World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
8998
World Ranking
6831
National Ranking
3004

Misha Pavel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Misha Pavel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Misha Pavel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Misha Pavel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Misha Pavel is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and technology, especially as it relates to health and behavioral interventions. Pavel's work spans several main fields of study including Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Biomedical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and venues. These include:

  • "Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions" (2023), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Advancing Behavioral Intervention and Theory Development for Mobile Health: The HeartSteps II Protocol" (2022), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Blinding efficacy and adverse events following repeated transcranial alternating current, direct current, and random noise stimulation" (2022), published in Cortex
  • "Technology Acceptance Among Low-Income Asian American Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis" (2024), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Exploiting telerobotics for sensorimotor rehabilitation: a locomotor embodiment" (2021), published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Their work frequently appears in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society Annual International Conference, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Frequent collaborators include Daniel E. Rivera, Holly Jimison, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Benjamin M. Marlin, and Steven De La Torre, with multiple joint publications reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

This profile reflects a body of work bridging psychology and technology, addressing behavioral and mental health challenges through innovative technological approaches and interventions. The scientist's contributions encompass experimental research, clinical applications, and theoretical development across multiple interdisciplinary domains.

Best Publications

  • Mobile health technology evaluation: The mHealth evidence workshop

    Santosh Kumar;Wendy J. Nilsen;Amy Abernethy;Audie Atienza

  • The psychophysics of visual search.

    John Palmer;Preeti Verghese;Misha Pavel

  • Adjustment Learning and Relevant Component Analysis

    Noam Shental;Tomer Hertz;Daphna Weinshall;Misha Pavel

  • A Typology for Visualizing Uncertainty

    Judi R. Thomson;Elizabeth G. Hetzler;Alan MacEachren;Mark N. Gahegan

  • Mobile Health: Revolutionizing Healthcare Through Transdisciplinary Research

    S. Kumar;W. Nilsen;M. Pavel;M. Srivastava

  • Advancing the Science of mHealth

    Wendy Nilsen;Santosh Kumar;Albert Shar;Carrie Varoquiers

  • Towards ASR on partially corrupted speech

    H. Hennansky;S. Tibrewala;M. Pavel

  • Unobtrusive assessment of activity patterns associated with mild cognitive impairment

    Tamara L. Hayes;Francena Abendroth;Andre Adami;Misha Pavel

  • The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions

    Eileen Kowler;Albert J. Martins;M. Pavel

  • Unobtrusive and Ubiquitous In-Home Monitoring: A Methodology for Continuous Assessment of Gait Velocity in Elders

    S. Hagler;D. Austin;T.L. Hayes;J. Kaye

  • Advancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions

    Eric B. Hekler;Susan Michie;Misha Pavel;Daniel E. Rivera

  • Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research.

    Donna Spruijt-Metz;Eric Hekler;Niilo Saranummi;Stephen Intille

  • Designing and Evaluating mHealth Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review

    Elizabeth Stowell;Mercedes C. Lyson;Herman Saksono;Reneé C. Wurth

  • On the relative importance of various components of the modulation spectrum for automatic speech recognition

    Noboru Kanedera;Takayuki Arai;Hynek Hermansky;Hynek Hermansky;Misha Pavel;Misha Pavel

  • Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path

    Christian Araujo;Eileen Kowler;Misha Pavel

  • Unobtrusive monitoring of computer interactions to detect cognitive status in elders

    H. Jimison;M. Pavel;J. McKanna;J. Pavel

  • On the importance of various modulation frequencies for speech recognition.

    Noboru Kanedera;Takayuki Arai;Hynek Hermansky;Misha Pavel

  • Intelligibility of speech with filtered time trajectories of spectral envelopes

    T. Arai;M. Pavel;H. Hermansky;C. Avendano

  • Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Exercise Coaching System for Older Adults: Lessons Learned

    Ferda Ofli;Gregorij Kurillo;Stepan Obdrzalek;Ruzena Bajcsy

  • Detection of Movement in Bed Using Unobtrusive Load Cell Sensors

    A.M. Adami;M. Pavel;T.L. Hayes;C.M. Singer

  • Window-based computer dialogues

    S. K. Card;M. Pavel;J. E. Farrell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Kaye
Jeffrey Kaye Oregon Health & Science University
Deniz Erdogmus
Deniz Erdogmus Northeastern University
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University
Donna Spruijt-Metz
Donna Spruijt-Metz University of Southern California
Michael S. Landy
Michael S. Landy New York University
George Sperling
George Sperling University of California, Irvine
Albert J. Ahumada
Albert J. Ahumada Ames Research Center
Eric B. Hekler
Eric B. Hekler University of California, San Diego
Daphna Weinshall
Daphna Weinshall Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Daniel E. Rivera
Daniel E. Rivera Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary options to Computer Science can greatly expand your career opportunities. For those interested in analytics, pursuing an affordable data science degree online is a smart way to gain hands-on experience with big data and machine learning while minimizing student debt.

Technology enthusiasts may also want to consider accredited online electrical engineering programs. These programs offer flexible pathways to fields like electronics, robotics, and renewable energy, often with the added benefit of ABET accreditation for higher job placement potential.

If you’re looking for alternatives that take less time, there are many certifications for jobs in IT, cybersecurity, and network administration. Many of these provide quick entry into well-paying roles and enhance your resume in a competitive job market.

Finally, for those aiming to fast-track their education, exploring the shortest online masters degree options can accelerate career growth without long-term commitment. These accelerated online degrees deliver advanced skills and credentials in less time, making them ideal for career-focused learners.

Best Scientists Citing Misha Pavel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles