World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
27897
World Ranking
1696
National Ranking
21

Vincent Yzerbyt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Yzerbyt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 305 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Vincent Yzerbyt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Yzerbyt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vincent Yzerbyt is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research spans multiple areas within social sciences and psychology, with a notable emphasis on social psychology, sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, and applied psychology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Their subfields of study are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Primary research topics covered in Vincent Yzerbyt's work include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Vincent Yzerbyt has authored numerous papers, with recent notable publications including:

  • "Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups." (2020), Psychological Review
  • "Groups' warmth is a personal matter: Understanding consensus on stereotype dimensions reconciles adversarial models of social evaluation" (2020), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • "The relation between conspiracism, government trust, and COVID-19 vaccination intentions: The key role of motivation" (2022), Social Science & Medicine
  • "Psychological Distress among Students in Higher Education: One Year after the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries" (2020), European Journal of Social Psychology

Frequent publication venues for Vincent Yzerbyt include:

  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Psychologica Belgica
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Co-authorship has been a significant aspect of their work, with frequent collaborators being:

  • Olivier Klein
  • Mathias Schmitz
  • Pascaline Van Oost
  • Olivier Luminet
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste

Vincent Yzerbyt has also contributed to the literature with book publications, including the work published by Mardaga eBooks titled Les psychologies du genre in 2021.

Best Publications

  • When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated

    Dominique Muller;Charles M. Judd;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.

    Charles M. Judd;Laurie James-Hawkins;Vincent Yzerbyt;Yoshihisa Kashima

  • The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification

    José M. Marques;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Jacques-Philippe Leyens

  • Stereotypes and Social Cognition

    Jacques Philippe Leyens;Vincent Yzerbyt;Georges Schadron

  • Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines

    David Howell;Yves Bestgen;Vincent Yzerbyt;Marylène Rogier

  • I Belong, therefore, I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias

    Emanuele Castano;Vincent Yzerbyt;Maria-Paola Paladino;Simona Sacchi

  • Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception.

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Steve Rocher;Georges Schadron

  • Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design.

    Stephanie A. Goodwin;Alexandra Gubin;Susan Tufts Fiske;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • Stereotypes as explanations : the formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups

    Craig McGarty;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Russell Spears

  • The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations

    José M. Marques;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Muriel Dumont;Daniel Wigboldus;Ernestine Gordijn

  • The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Olivier Corneille;Claudia Estrada

  • Fundamental dimensions of social judgment

    Andrea E. Abele;Amy J. C. Cuddy;Charles M. Judd;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • Adjusting researchers' approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions

    Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Dominique Muller;Charles M. Judd

  • Social judgeability : the impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes

    Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Georges Schadron;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Stephan Rocher

  • New recommendations for testing indirect effects in mediational models: The need to report and test component paths.

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Dominique Muller;Cédric Batailler;Charles M. Judd

  • You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation

    Marco Brambilla;Simona Sacchi;Patrice Rusconi;Paolo Cherubini

  • Aware and (Dis)Liking: Item-Based Analyses Reveal That Valence Acquisition via Evaluative Conditioning Emerges Only When There Is Contingency Awareness.

    Gordy Pleyers;Olivier Corneille;Olivier Luminet;Vincent Yzerbyt

  • Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes.

    Serge Guimond;Nyla R. Branscombe;Sophie Brunot;Abraham P. Buunk

  • Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups.

    Andrea E. Abele;Naomi Ellemers;Susan T. Fiske;Alex Koch

  • Perceived group and personal discrimination: Differential effects on personal self-esteem.

    David Bourguignon;Eleonore Seron;Eleonore Seron;Vincent Yzerbyt;Ginette Herman

  • The psychology of group perception : perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Charles M. Judd;Olivier Corneille

  • Culture, gender, and the self: variations and impact of social comparison processes across cultures.

    Serge Guimond;N. Branscombe;S. Brunot;A. P. Buunk

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivier Corneille
Olivier Corneille Université Catholique de Louvain
Jacques-Philippe Leyens
Jacques-Philippe Leyens Université Catholique de Louvain
Emanuele Castano
Emanuele Castano University of Trento
Daniël H. J. Wigboldus
Daniël H. J. Wigboldus Radboud University
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Maria Paola Paladino
Maria Paola Paladino University of Trento
Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Craig McGarty
Craig McGarty Western Sydney University
Bernard Rimé
Bernard Rimé Université Catholique de Louvain
Luk Warlop
Luk Warlop BI Norwegian Business School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens up several specialized career avenues, especially in behavioral analysis. Many students choose to pursue a career as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specific certifications and graduate-level education. Programs accredited by the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) are designed to meet these BCBA requirements and can often be completed fully online.

It’s important to note that BCBA certification requirements in Port St. Lucie may differ from other regions, so candidates should always verify local guidelines. Prospective professionals interested in how to become a BCBA in Portland, Raleigh, or Reno will find slight variations in educational prerequisites and supervised fieldwork hours. For example, understanding the bcba certification requirements in Port St. Lucie or the process of how to become a bcba in Portland can help students plan their academic pathway.

Additionally, researching Raleigh bcba education requirements and the steps for becoming a bcba in Reno ensures you’re prepared for any state-specific considerations. Choosing the right online degree and understanding regional licensing processes are crucial steps toward a successful psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent Yzerbyt

Trending Scientists