World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 4991 4854 2318 2239 109 15144

Boqing Gong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Boqing Gong between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Boqing Gong published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 36 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 16 publications
2009 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Boqing Gong: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 2
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 3
2014 3
2015 1
2016 8
2017 8
2018 15
2019 16
2020 11
2021 27
2022 9
2023 15
2024 20
2025 16
Total 156
Download as CSV

Boqing Gong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boqing Gong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 109 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 109
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Boqing Gong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boqing Gong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Boqing Gong is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States. Their primary area of expertise lies within computer science, with a particular focus on computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, and related subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, computational mechanics, and aerospace engineering.

Their work spans a range of topics including domain adaptation and few-shot learning, multimodal machine learning applications, advanced neural network applications, human pose and action recognition, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI, adversarial robustness in machine learning, and generative adversarial networks and image synthesis.

Boqing Gong has contributed numerous scholarly papers published mainly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • PubMed
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Among the recent papers, key publications include:

  • "VATT: Transformers for Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning from Raw Video, Audio and Text," published in 2021 in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Contrastive Learning for Label Efficient Semantic Segmentation," published in 2021 at the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
  • "When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentations," published in 2021 in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Smooth Adversarial Training," published in 2020 in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Spatiotemporal Contrastive Video Representation Learning," published in 2020 in arXiv (Cornell University)

Boqing Gong has frequently collaborated with a number of co-authors, including Ming-Hsuan Yang, Yandong Li, Liangzhe Yuan, Hartwig Adam, and Liqiang Wang. These collaborations contribute to a broad and diverse research network within their fields.

Best Publications

  • Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation

    Boqing Gong;Yuan Shi;Fei Sha;Kristen Grauman

  • Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open World

    Ziwei Liu;Zhongqi Miao;Xiaohang Zhan;Jiayun Wang

  • Synthesized Classifiers for Zero-Shot Learning

    Soravit Changpinyo;Wei-Lun Chao;Boqing Gong;Fei Sha

  • An Empirical Study and Analysis of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning for Object Recognition in the Wild

    Wei-Lun Chao;Soravit Changpinyo;Boqing Gong;Fei Sha

  • Curriculum Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Urban Scenes

    Yang Zhang;Philip David;Boqing Gong

  • PolarNet: An Improved Grid Representation for Online LiDAR Point Clouds Semantic Segmentation

    Yang Zhang;Zixiang Zhou;Philip David;Xiangyu Yue

  • Connecting the Dots with Landmarks: Discriminatively Learning Domain-Invariant Features for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

    Boqing Gong;Kristen Grauman;Fei Sha

  • Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognition

    Cihang Xie;Mingxing Tan;Boqing Gong;Jiang Wang

  • Spatiotemporal Contrastive Video Representation Learning

    Rui Qian;Tianjian Meng;Boqing Gong;Ming-Hsuan Yang

  • Diverse Sequential Subset Selection for Supervised Video Summarization

    Boqing Gong;Wei-Lun Chao;Kristen Grauman;Fei Sha

  • A Fast and Accurate One-Stage Approach to Visual Grounding

    Zhengyuan Yang;Boqing Gong;Liwei Wang;Wenbing Huang

  • Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency: Simulation-to-Real Generalization Without Accessing Target Domain Data

    Xiangyu Yue;Yang Zhang;Sicheng Zhao;Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli

  • VATT: Transformers for Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning from Raw Video, Audio and Text

    Hassan Akbari;Liangzhe Yuan;Rui Qian;Wei-Hong Chuang

  • Rethinking Class-Balanced Methods for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition From a Domain Adaptation Perspective

    Muhammad Abdullah Jamal;Matthew Brown;Ming-Hsuan Yang;Liqiang Wang

  • End-to-End Learning of Motion Representation for Video Understanding

    Lijie Fan;Wenbing Huang;Chuang Gan;Stefano Ermon

  • MoViNets: Mobile Video Networks for Efficient Video Recognition

    Dan Kondratyuk;Liangzhe Yuan;Yandong Li;Li Zhang

  • Improving the Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs: A Consistency Term and Its Dual Effect

    Xiang Wei;Boqing Gong;Zixia Liu;Wei Lu

  • Learning Attributes Equals Multi-Source Domain Generalization

    Chuang Gan;Tianbao Yang;Boqing Gong

  • Constructing Self-Motivated Pyramid Curriculums for Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation: A Non-Adversarial Approach

    Qing Lian;Lixin Duan;Fengmao Lv;Boqing Gong

  • Contrastive Learning for Label Efficient Semantic Segmentation

    Xiangyun Zhao;Raviteja Vemulapalli;Philip Andrew Mansfield;Boqing Gong

  • NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networks

    Yandong Li;Lijun Li;Liqiang Wang;Tong Zhang

  • Constructing Self-motivated Pyramid Curriculums for Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation: A Non-Adversarial Approach

    Qing Lian;Fengmao Lv;Lixin Duan;Boqing Gong

Frequent Co-Authors

Fei Sha
Fei Sha Facebook (United States)
Chuang Gan
Chuang Gan University of Massachusetts Amherst
Wei-Lun Chao
Wei-Lun Chao Boston University
Deliang Fan
Deliang Fan Johns Hopkins University
Tianbao Yang
Tianbao Yang Texas A&M University
Mubarak Shah
Mubarak Shah University of Central Florida
Kristen Grauman
Kristen Grauman The University of Texas at Austin
Wenbing Huang
Wenbing Huang Renmin University of China
Ming-Hsuan Yang
Ming-Hsuan Yang University of California, Merced
Cho-Jui Hsieh
Cho-Jui Hsieh University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science online in the USA offers flexible options for students with different backgrounds and goals. Many institutions are committed to keeping education accessible, with most affordable online colleges providing a quality education that doesn’t break the bank. These programs help you gain marketable skills while minimizing student debt.

If you are worried about academic prerequisites, there are universities for low gpa that are welcoming to non-traditional applicants or those with lower GPAs. This makes getting started on your Computer Science career more accessible than ever.

For those interested in branching out, skills learned in Computer Science frequently overlap with fields like environmental analysis and sustainability. Find out what opportunities await with an environmental science degree—many career paths benefit from cross-disciplinary tech expertise.

Time-sensitive learners can take advantage of fastest computer science degree options. Accelerated degrees help you quickly enter or advance in the job market. Explore these online pathways to customize your education and build a rewarding technology career.

Best Scientists Citing Boqing Gong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles