World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
8278
World Ranking
8470
National Ranking
4533

Rita Sloan Berndt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Sloan Berndt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rita Sloan Berndt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rita Sloan Berndt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rita Sloan Berndt is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore, in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on scientific research and contributions within their domain, though specific details on recent papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not available.

Throughout their career, they have maintained an association with an established academic institution which supports research and education in various disciplines.

No detailed records of publications, including journal articles or book contributions, are provided. Similarly, there are no listed frequent co-authors or specific venues where they have published extensively.

Information regarding fields of study, subfields, and main research topics related to their work remains unreported, limiting the ability to outline their specific scientific interests or contributions.

There are no awards or recognitions documented to indicate formal acknowledgments within their professional community.

The scientist is currently living, based on the data available.

Best Publications

  • The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data.

    Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction

    John Hart;Rita Sloan Berndt;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia

    Louise B Zingeser;Rita Sloan Berndt

  • Working memory retention systems: a state of activated long-term memory.

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Jordan Grafman;Katherine Cameron;Rita S. Berndt

  • A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language

    Rita Sloan Berndt;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Verb Retrieval in Aphasia. 1. Characterizing Single Word Impairments

    Rita Sloan Berndt;Charlotte C. Mitchum;Anne N. Haendiges;Jennifer Sandson

  • Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: a review of the literature.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Rita Sloan Berndt

  • Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of language production

    Louise B. Zingeser;Rita Sloan Berndt

  • Quantitative Analysis of Aphasic Sentence Production: Further Development and New Data

    Elizabeth Rochon;Eleanor M. Saffran;Rita Sloan Berndt;Myrna F. Schwartz

  • Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis

    Rita Sloan Berndt;Charlotte C. Mitchum;Anne N. Haendiges

  • An investigation of repetition and language processing in a case of conduction aphasia.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Annamaria G. Basili;Jerry J. Koller;Rita Sloan Berndt

  • Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing.

    Rita Sloan Berndt;Anne N. Haendiges;Charlotte C. Mitchum;Jennifer Sandson

  • Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in english

    Rita Sloan Berndt;James A. Reggia;Charlotte C. Mitchum

  • The selective impairment of phonological processing: A case study☆

    Alfonso Caramazza;Rita Sloan Berndt;Annamaria G Basili

  • The semantic deficit hypothesis: Perceptual parsing and object classification by aphasic patients ☆

    Alfonso Caramazza;Rita Sloan Berndt;Hiram H. Brownell

  • Agrammatic Broca's aphasia is not associated with a single pattern of comprehension performance

    Alfonso Caramazza;Erminio Capitani;Arnaud Rey;Rita S. Berndt

  • Modality-specific processing streams in verbal working memory: evidence from spatio-temporal patterns of brain activity

    Daniel S Ruchkin;Rita S Berndt;Ray Johnson;Walter Ritter

  • A Multicomponent Deficit View of Agrammatic Broca's Aphasia

    Alfonso Caramazza;Rita Sloan Berndt

  • Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: their effects are independent

    R.S. Berndt;A.N. Haendiges;M.W. Burton;C.C. Mitchum

  • Syntactic processing deficits in aphasia.

    Alfonso Caramazza;Rita Sloan Berndt;annamaria G. Basili;Jerry J. Koller

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
James A. Reggia
James A. Reggia University of Maryland, College Park
Jordan Grafman
Jordan Grafman Northwestern University
Myrna F. Schwartz
Myrna F. Schwartz Temple University
Thomas R. Price
Thomas R. Price University of Maryland, Baltimore
Walter Ritter
Walter Ritter Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Ray Johnson
Ray Johnson Queens College, CUNY
Eleanor M. Saffran
Eleanor M. Saffran Temple University
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a variety of fulfilling careers, including school counseling. Becoming a school counselor often requires meeting specific state-level educational and certification standards. For example, the Virginia school counselor certification requirements outline necessary graduate coursework and clinical internships. These steps help ensure that aspiring counselors are fully prepared to support students’ academic and emotional needs.

Similarly, those interested in working in other states will find varying pathways. The Washington school counselor education requirements emphasize state-approved programs and licensure exams. In West Virginia, following the West Virginia school counselor certification requirements is crucial for eligibility. Meanwhile, the Wisconsin school counselor education requirements detail both pre-service training and ongoing professional development.

Selecting the right online degree can set you on the path toward meeting your state's requirements. Before enrolling, always review the specific regulations for the state where you plan to practice, as requirements and career pathways can differ significantly.

Best Scientists Citing Rita Sloan Berndt

Recently Published Articles