World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
14577
World Ranking
2666
National Ranking
79

Roland Bobbink publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Bobbink sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 141 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Roland Bobbink D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland Bobbink sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roland Bobbink is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their research primarily addresses ecological and environmental dynamics, with a notable focus on nitrogen deposition, biodiversity, and soil ecology.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Global and Planetary Change. These areas illustrate a broad engagement with both the biotic and abiotic factors influencing ecosystems.

The recent papers authored or coauthored by Roland Bobbink demonstrate contributions to understanding nitrogen impacts, biodiversity loss, and ecological restoration. Notable publications include:

  • Towards a mechanistic understanding of the impacts of nitrogen deposition on producer-consumer interactions (2023, Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society)
  • Explanations for nitrogen decline (2022, Science)
  • Atmospheric nitrogen deposition is related to plant biodiversity loss at multiple spatial scales (2024, Global Change Biology)
  • How to Restore Invertebrate Diversity of Degraded Heathlands? A Case Study on the Reproductive Performance of the Field Cricket Gryllus campestris (L.) (2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution)
  • Soil fauna development during heathland restoration from arable land: Role of soil modification and material transplant (2022, Ecological Engineering)

Roland Bobbink has frequently collaborated with several researchers, forming coauthor relationships that include:

  • G.W.W. Wamelink
  • Joost J. Vogels
  • H. Siepel
  • Maaike Weijters
  • Rudy van Diggelen

Their work has been published in a range of venues, which include:

  • Biological Reviews/Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Global Change Biology
  • Science
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Ecological Engineering

Research topics addressed by Roland Bobbink prominently cover:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Best Publications

  • Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis.

    R. Bobbink;K. Hicks;J. Galloway;T. Spranger

  • The effects of air‐borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi‐natural European vegetation

    Roland Bobbink;Michael Hornung;Jan G. M. Roelofs

  • Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition

    Cecilia Duprè;Carly J. Stevens;Carly J. Stevens;Traute Ranke;Albert Bleeker

  • Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States

    Linda H. Pardo;Mike E. Fenn;Christine L. Goodale;Linda. H. Geiser

  • Nitrogen deposition threatens species richness of grasslands across Europe

    Carly J. Stevens;Cecilia Duprè;Edu Dorland;Cassandre Gaudnik

  • Nitrous oxide emission and denitrification in chronically nitrate-loaded riparian buffer zones.

    Mariet M. Hefting;Roland Bobbink;Hannie de Caluwe

  • Working group report

    J. Strengbom;H.V. Andersen;K. Aazem;E.B. Adema

  • Natural nitrogen filter fails in polluted raised bogs

    Leon P. M. Lamers;Roland Bobbink;Jan G. M. Roelofs

  • Increasing dominance of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv in chalk grasslands: a threat to a species-rich ecosystem

    Unknown

  • How nitrate leaching from agricultural lands provokes phosphate eutrophication in groundwater fed wetlands: The sulphur bridge

    Alfons J. P. Smolders;Esther C. H. E. T. Lucassen;Roland Bobbink;Roland Bobbink;Jan G. M. Roelofs

  • Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial biodiversity

    Nancy B. Dise;Mike Ashmore;Salim Belyazid;Albert Bleeker

  • Decline of acid-sensitive plant species in heathland can be attributed to ammonium toxicity in combination with low pH.

    Leon J. L. Van Den Berg;Edu Dorland;Philippine Vergeer;Miron A. C. Hart

  • Nitrogen critical loads for natural and semi-natural ecosystems: The empirical approach

    Roland Bobbink;Jan G. M. Roelofs

  • Differential effects of ammonium and nitrate on three heathland species.

    Maaike C. C. de Graaf;Roland Bobbink;Jan G. M. Roelofs;Peter J. M. Verbeek

  • Atmospheric deposition and canopy exchange processes in heathland ecosystems

    Roland Bobbink;Gerrit W. Heil;Marc B.A.G. Raessen

  • Soil phosphorus constrains biodiversity across European grasslands

    Tobias Ceulemans;Carly J. Stevens;Luc Duchateau;Hans Jacquemyn

  • Nitrogen effects on plant species richness in herbaceous communities are more widespread and stronger than those of phosphorus

    Merel B. Soons;Mariet M. Hefting;Edu Dorland;Leon P.M. Lamers

  • A comparative study on nutrient cycling in wet heathland ecosystems : II. Litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization.

    Frank Berendse;Roland Bobbink;Gerrit Rouwenhorst

  • Restoration management of abandoned chalk grassland in the Netherlands

    Roland Bobbink;J. H. Willems

  • Wetlands: Functioning, biodiversity conservation, and restoration

    Roland Bobbink;Boudewijn Beltman;Jos T. A. Verhoeven;Dennis F. Whigham

  • Use of dynamic soil-vegetation models to assess impacts of nitrogen deposition on plant species composition: an overview

    W. de Vries;G. W. W. Wamelink;H. van Dobben;J. Kros

  • Wetlands and Natural Resource Management

    Jos T. A. Verhoeven;Boudewijn Beltman;Roland Bobbink;Dennis F. Whigham

  • Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial biodiversity - Chapter 20

    N.B. Dise;M. Ashmore;S. Belyazid;A. Bleeker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan G. M. Roelofs
Jan G. M. Roelofs Radboud University
Carly J. Stevens
Carly J. Stevens Lancaster University
Nancy B. Dise
Nancy B. Dise Manchester Metropolitan University
Albert Bleeker
Albert Bleeker Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands
Didier Alard
Didier Alard University of Bordeaux
Jos T. A. Verhoeven
Jos T. A. Verhoeven Utrecht University
Martin Diekmann
Martin Diekmann University of Bremen
David J. G. Gowing
David J. G. Gowing The Open University
Vigdis Vandvik
Vigdis Vandvik University of Bergen
Mariet M. Hefting
Mariet M. Hefting Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in combining their passion for ecology and evolution with healthcare, numerous online nursing programs offer flexible pathways to rewarding careers. Understanding how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner can help prospective students map out their education efficiently.

Options like an rn to bsn in 6 months program allow registered nurses to quickly advance, while rn to np bridge programs offer streamlined routes for those who want to become nurse practitioners. These bridge programs make it possible to blend science backgrounds with advanced clinical training.

Additionally, for individuals with a non-nursing bachelor's degree—such as those who studied ecology or evolution—there are now direct entry msn online pathways. These programs waive many traditional prerequisites, making it easier and faster to transition into the nursing profession and combine scientific knowledge from various fields.

Best Scientists Citing Roland Bobbink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles