World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
8366
World Ranking
5286
National Ranking
249

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
8433
World Ranking
5577
National Ranking
471

Edmund Wascher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Wascher sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edmund Wascher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmund Wascher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edmund Wascher is affiliated with TU Dortmund University in Germany and has a significant publication record primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their work addresses a wide range of topics, prominently including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Edmund Wascher has contributed to research published in various venues, with frequent publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychophysiology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Scientific Reports
  • European Journal of Neuroscience

Some recent papers include:

  • Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses (2020, Archives of Toxicology)
  • Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer's disease risk carriers (2020, Science Advances)
  • Inter-trial alpha power indicates mind wandering (2020, Psychophysiology)
  • Frontal and parietal EEG alpha asymmetry: a large-scale investigation of short-term reliability on distinct EEG systems (2021, Brain Structure and Function)
  • Cognitive-motor interference in the wild: Assessing the effects of movement complexity on task switching using mobile EEG (2020, European Journal of Neuroscience)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Edmund Wascher include:

  • Stephan Getzmann
  • Daniel Schneider
  • Stefan Arnau
  • Patrick D. Gajewski
  • Laura-Isabelle Klatt

Best Publications

  • Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception

    Rolf Verleger;Piotr Jaskowski;Edmund Wascher

  • Frontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue.

    Edmund Wascher;Björn Rasch;Jessica Sänger;Sven Hoffmann

  • Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Coacting Individuals

    Natalie Sebanz;Günther Knoblich;Wolfgang Prinz;Edmund Wascher

  • The influence of acute stress on attention mechanisms and its electrophysiological correlates.

    Jessica Sänger;Laura Bechtold;Daniela Schoofs;Meinolf Blaszkewicz

  • Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task.

    Edmund Wascher;Ulf Schatz;Thomas Kuder;Rolf Verleger

  • Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses.

    Sabine Guth;Stephanie Hüser;Angelika Roth;Gisela Degen

  • The Effects of Time on Task in Response Selection - An ERP Study of Mental Fatigue

    Tina Möckel;Christian Beste;Edmund Wascher

  • The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG.

    Edmund Wascher;Bernd Wauschkuhn

  • Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect

    Katrin Wiegand;Edmund Wascher

  • Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection

    Florian Waszak;Edmund Wascher;Peter E. Keller;Iring Koch

  • What Does the n-Back Task Measure as We Get Older? Relations Between Working-Memory Measures and Other Cognitive Functions Across the Lifespan.

    Patrick D. Gajewski;Eva Hanisch;Michael Falkenstein;Sven Thönes

  • CNV and temporal uncertainty with 'ageing' and 'non-ageing' S1-S2 intervals.

    Peter Trillenberg;Rolf Verleger;Edmund Wascher;Bernd Wauschkuhn

  • Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

    Anne Bierbrauer;Lukas Kunz;Carlos A. Gomes;Maike Luhmann

  • Improvement and impairment of visually guided behavior through LTP- and LTD-like exposure-based visual learning.

    Christian Beste;Edmund Wascher;Onur Güntürkün;Hubert R. Dinse

  • Towards the measurement of event-related EEG activity in real-life working environments.

    Edmund Wascher;Holger Heppner;Sven Hoffmann

  • Visuo-spatial processing and the N1 component of the ERP.

    Edmund Wascher;Sven Hoffmann;Jessica Sänger;Marc Grosjean

  • Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: an EEG study of inhibition of return.

    Edmund Wascher;Steven P. Tipper

  • Tuning perceptual competition.

    Edmund Wascher;Christian Beste

  • Recording mobile EEG in an outdoor environment reveals cognitive-motor interference dependent on movement complexity

    Julian Elias Reiser;Edmund Wascher;Stefan Arnau

  • Inter-trial alpha power indicates mind wandering.

    Stefan Arnau;Christoph Löffler;Jan Rummel;Dirk Hagemann

  • Spatial S-R Compatibility with Centrally Presented Stimuli: An Event-Related Asymmetry Study on Dimensional Overlap

    Edmund Wascher;Meike Reinhard;Bernd Wauschkuhn;Rolf Verleger

  • Lateralized Human Cortical Activity for Shifting Visuospatial Attention and Initiating Saccades

    Bernd Wauschkuhn;Rolf Verleger;Edmund Wascher;Wolfgang Klostermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Verleger
Rolf Verleger University of Lübeck
Michael Falkenstein
Michael Falkenstein TU Dortmund University
Detlef Kömpf
Detlef Kömpf University of Lübeck
Jörg Lewald
Jörg Lewald Ruhr University Bochum
Dirk Hagemann
Dirk Hagemann Heidelberg University
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Wolfgang Heide
Wolfgang Heide Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle
Florian Waszak
Florian Waszak Université Paris Cité
David A. Rosenbaum
David A. Rosenbaum University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens up a world of academic and professional opportunities. Many students today are considering most profitable degrees to ensure a solid return on investment. Neuroscience is recognized among fields that lead to diverse and rewarding career options, especially when combined with expertise in data science or pre-med tracks.

For those seeking flexibility, online study is increasingly popular. In fact, you can find quality programs from online schools that accept fafsa, making your education more affordable with federal aid options. Additionally, pursuing what certificates can i get online may help advance your skills or job prospects without the long-term commitment of a degree.

If budget and time are concerns, look into the cheapest easiest online degree options to get started quickly. Whether you’re looking for a full degree, certification, or simply exploring the best mix of flexibility and earnings potential, these resources are a great next step in your neuroscience journey.

Best Scientists Citing Edmund Wascher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles