World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
78
Citations
25725
World Ranking
1749
National Ranking
848

Walter Ritter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Ritter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 148 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Walter Ritter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Ritter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Walter Ritter is affiliated with the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research in the United States.

Their research spans several main fields of study, including Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Arts and Humanities. These fields are further detailed within various subfields such as Museology, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Clinical Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their work addresses a variety of interconnected topics, which include:

  • Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine

Walter Ritter has contributed to academic publications, notably with a paper titled Issue Information published in 2020 in the European Journal of Neuroscience.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Katrin Paldán (3 collaborations)
  • Andreas Künz (2 collaborations)
  • Guido Kempter (2 collaborations)
  • Mathias Gort (1 collaboration)
  • Daire Ó Broin (1 collaboration)

The European Journal of Neuroscience is a known venue for their publications.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria

    Terence W. Picton;S. Bentin;P. Berg;E. Donchin

  • Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Micah M Murray;Daniel C Javitt;Daniel C Javitt

  • COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP

    Emanuel Donchin;W. Ritter;C. McCallum

  • The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp

    Herbert G. Vaughan;Walter Ritter

  • Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: A study of short terms changes in average evoked responses

    Walter Ritter;Herbert G. Vaughan;Louis D. Costa

  • Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river.

    Terence W. Picton;Claude Alain;Leun Otten;Walter Ritter

  • Topography of the human motor potential

    Herbert G Vaughan;Louis D Costa;Walter Ritter

  • Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks.

    Walter Ritter;Richard Simson;Herbert G. Vaughan

  • The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks

    Richard Simson;Herbert G Vaughan;Walter Ritter

  • A Brain Event Related to the Making of a Sensory Discrimination.

    Walter Ritter;Richard Simson;Herbert G. Vaughan;David Friedman

  • Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment.

    Micah M. Murray;Sophie Molholm;Christoph M. Michel;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: An fMRI study

    John J. Foxe;Glenn R. Wylie;Antigona Martinez;Antigona Martinez;Charles E. Schroeder

  • Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt;John J. Foxe

  • The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks ☆

    Richard Simson;Herbert G Vaughan;Walter Ritter

  • Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task.

    Gerald P. Novak;Walter Ritter;Herbert G. Vaughan;Max L. Wiznitzer

  • The Neural Circuitry of Pre-attentive Auditory Change-detection: An fMRI Study of Pitch and Duration Mismatch Negativity generators

    Sophie Molholm;Antigona Martinez;Walter Ritter;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Impaired Mismatch Negativity Generation Reflects Widespread Dysfunction of Working Memory in Schizophrenia

    Daniel C. Javitt;Paolina Doneshka;Sandra Grochowski;Walter Ritter

  • Manipulation of Event-Related Potential Manifestations of Information Processing Stages

    Walter Ritter;Richard Simson;Herbert G. Vaughan;Michael Macht

  • Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study

    Daniel S. Ruchkin;Ray Johnson;Jordan Grafman;Howard Canoune

  • Averaged Evoked Responses in Vigilance and Discrimination: A Reassessment

    Walter Ritter;Herbert G. Vaughan

  • Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination.

    Walter Ritter;Richard Simson;Herbert G Vaughan

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert G. Vaughan
Herbert G. Vaughan Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Sophie Molholm
Sophie Molholm Albert Einstein College of Medicine
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
David Friedman
David Friedman Columbia University
Elyse Sussman
Elyse Sussman Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ray Johnson
Ray Johnson Queens College, CUNY
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Walter Ritter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles