World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
11735
World Ranking
5061
National Ranking
2266

Sophie Molholm publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sophie Molholm sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sophie Molholm D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sophie Molholm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sophie Molholm is affiliated with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and sensory systems.

The scientist has contributed to various fields of study including:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Genetics
  • Sensory Systems

Their main research topics address:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Congenital heart defects research

Sophie Molholm has published extensively in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • NeuroImage
  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Molholm are:

  • Timing of the Diagnosis of Autism in African American Children, 2020, PEDIATRICS
  • Linear Modeling of Neurophysiological Responses to Speech and Other Continuous Stimuli: Methodological Considerations for Applied Research, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Operating in a Multisensory Context: Assessing the Interplay Between Multisensory Reaction Time Facilitation and Inter-sensory Task-switching Effects, 2020, Neuroscience
  • Atypical processing of tones and phonemes in Rett Syndrome as biomarkers of disease progression, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Aging-related changes in cortical mechanisms supporting postural control during base of support and optic flow manipulations, 2020, European Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • John J. Foxe
  • Edward G. Freedman
  • Ana A. Francisco
  • Douwe J. Horsthuis
  • Michael J. Crosse

Best Publications

  • Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Micah M Murray;Daniel C Javitt;Daniel C Javitt

  • Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment.

    Micah M. Murray;Sophie Molholm;Christoph M. Michel;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt;John J. Foxe

  • The Neural Circuitry of Pre-attentive Auditory Change-detection: An fMRI Study of Pitch and Duration Mismatch Negativity generators

    Sophie Molholm;Antigona Martinez;Walter Ritter;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness

    Robert Hester;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Sophie Molholm;Marina Shpaner

  • Severe Multisensory Speech Integration Deficits in High-Functioning School-Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Their Resolution During Early Adolescence

    John J. Foxe;Sophie Molholm;Victor A. Del Bene;Hans Peter Frey

  • The Development of Multisensory Integration in High-Functioning Autism: High-Density Electrical Mapping and Psychophysical Measures Reveal Impairments in the Processing of Audiovisual Inputs

    Alice B. Brandwein;John J. Foxe;John S. Butler;Natalie N. Russo

  • Audio-visual multisensory integration in superior parietal lobule revealed by human intracranial recordings

    Sophie Molholm;Pejman Sehatpour;Ashesh D. Mehta;Marina Shpaner;Marina Shpaner

  • A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal–occipital–hippocampal brain network during visual object processing

    Pejman Sehatpour;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Theodore H. Schwartz;Jeannette R. Mahoney

  • Neurophysiological Indices of Atypical Auditory Processing and Multisensory Integration are Associated with Symptom Severity in Autism

    Alice B. Brandwein;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John S. Butler;John S. Butler;Hans Peter Frey

  • Oscillatory Alpha-Band Mechanisms and the Deployment of Spatial Attention to Anticipated Auditory and Visual Target Locations: Supramodal or Sensory-Specific Control Mechanisms?

    Snigdha Banerjee;Adam C. Snyder;Adam C. Snyder;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe

  • The development of auditory attention in children.

    Hilary Gomes;Sophie Molholm;Christopher Christodoulou;Walter Ritter

  • Impaired multisensory processing in schizophrenia: deficits in the visual enhancement of speech comprehension under noisy environmental conditions.

    Lars A. Ross;Lars A. Ross;Lars A. Ross;Dave Saint-Amour;Dave Saint-Amour;Victoria M. Leavitt;Victoria M. Leavitt;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm

  • The anterior cingulate and error avoidance.

    Elena Magno;John J. Foxe;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Ian H. Robertson

  • Timing of the Diagnosis of Autism in African American Children

    John N. Constantino;Anna M. Abbacchi;Celine Saulnier;Cheryl Klaiman

  • Multisensory processing in children with autism: high-density electrical mapping of auditory–somatosensory integration

    Natalie Russo;Natalie Russo;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Alice B. Brandwein;Alice B. Brandwein;Ted Altschuler;Ted Altschuler

  • The Development of Audiovisual Multisensory Integration Across Childhood and Early Adolescence: A High-Density Electrical Mapping Study

    Alice B. Brandwein;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Natalie N. Russo;Ted S. Altschuler

  • Oscillatory sensory selection mechanisms during intersensory attention to rhythmic auditory and visual inputs: a human electrocorticographic investigation.

    Manuel Gomez-Ramirez;Simon P. Kelly;Simon P. Kelly;Sophie Molholm;Pejman Sehatpour

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: an integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of "closure" processes.

    Pejman Sehatpour;Sophie Molholm;Daniel C. Javitt;Daniel C. Javitt;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe

  • The development of multisensory speech perception continues into the late childhood years.

    Lars A. Ross;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Daniella Blanco;Daniella Blanco;Manuel Gomez-Ramirez

  • Differences in early sensory-perceptual processing in synesthesia: a visual evoked potential study.

    Kylie J. Barnett;John J. Foxe;Sophie Molholm;Simon P. Kelly

  • Seeing voices: High-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion

    Dave Saint-Amour;Pierfilippo De Sanctis;Sophie Molholm;Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Walter Ritter
Walter Ritter Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
Theodore H. Schwartz
Theodore H. Schwartz Cornell University
Simon P. Kelly
Simon P. Kelly University College Dublin
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont
Antigona Martinez
Antigona Martinez Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Rosalyn J. Moran
Rosalyn J. Moran King's College London
Richard B. Reilly
Richard B. Reilly Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to neuroscience can open diverse and rewarding career opportunities. While neuroscience itself is a highly specialized field, allied disciplines such as psychology, biology, and healthcare administration are also in demand. If your goal is to increase your earning potential, consider reviewing what degrees make the most money. These disciplines often overlap with neuroscience and could provide lucrative career options.

For students concerned about cost, many cheap online colleges that accept fafsa offer accredited programs in related fields, helping you minimize student debt while still accessing quality education.

Additionally, upgrading your expertise with online courses with certificates can supplement your degree and boost your job prospects in specialized areas of neuroscience or healthcare.

If you seek a quicker path into the workforce, you might investigate easiest online degrees in allied health, psychology, or life sciences. These options can provide foundational knowledge and entry-level opportunities that lead to specialized roles or further study in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Sophie Molholm

Trending Scientists