World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
7220
World Ranking
9730
National Ranking
463

Dirk Hagemann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Hagemann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dirk Hagemann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Hagemann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung

    Gerhard Stemmler;Dirk Hagemann;Manfred Amelang;Frank M. Spinath

  • Several daily measurements are necessary to reliably assess the cortisol rise after awakening: State- and trait components

    J. Hellhammer;E. Fries;O.W. Schweisthal;W. Schlotz

  • A revised film set for the induction of basic emotions.

    Johannes Hewig;Dirk Hagemann;Jan Seifert;Mario Gollwitzer

  • Central and autonomic nervous system integration in emotion.

    Dirk Hagemann;Shari R. Waldstein;Shari R. Waldstein;Julian F. Thayer

  • The quest for the EEG reference revisited: A glance from brain asymmetry research

    Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Julian F. Thayer

  • Does resting electroencephalograph asymmetry reflect a trait? an application of latent state-trait theory.

    Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Julian F. Thayer;Dieter Bartussek

  • Frontal brain asymmetry and affective style: A conceptual replication

    Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Gabriele Becker;Stefanie Maier

  • Individual differences in anterior EEG asymmetry: methodological problems and solutions.

    Dirk Hagemann

  • Stability of heart rate variability indices reflecting parasympathetic activity.

    Katja Bertsch;Katja Bertsch;Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Hartmut Schächinger

  • On the Selective Relation of Frontal Cortical Asymmetry and Anger-Out Versus Anger-Control.

    Johannes Hewig;Dirk Hagemann;Jan Seifert;Ewald Naumann

  • The effects of ocular artifacts on (lateralized) broadband power in the EEG.

    Dirk Hagemann;Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann

  • The relation of cortical activity and BIS/BAS on the trait level.

    Johannes Hewig;Dirk Hagemann;Jan Seifert;Ewald Naumann

  • The assessment of affective reactivity using films: Validity, reliability and sex differences

    Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Stefanie Maier;Gabriele Becker

  • Resting cerebral blood flow, attention, and aging

    Katja Bertsch;Dirk Hagemann;Michael Hermes;Christof Walter

  • EEG asymmetry, dispositional mood and personality

    Dirk Hagemann;Ewald Naumann;Alexander Lürken;Gabriele Becker

  • Testing the Unidimensionality of Items

    Matthias Ziegler;Dirk Hagemann

  • The latent state‐trait structure of resting EEG asymmetry: Replication and extension

    Dirk Hagemann;Johannes Hewig;Jan Seifert;Ewald Naumann

  • Beyond IQ: A latent state-trait analysis of general intelligence, dynamic decision making, and implicit learning☆

    Daniel Danner;Dirk Hagemann;Andrea Schankin;Marieke Hager

  • Individual difference variables, affective differentiation, and the structures of affect.

    Antonio Terracciano;Robert R. McCrae;Dirk Hagemann;Paul T. Costa

  • Mediation analysis with structural equation models: Combining theory, design, and statistics

    Daniel Danner;Dirk Hagemann;Klaus Fiedler

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Hewig
Johannes Hewig University of Würzburg
Andreas Voss
Andreas Voss Heidelberg University
Katja Bertsch
Katja Bertsch Heidelberg University
Joachim Funke
Joachim Funke Heidelberg University
Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine
Edmund Wascher
Edmund Wascher TU Dortmund University
Rui-Ping Xiao
Rui-Ping Xiao Peking University
Sabine C. Herpertz
Sabine C. Herpertz Heidelberg University
Klaus Fiedler
Klaus Fiedler Heidelberg University
Robert R. McCrae
Robert R. McCrae Independent Scientist / Consultant, US

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Hagemann

Recently Published Articles