World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacques-Philippe Leyens

Jacques-Philippe Leyens

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
15752
World Ranking
6038
National Ranking
80

Jacques-Philippe Leyens publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques-Philippe Leyens sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jacques-Philippe Leyens D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques-Philippe Leyens sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacques-Philippe Leyens was affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their academic contributions include the publication of at least one book through Mardaga eBooks.

Their book titled Sommes-nous tous racistes ? was published in 2020 and has received citations in the academic community. This work reflects a direct engagement with sociological or psychological themes related to racism.

While there are no recorded individual papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with their profile, the existing data indicates a focus on the topic addressed in their book publication.

No awards or honors have been documented in connection with their academic career. The scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Virginia S. Y. Kwan;Peter Glick

  • The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification

    José M. Marques;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Jacques-Philippe Leyens

  • The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Paola M. Paladino;Ramon Rodriguez-Torres;Jeroen Vaes

  • Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries.

    Jens Binder;Hanna Zagefka;Rupert Brown;Friedrich Funke

  • Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups

    Jacques‐Philippe Leyens;Armando Rodriguez‐Perez;Ramon Rodriguez‐Torres;Ruth Gaunt

  • Stereotypes and Social Cognition

    Jacques Philippe Leyens;Vincent Yzerbyt;Georges Schadron

  • Stereotype Threat Undermines Intellectual Performance by Triggering a Disruptive Mental Load

    Jean-Claude Croizet;Gérard Després;Marie-Eve Gauzins;Pascal Huguet

  • Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Stéphanie Demoulin;Jeroen Vaes;Ruth Gaunt

  • Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism - The 2002 Tajfel lecture

    Jacques‐Philippe Leyens;Brezo Cortes;Stéphanie Demoulin;Stéphanie Demoulin;John F. Dovidio

  • Dimensions of "uniquely" and "non-uniquely" human emotions.

    Stéphanie Demoulin;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Maria-Paola Paladino;Ramon Rodriguez-Torres

  • Stereotype Threat: Are Lower Status and History of Stigmatization Preconditions of Stereotype Threat?

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Michel Désert;Jean-Claude Croizet;Catherine Darcis

  • On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: the implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations.

    Jeroen Andre' Filip Vaes;M. P. Paladino;Luigi Alessandro Castelli;J. P. H. Leyens

  • Social judgeability : the impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes

    Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Georges Schadron;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Stephan Rocher

  • Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap

    Federica Durante;Susan T Fiske;Nicolas Kervyn;Amy J C Cuddy

  • Differential Association of Uniquely and Non Uniquely Human Emotions with the Ingroup and the Outgroup

    Maria-Paola Paladino;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Ramon Rodriguez;Armando Rodriguez

  • Stéréotypes et cognition sociale

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Vincent Yzerbyt;Georges Schadron

  • The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification

    Vincent Yzerbyt;Emanuele Castano;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Maria-Paola Paladino

  • Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Jacques Philippe Leyens

  • Infrahumanization or Familiarity? Attribution of Uniquely Human Emotions to the Self, the Ingroup, and the Outgroup

    Brezo P. Cortes;Stéphanie Demoulin;Ramon T. Rodriguez;Armando P. Rodriguez

  • From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms

    Cícero Roberto Pereira;Cícero Roberto Pereira;Jorge Vala;Jacques Philippe Leyens

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Jeroen Vaes
Jeroen Vaes University of Trento
Maria Paola Paladino
Maria Paola Paladino University of Trento
Olivier Corneille
Olivier Corneille Université Catholique de Louvain
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Amy J. C. Cuddy
Amy J. C. Cuddy Harvard University
Richard Y. Bourhis
Richard Y. Bourhis University of Quebec at Montreal
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón University of Granada
Ed Cairns
Ed Cairns University of Ulster

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up numerous online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students choose to pursue counseling or school counseling, given the growing need for mental health professionals in various states. Online degree programs offer flexibility and can sometimes accelerate your career journey compared to traditional in-person study.

If you are looking for Wisconsin fastest counseling programs, several online and hybrid curriculums can help you meet state licensure requirements quickly. For those considering relocation, the fastest way to become a counselor in Wyoming may differ, as Wyoming has unique educational and internship prerequisites.

Planning to work in schools? Researching how to become a school counselor in Alabama can provide insight into state-specific certification steps. Similarly, understanding Alaska school counselor education requirements is crucial for meeting local eligibility standards. As requirements and professional pathways vary by state, reviewing each state's guidelines is essential for those interested in online psychology degrees and counseling roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jacques-Philippe Leyens

Recently Published Articles