World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Albert J. Ahumada publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert J. Ahumada sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Albert J. Ahumada D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert J. Ahumada sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert J. Ahumada is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their work is positioned within a scientific and research institution known for contributions to aeronautics and space exploration technologies.

Although specific papers authored by Albert J. Ahumada are not listed, their association with an institution like Ames Research Center suggests involvement in fields related to aerospace, engineering, or physical sciences typically supported by this center.

No detailed information is provided regarding co-authors, which implies a lack of publicly available data on collaborative research or a focus on solitary work within their career documentation.

The absence of publication venues and book publications means there is limited public record on where or how extensively Albert J. Ahumada disseminates research findings, or on contributions to academic books.

No explicit data exists on the main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics of work, limiting the ability to detail specialized research interests or expertise areas.

There is also no record of awards won by Albert J. Ahumada, indicating either that no formal recognitions are documented or not included in the source data provided.

Albert J. Ahumada is noted as living, therefore the overview is written in present tense, reflecting ongoing potential contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.

    Andrew B. Watson;Albert J. Ahumada

  • Improved detection model for DCT coefficient quantization

    Heidi A. Peterson;Albert J. Ahumada;Andrew B. Watson

  • Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise

    Miguel P. Eckstein;Albert J. Ahumada;Andrew B. Watson

  • Technique to extract relevant image features for visual tasks

    Bettina L. Beard;Albert J. Ahumada

  • Visibility of DCT basis functions: effects of contrast masking

    J.A. Solomon;A.B. Watson;A. Ahumada

  • Putting the visual system noise back in the picture

    Albert J. Ahumada

  • Sensor fusion for synthetic vision

    M. Pavel;J. Larimer;A. Ahumada

  • Enhanced/Synthetic Vision Systems: Human Factors Research and Implications for Future Systems

    David C. Foyle;Albert J. Ahumada;James Larimer;Barbara Townsend Sweet

  • Towards a spatio-chromatic standard observer for detection

    Sophie M. Wuerger;Andrew B. Watson;Albert J. Ahumada

  • Learning by assertion: Two methods for calibrating a linear visual system

    Laurence T. Maloney;Albert J. Ahumada

  • A visual detection model for DCT coefficient quantization

    Albert J. Ahumada;Heidi A. Peterson

  • Nonlinear features in vernier acuity

    Erhardt Barth;Bettina L. Beard;Albert J. Ahumada

  • Image discrimination models predict signal detection in natural medical image backgrounds

    Miguel P. Eckstein;Albert J. Ahumada;Andrew B. Watson

  • Discrete cosine transform (DCT) basis function visibility: effects of viewing distance and contrast masking

    Andrew B. Watson;Joshua A. Solomon;Albert J. Ahumada;Alan Gale

  • Color matrix display simulation based on luminance and chromatic contrast sensitivity of early vision

    Russel A. Martin;Albert J. Ahumada;James O. Larimer

  • Models of human image discrimination predict object detection in natural backgrounds

    Albert J. Ahumada;Andrew B. Watson;Ann Marie Rohaly

  • 64.3: Flicker Visibility: A Perceptual Metric for Display Flicker

    Andrew B. Watson;Albert J. Ahumada

  • Engineering a visual system for seeing through fog

    J. Larimer;M. Pavel;A. Ahumada;B. Sweet

  • The Visibility of DCT Quantization Noise: Spatial Frequency Summation

    H. A. Peterson;A. J. Ahumada;A. B. Watson;Irving C. Statler

  • Using Vision Modeling to Define Occupational Vision Standards

    Bettina L. Beard;Talissa A. Frank;Albert J. Ahumada

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurence T. Maloney
Laurence T. Maloney New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology students in the USA often find it beneficial to diversify their skill sets with knowledge of related fields. Expanding your expertise through online education can open doors to additional career pathways in business, law, and finance.

For those interested in the financial aspects of technology ventures, exploring online finance degree programs can help you understand investment, budgeting, and resource management—key skills for tech leaders. Alternatively, a managerial focus can be quickly gained through a 6 month MBA program, perfect for engineers seeking leadership positions without a long academic commitment.

If you are interested in the legal aspects of technology, such as intellectual property or compliance, online paralegal programs offer convenient entry points into legal studies. For those wanting a solid understanding of financial record-keeping crucial for startups or consulting, you might consider bookkeeping courses.

By complementing your engineering or technology degree with targeted online programs, you can broaden your professional horizons and increase your impact in today’s interdisciplinary job market.

Best Scientists Citing Albert J. Ahumada

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles