World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
14503
World Ranking
6302
National Ranking
2742

Ray Johnson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Johnson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ray Johnson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray Johnson is affiliated with Queens College, CUNY in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, and cultural studies.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Japanese History and Culture
  • Asian Culture and Media Studies
  • Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics

Ray Johnson has contributed to scholarly discourse through publications in various venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cortex
  • InVisible Culture

Recent papers authored by Ray Johnson are as follows:

  • Temporal dynamics of attitude decisions: A test of the iterative reprocessing model using event-related potentials, 2023, Cortex
  • Temporal Dynamics of Attitude Decisions: A Test of the Iterative Reprocessing Model using Event-related Potentials, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Temporal Dynamics of Attitude Decisions: A Test of the Iterative Reprocessing Model using Event-related Potentials, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Book Review: Anime's Knowledge Cultures: Geek, Otaku, Zhai, 2025, InVisible Culture

Collaborative work features frequently with three coauthors, each appearing in multiple projects with Johnson:

  • Heather Henkell
  • Elizabeth Simon
  • Jianjun Zhu

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria

    Terence W. Picton;S. Bentin;P. Berg;E. Donchin

  • A Triarchic Model of P300 Amplitude

    Ray Johnson

  • Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review.

    David Friedman;Ray Johnson

  • On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential

    Ray Johnson

  • Current trends in event-related potential research

    Ray Johnson;John W. Rohrbaugh;R. Parasuraman

  • Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Ray Johnson;Jordan Grafman;Howard Canoune

  • Toward a Functional Categorization of Slow Waves

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Ray Johnson;David Mahaffey;Samuel Sutton

  • P300 and Long-Term Memory: Latency Predicts Recognition Performance

    Ray Johnson;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Bert S. Kopell

  • P300 and Stimulus Categorization: Two Plus One is not so Different from One Plus One

    Ray Johnson;Emanuel Donchin

  • Short-term memory storage and retention: an event-related brain potential study.

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Ray Johnson;Howard Canoune;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter

  • Developmental Evidence for Modality‐Dependent P300 Generators: A Normative Study

    Ray Johnson

  • On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli

    Ray E. Johnson Jr.;Emanuel Donchin

  • Differential amygdala activation during emotional decision and recognition memory tasks using unpleasant words: an fMRI study

    Matthias H Tabert;Joan C Borod;Joan C Borod;Cheuk Y Tang;Cheuk Y Tang;Gudrun Lange

  • Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials.

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Howard L. Canoune;Ray Johnson;Walter Ritter

  • Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications

    John W. Rohrbaugh;R. Parasuraman;Ray Johnson

  • Second Thoughts: Multiple P300s Elicited by a Single Stimulus

    Ray Johnson;Emanuel Donchin

  • Somatosensory event-related potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effects of attention.

    Wolfgang Miltner;Ray Johnson;Christoph Braun;Wolfgang Larbig

  • Scalp-recorded P300 activity in patients following unilateral temporal lobectomy.

    Ray Johnson

  • Auditory and visual P300s in temporal lobectomy patients: evidence for modality-dependent generators.

    Ray Johnson

  • Manipulation of P3 latency: Speed vs. accuracy instructions

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Judith Ford;Judith Ford;Ray Johnson;Ray Johnson;Brant Wenegrat;Brant Wenegrat

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter Ritter
Walter Ritter Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
David Friedman
David Friedman Columbia University
Jordan Grafman
Jordan Grafman Northwestern University
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida
Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
Joan C. Borod
Joan C. Borod City University of New York
Raja Parasuraman
Raja Parasuraman George Mason University
Rita Sloan Berndt
Rita Sloan Berndt University of Maryland, Baltimore
Marta Kutas
Marta Kutas University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ray Johnson

Recently Published Articles