World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
22978
World Ranking
2377
National Ranking
54

Micah M. Murray publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micah M. Murray sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 247 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Micah M. Murray D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Micah M. Murray sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Micah M. Murray is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience and medicine. Their work spans 65 publications in neuroscience and 38 in medicine, with particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and sensory systems.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Tactile and sensory interactions
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Infant development and preterm care
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies

Micah M. Murray has published in a variety of venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Topography
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Current Research in Neurobiology
  • npj Science of Learning

Significant publications include:

  • The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, 2021, Nature Physics
  • Mitochondrial, exosomal miR137-COX6A2 and gamma synchrony as biomarkers of parvalbumin interneurons, psychopathology, and neurocognition in schizophrenia, 2021, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Multisensory Gains in Simple Detection Predict Global Cognition in Schoolchildren, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Kinematic and Somatosensory Gains in Infants with Cerebral Palsy After a Multi-Component Upper-Extremity Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Brain Topography
  • Neonatal Multisensory Processing in Preterm and Term Infants Predicts Sensory Reactivity and Internalizing Tendencies in Early Childhood, 2020, Brain Topography

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Benedetta Franceschiello
  • Chrysa Retsa
  • Ruxandra I. Tivadar
  • Paweł J. Matusz
  • Astrid Minier

Best Publications

  • EEG source imaging

    Christoph M. Michel;Micah M. Murray;Göran Lantz;Sara Gonzalez

  • Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review

    Micah M. Murray;Denis Brunet;Christoph M. Michel

  • Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

    Sophie Molholm;Walter Ritter;Walter Ritter;Micah M Murray;Daniel C Javitt;Daniel C Javitt

  • The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems

    Federico Battiston;Enrico Amico;Enrico Amico;Alain Barrat;Ginestra Bianconi;Ginestra Bianconi

  • Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL

    Denis Brunet;Micah M. Murray;Christoph M. Michel

  • Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool

    Christoph M. Michel;Micah M. Murray

  • Search for invisible decays of Higgs bosons in the vector boson fusion and associated ZH production modes

    S. Chatrchyan;V. Khachatryan;A. M. Sirunyan;A. Tumasyan

  • Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping.

    John J Foxe;John J Foxe;Istvan A Morocz;Micah M Murray;Micah M Murray;Beth A Higgins

  • Grabbing your ear: rapid auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in low-level sensory cortices are not constrained by stimulus alignment.

    Micah M. Murray;Sophie Molholm;Christoph M. Michel;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: An fMRI study

    John J. Foxe;Glenn R. Wylie;Antigona Martinez;Antigona Martinez;Charles E. Schroeder

  • Glutathione precursor, N-acetyl-cysteine, improves mismatch negativity in schizophrenia patients.

    Suzie Lavoie;Micah M Murray;Patricia Deppen;Maria G Knyazeva

  • Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints.

    Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez;Micah M. Murray;Christoph M. Michel;Roberto Martuzzi

  • Impaired Visual Object Recognition and Dorsal/Ventral Stream Interaction in Schizophrenia

    Glen M. Doniger;John J. Foxe;Micah M. Murray;Beth A. Higgins

  • The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes

    Micah M. Murray;Mark T. Wallace

  • The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Illusory Contour Processing: Combined High-Density Electrical Mapping, Source Analysis, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Micah M. Murray;Glenn R. Wylie;Beth A. Higgins;Daniel C. Javitt

  • Multisensory Interactions within Human Primary Cortices Revealed by BOLD Dynamics

    Roberto Martuzzi;Roberto Martuzzi;Micah M. Murray;Christoph M. Michel;Jean-Philippe Thiran

  • Attention-dependent suppression of distracter visual input can be cross-modally cued as indexed by anticipatory parieto–occipital alpha-band oscillations

    Kai Ming G. Fu;John J. Foxe;John J. Foxe;Micah M. Murray;Micah M. Murray;Beth A. Higgins

  • Activation Timecourse of Ventral Visual Stream Object-recognition Areas: High Density Electrical Mapping of Perceptual Closure Processes

    Glen M. Doniger;John J. Foxe;Micah M. Murray;Beth A. Higgins

  • Multisensory Integration: Flexible Use of General Operations

    Nienke van Atteveldt;Nienke van Atteveldt;Nienke van Atteveldt;Micah M. Murray;Gregor Thut;Charles E. Schroeder

  • Connectivity differences in brain networks.

    Andrew Zalesky;Luca Cocchi;Alex Fornito;Micah M Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie Clarke
Stephanie Clarke University Hospital of Lausanne
Christoph M. Michel
Christoph M. Michel University of Geneva
John J. Foxe
John J. Foxe University of Rochester
Daniel C. Javitt
Daniel C. Javitt Columbia University
Mark T. Wallace
Mark T. Wallace Vanderbilt University
Gregor Thut
Gregor Thut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Vincenzo Romei
Vincenzo Romei University of Bologna
Reto Meuli
Reto Meuli University of Lausanne
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Micah M. Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles