SPECIFIC CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE

    Gabriele Miceli;Rita Capasso;Antonio Daniele;Teresa Esposito

  • The Independence of Phonological and Orthographic Lexical Forms: Evidence from Aphasia

    G. Miceli;B. Benvegnu;R. Capasso;A. Caramazza

  • Neural bases of orthographic long-term memory and working memory in dysgraphia.

    Brenda Rapp;Jeremy Purcell;Argye E. Hillis;Rita Capasso

  • Constructional apraxia in left brain damaged patients: A planning disorder?

    G. Gainotti;G. Miceli;C. Caltagirone

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
Guido Gainotti
Guido Gainotti Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Carlo Caltagirone
Carlo Caltagirone Fondazione Santa Lucia
Maria Caterina Silveri
Maria Caterina Silveri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Erminio Capitani
Erminio Capitani University of Milan
Francesco Tomaiuolo
Francesco Tomaiuolo University of Messina
Marcella Laiacona
Marcella Laiacona University of Milan
Harold Goodglass
Harold Goodglass Boston University
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo University of Rome Tor Vergata

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and career options across the United States. Many students choose to continue their education by earning advanced degrees and specialized certifications, especially to become mental health counselors. Each state has its own set of requirements for licensure, so it's essential to understand these before moving forward.

For example, those interested in working in Florida should review the Port St. Lucie mental health counselor certification requirements. If you’re planning a career in Oregon, check the Portland mental health counselor certification requirements. In North Carolina, it’s a good idea to research how to become a mental health counselor in Raleigh, while those looking toward Nevada must be aware of the mental health counselor requirements in Reno.

Exploring online psychology degrees can help you prepare for diverse roles, from counseling to research or human resources. As you plan your journey, be sure to investigate state-specific pathways, so you can meet the requirements necessary for your chosen career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriele Miceli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles