World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
12860
World Ranking
3842
National Ranking
336

Rolf Verleger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rolf Verleger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 191 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Rolf Verleger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rolf Verleger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rolf Verleger is affiliated with the University of Lübeck in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a notable concentration in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist has contributed to several topics in their field, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Verleger's recent published work includes the following papers:

  • Effects of relevance and response frequency on P3b amplitudes: Review of findings and comparison of hypotheses about the process reflected by P3b (2020) in Psychophysiology
  • No effect of target probability on P3b amplitudes (2020) in International Journal of Psychophysiology

Their publications span key journals such as Psychophysiology and the International Journal of Psychophysiology, reflecting an emphasis on studies involving brain potentials and psychophysiological metrics.

Frequent collaborators of Rolf Verleger include Edmund Wascher, Stefan Arnau, Daniel Schneider, Katharina Hoppe, and Stephan Getzmann. These collaborations suggest active engagement with research groups focused on cognitive and experimental psychology topics.

Best Publications

  • Sleep inspires insight

    Ullrich Wagner;Steffen Gais;Hilde Haider;Rolf Verleger

  • Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3

    Rolf Verleger

  • On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry.

    Rolf Verleger

  • Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception

    Rolf Verleger;Piotr Jaskowski;Edmund Wascher

  • Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. I. Analysis of band power

    Theo Gasser;Rolf Verleger;Petra Bächer;Lothar Sroka

  • Aging and the Simon task.

    Robert Henricus Johannes van der Lubbe;Robert Henricus Johannes van der Lubbe;Rolf Verleger

  • Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions

    Rolf Verleger;Wolfgang Heide;Christian Butt;Detlef Kömpf

  • Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task.

    Edmund Wascher;Ulf Schatz;Thomas Kuder;Rolf Verleger

  • Correction of EOG artifacts in event-related potentials of the EEG: aspects of reliability and validity.

    Rolf Verleger;Theo Gasser;Joachim Möcks

  • Development of the EEG of school-age children and adolescents. II. Topography.

    Theo Gasser;Christine Jennen-Steinmetz;Lothar Sroka;Rolf Verleger

  • Effects of relevance and response frequency on P3b amplitudes: Review of findings and comparison of hypotheses about the process reflected by P3b.

    Rolf Verleger

  • Qualitative Differences Between Conscious and Nonconscious Processing? On Inverse Priming Induced by Masked Arrows.

    Rolf Verleger;Piotr Jaśkowski;Aytaç Aydemir;Rob H. J. van der Lubbe

  • CNV and temporal uncertainty with 'ageing' and 'non-ageing' S1-S2 intervals.

    Peter Trillenberg;Rolf Verleger;Edmund Wascher;Bernd Wauschkuhn

  • Traces Left on Visual Selective Attention by Stimuli That Are Not Consciously Identified

    Piotr Jaśkowski;Piotr Jaśkowski;Robert Henricus Johannes van der Lubbe;Robert Henricus Johannes van der Lubbe;Erik Schlotterbeck;Rolf Verleger

  • Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)

    Rolf Verleger;Marvin F. Metzner;Guang Ouyang;Kamila Śmigasiewicz

  • Effects of certainty, modality shift and guess outcome on evoked potentials and reaction times in chronic schizophrenics

    Rolf Verleger;Rudolf Cohen

  • The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes.

    Rolf Verleger

  • Amplitudes and latencies of single-trial ERP's estimated by a maximum-likelihood method

    Unknown

  • How the Self Controls Its Automatic Pilot when Processing Subliminal Information

    Piotr Jáskowski;Blandyna Skalska;Rolf Verleger

  • Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: A note on misallocation of variance☆

    Joachim Möcks;Rolf Verleger

  • On the reasons for the delay of P3 latency in healthy elderly subjects

    Rolf Verleger;Winfried Neukäter;Detlef Kömpf;Peter Vieregge

Frequent Co-Authors

Detlef Kömpf
Detlef Kömpf University of Lübeck
Vasil Kolev
Vasil Kolev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Edmund Wascher
Edmund Wascher TU Dortmund University
Juliana Yordanova
Juliana Yordanova Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Wolfgang Heide
Wolfgang Heide Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle
Jan Born
Jan Born University of Tübingen
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski RWTH Aachen University
Andreas Sprenger
Andreas Sprenger University of Lübeck
Martin Schürmann
Martin Schürmann University of Nottingham
Christine Klein
Christine Klein University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to a variety of related fields, many of which offer flexible online education options. For those interested in social support roles, msw programs online provide a pathway to become a licensed social worker, integrating brain science and social impact.

Students interested in behavioral interventions may pursue bcba masters programs online, focusing on applied behavior analysis—a discipline with strong ties to neuroscience foundations. These programs are ideal for those seeking credentials in behavior-focused therapy and support.

If you want to accelerate your studies, consider accelerated social work programs, which allow you to complete your master’s degree in less time and quickly enter the workforce. These fast-tracked degrees often include coursework relevant to neuroscience principles.

Those interested in a psychological perspective can opt for a 2 year psychology degree online. These programs offer foundational knowledge in cognition, behavior, and mental health—all complementary to neuroscience.

Each of these online degrees enhances your understanding of the brain and behavior, providing versatile career pathways connected to neuroscience education.

Best Scientists Citing Rolf Verleger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles