World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6831 6631 3004 2889 213 8998

Misha Pavel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Misha Pavel between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Misha Pavel published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2008. 17 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2008. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
1978 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Misha Pavel: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 1
1980 1
1981 4
1982 2
1983 3
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 7
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 5
2002 4
2003 7
2004 7
2005 10
2006 11
2007 10
2008 18
2009 12
2010 14
2011 14
2012 9
2013 12
2014 11
2015 14
2016 7
2017 7
2018 4
2019 5
2020 2
2021 5
2022 6
2023 8
2024 9
2025 8
Total 273
Download as CSV

Misha Pavel publications per year - data summary

  • Misha Pavel, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, has 273 publications recorded across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1979, 1980, 1984, 1989 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 48 years in the span carries no publications at all (1995).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.8 per year counting only the 47 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 36 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1993: 34 publications (2.1 per year); 1994-2009: 104 publications (6.5 per year); 2010-2025: 135 publications (8.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Misha Pavel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Misha Pavel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490 213
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Misha Pavel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Misha Pavel, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, records 213 publications - the 51st percentile of the discipline.
  • 51% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Misha Pavel, and about 49% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Misha Pavel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Misha Pavel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Misha Pavel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Misha Pavel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Misha Pavel, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, records 46 D-Index - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Misha Pavel, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Misha Pavel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Misha Pavel is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and technology, especially as it relates to health and behavioral interventions. Pavel's work spans several main fields of study including Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and venues. These include:

  • "Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions" (2023), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Advancing Behavioral Intervention and Theory Development for Mobile Health: The HeartSteps II Protocol" (2022), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Blinding efficacy and adverse events following repeated transcranial alternating current, direct current, and random noise stimulation" (2022), published in Cortex
  • "Technology Acceptance Among Low-Income Asian American Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis" (2024), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Exploiting telerobotics for sensorimotor rehabilitation: a locomotor embodiment" (2021), published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Their work frequently appears in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society Annual International Conference, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Frequent collaborators include Daniel E. Rivera, Holly Jimison, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Benjamin M. Marlin, and Steven De La Torre, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

This profile reflects a body of work bridging psychology and technology, addressing behavioral and mental health challenges through innovative technological approaches and interventions. The scientist's contributions encompass experimental research, clinical applications, and theoretical development across multiple interdisciplinary domains.

Best Publications

  • Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth evidence workshop

    Santosh Kumar;Wendy J. Nilsen;Amy Abernethy;Audie Atienza

  • The psychophysics of visual search.

    John Palmer;Preeti Verghese;Misha Pavel

  • Adjustment Learning and Relevant Component Analysis

    Noam Shental;Tomer Hertz;Daphna Weinshall;Misha Pavel

  • A Typology for Visualizing Uncertainty

    Judi R. Thomson;Elizabeth G. Hetzler;Alan MacEachren;Mark N. Gahegan

  • Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research

    S. Kumar;W. Nilsen;M. Pavel;M. Srivastava

  • Advancing the Science of mHealth

    Wendy Nilsen;Santosh Kumar;Albert Shar;Carrie Varoquiers

  • Towards ASR on partially corrupted speech

    H. Hennansky;S. Tibrewala;M. Pavel

  • Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment

    Tamara L. Hayes;Francena Abendroth;Andre Adami;Misha Pavel

  • The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions

    Eileen Kowler;Albert J. Martins;M. Pavel

  • Unobtrusive and Ubiquitous In-Home Monitoring: A Methodology for Continuous Assessment of Gait Velocity in Elders

    S. Hagler;D. Austin;T.L. Hayes;J. Kaye

  • Advancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions

    Eric B. Hekler;Susan Michie;Misha Pavel;Daniel E. Rivera

  • Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research.

    Donna Spruijt-Metz;Eric Hekler;Niilo Saranummi;Stephen Intille

  • Designing and Evaluating mHealth Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review

    Elizabeth Stowell;Mercedes C. Lyson;Herman Saksono;Reneé C. Wurth

  • On the relative importance of various components of the modulation spectrum for automatic speech recognition

    Noboru Kanedera;Takayuki Arai;Hynek Hermansky;Hynek Hermansky;Misha Pavel;Misha Pavel

  • Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path

    Christian Araujo;Eileen Kowler;Misha Pavel

  • Unobtrusive monitoring of computer interactions to detect cognitive status in elders

    H. Jimison;M. Pavel;J. McKanna;J. Pavel

  • On the importance of various modulation frequencies for speech recognition.

    Noboru Kanedera;Takayuki Arai;Hynek Hermansky;Misha Pavel

  • Intelligibility of speech with filtered time trajectories of spectral envelopes

    T. Arai;M. Pavel;H. Hermansky;C. Avendano

  • Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Exercise Coaching System for Older Adults: Lessons Learned

    Ferda Ofli;Gregorij Kurillo;Stepan Obdrzalek;Ruzena Bajcsy

  • Detection of Movement in Bed Using Unobtrusive Load Cell Sensors

    A.M. Adami;M. Pavel;T.L. Hayes;C.M. Singer

  • Window-based computer dialogues

    S. K. Card;M. Pavel;J. E. Farrell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Kaye
Jeffrey Kaye Oregon Health & Science University
Deniz Erdogmus
Deniz Erdogmus Northeastern University
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University
Donna Spruijt-Metz
Donna Spruijt-Metz University of Southern California
Michael S. Landy
Michael S. Landy New York University
George Sperling
George Sperling University of California, Irvine
Albert J. Ahumada
Albert J. Ahumada Ames Research Center
Eric B. Hekler
Eric B. Hekler University of California, San Diego
Daphna Weinshall
Daphna Weinshall Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Daniel E. Rivera
Daniel E. Rivera Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary options to Computer Science can greatly expand your career opportunities. For those interested in analytics, pursuing an affordable data science degree online is a smart way to gain hands-on experience with big data and machine learning while minimizing student debt.

Technology enthusiasts may also want to consider accredited online electrical engineering programs. These programs offer flexible pathways to fields like electronics, robotics, and renewable energy, often with the added benefit of ABET accreditation for higher job placement potential.

If you’re looking for alternatives that take less time, there are many certifications for jobs in IT, cybersecurity, and network administration. Many of these provide quick entry into well-paying roles and enhance your resume in a competitive job market.

Finally, for those aiming to fast-track their education, exploring the shortest online masters degree options can accelerate career growth without long-term commitment. These accelerated online degrees deliver advanced skills and credentials in less time, making them ideal for career-focused learners.

Best Scientists Citing Misha Pavel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles