World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
21059
World Ranking
1956
National Ranking
79

Klaus Fiedler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Fiedler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 296 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Klaus Fiedler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Fiedler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Fiedler is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Decision Sciences and Psychology, with a strong focus on General Decision Sciences and Cognitive Neuroscience among other subfields such as Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The research topics covered by Fiedler include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, and Religion, Society, and Development.

Fiedler's recent scholarly output includes papers published in reputable venues such as:

  • "Quo Vadis, Methodology? The Key Role of Manipulation Checks for Validity Control and Quality of Science," 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Speed-accuracy trade-offs in sample-based decisions," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Biased preferences through exploitation: How initial biases are consolidated in reward-rich environments," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Major Theories in Social Psychology," 2021, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • "Forming impressions from self-truncated samples of traits−interplay of Thurstonian and Brunswikian sampling effects," 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

In addition to journal articles, Fiedler has authored books published by notable houses, including:

  • "For the Sake of Christian Marriage, Abolish Church Weddings," 2024, Luviri Press eBooks
  • "Heuristics and Biases," 2021, The MIT Press

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Fiedler's work, with frequent co-authors including Johannes Prager, Linda McCaughey, Peter Juslin, Jerker Denrell, and Johannes Ziegler.

Fiedler has published frequently in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Best Publications

  • The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language.

    Giin R. Semin;Klaus Fiedler

  • Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Mark Conner;Filip de Fruyt;Jan De Houwer

  • The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range

    Gün R. Semin;Klaus Fiedler

  • What mediation analysis can (not) do

    Klaus Fiedler;Malte Schott;Thorsten Meiser

  • Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases.

    Klaus Fiedler

  • Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

    Klaus Fiedler;Claude Messner;Matthias Bluemke

  • Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior

    Herbert Bless;Klaus Fiedler

  • Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff: A synthesis of human and animal literatures.

    Sabine Mehlhorn;Ben R Newell;Peter M Todd;Michael D Lee

  • Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests

    Klaus Fiedler;Matthias Bluemke

  • The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors

    Unknown

  • Bimodal Interaction of Coatomer with the p24 Family of Putative Cargo Receptors

    Klaus Fiedler;Michael Veit;Mark A. Stamnes;James E. Rothman

  • Language, interaction and social cognition

    G. R. Semin;Klaus Fiedler

  • Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests – An analysis of articles published in 2015

    Klaus Fiedler;Chris Harris;Malte Schott

  • Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis.

    Christian Unkelbach;Klaus Fiedler;Myriam Bayer;Martin Stegmüller

  • The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making.

    Tilmann Betsch;Susanne Haberstroh;Andreas Glöckner;Thomas Haar

  • Voodoo Correlations Are Everywhere—Not Only in Neuroscience:

    Klaus Fiedler

  • The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper Problems With a Short-Sighted False-Positive Debate

    Klaus Fiedler;Florian Kutzner;Joachim I. Krueger

  • Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology

    Klaus Fiedler

  • Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition

    Klaus Fiedler;Peter Juslin

  • Social Cognition: How Individuals Construct Social Reality

    Rainer Greifeneder;Herbert Bless;Klaus Fiedler

  • Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments.

    Klaus Fiedler

  • Questionable research practices revisited.

    Klaus Fiedler;Norbert Schwarz

  • Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior@@@Growth Points in Cognition

    Dipankar Chakravarti;Klaus Fiedler;Joseph Forgas;Guy Claxton

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai Simons
Kai Simons Lipotype
Gün R. Semin
Gün R. Semin ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Joseph P. Forgas
Joseph P. Forgas University of New South Wales
Robert G. Parton
Robert G. Parton University of Queensland
Christian Unkelbach
Christian Unkelbach University of Cologne
Peter Juslin
Peter Juslin Uppsala University
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Martin Lotze
Martin Lotze University of Greifswald
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Psychology, several affordable online pathways can help you reach your career goals. Many students choose to further specialize with counseling degrees, which is a practical step for those interested in clinical or school counseling, mental health services, or therapy.

Online programs now offer flexibility and affordability, making it easier for students nationwide. For those living in the western U.S., there are affordable online counseling master's programs in the West that can lead to licensure and professional practice. If you’re based in the Midwest or Northeast, you might explore the cheapest online counseling degrees in Michigan, cheapest online counseling degrees in New York, and cheapest online counseling degrees in Pennsylvania.

Choosing the right online program can open doors to a range of professions, including mental health counseling, school psychology, marriage and family therapy, or substance abuse counseling. With online degrees becoming more accepted by employers, students have more options than ever to launch or advance their psychology careers affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Fiedler

Trending Scientists