World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10689 10009 5582 5097 65 33105

Amy J. C. Cuddy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy J. C. Cuddy between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy J. C. Cuddy published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
2002 2025

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy J. C. Cuddy: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 4
2003 1
2004 6
2005 3
2006 1
2007 6
2008 5
2009 4
2010 4
2011 4
2012 5
2013 9
2014 5
2015 11
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 1
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Amy J. C. Cuddy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. C. Cuddy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 65
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy J. C. Cuddy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy J. C. Cuddy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Hellman Fellow
  • 2013 - Hellman Fellow
  • 2012 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Amy J. C. Cuddy is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of psychology and social sciences, with work spanning several subfields including general psychology, safety research, and gender studies.

Their recent publications include the paper titled The Future of Women in Psychological Science, published in 2020 in Perspectives on Psychological Science, and a subsequent version of the same paper published in 2025 by UNC Libraries. The 2020 publication has received significant citations, indicating engagement within the academic community.

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • June Gruber
  • Jane Mendle
  • Kristen A. Lindquist
  • Toni Schmader
  • Lee Anna Clark

The scientist has contributed multiple times to the following publication venues:

  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • UNC Libraries

Amy J. C. Cuddy's research addresses topics such as:

  • Academic and historical perspectives in psychology
  • Career development and diversity
  • Gender diversity and inequality

Throughout their career, Amy J. C. Cuddy has been recognized with the Hellman Fellow award on three occasions: in 2012, 2013, and 2014.

Best Publications

  • A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

    Susan Tufts Fiske;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Jun Xu

  • Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence

    Susan Tufts Fiske;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick

  • Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

    Amy J.C. Cuddy;Susan Tufts Fiske;Peter Glick

  • The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Peter Glick

  • Power Posing Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance

    Dana R. Carney;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Andy J. Yap

  • Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Virginia S. Y. Kwan;Peter Glick

  • When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Peter Glick

  • (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth

    Susan T. Fiske;Juan Xu;Amy C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Peter Glick;Peter Glick

  • This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype

    Amy J.C. Cuddy;Michael I. Norton;Susan Tufts Fiske

  • The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations

    Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Anna Beninger

  • Doddering, but Dear: Process, Content, and Function in Stereotyping of Older Persons

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske

  • Fundamental dimensions of social judgment

    Andrea E. Abele;Amy J. C. Cuddy;Charles M. Judd;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • Aid in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of Secondary Emotions and Intergroup Helping

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Mindi S. Rock;Michael I. Norton

  • Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model

    Peter A. Caprariello;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Susan Tufts Fiske

  • A Threat in the Computer: The Race Implicit Association Test as a Stereotype Threat Experience

    Cynthia M. Frantz;Amy J. C. Cuddy;Molly Burnett;Heidi Ray

  • Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Elizabeth Baily Wolf;Peter Glick;Susan Crotty

  • Leadership is associated with lower levels of stress

    Gary D. Sherman;Jooa J. Lee;Amy J. C. Cuddy;Jonathan Renshon

  • Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap

    Federica Durante;Susan T Fiske;Nicolas Kervyn;Amy J C Cuddy

  • Gendered Races Implications for Interracial Marriage, Leadership Selection, and Athletic Participation

    Adam D. Galinsky;Erika V. Hall;Amy J. C. Cuddy

  • When Being a Model Minority Is Good . . . and Bad: Realistic Threat Explains Negativity Toward Asian Americans

    William W. Maddux;Adam D. Galinsky;Amy J. C. Cuddy;Mark Polifroni

  • Why Ordinary People Torture Enemy Prisoners

    Susan Tufts Fiske;Lasana T. Harris;Amy J.C. Cuddy

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Peter Glick
Peter Glick Lawrence University
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón University of Granada
Jacques-Philippe Leyens
Jacques-Philippe Leyens Université Catholique de Louvain
Fiona Kate Barlow
Fiona Kate Barlow University of Queensland
Chris G. Sibley
Chris G. Sibley University of Auckland
Ed Cairns
Ed Cairns University of Ulster
Roberto González
Roberto González Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to many related online degrees and diverse career opportunities, especially within speech-language pathology (SLP). SLP professionals work with individuals to assess, diagnose, and treat communication and swallowing disorders, making the field both rewarding and in demand nationwide.

Each state maintains its own certification and licensing requirements for speech-language pathologists. For example, becoming a speech therapist in New York involves fulfilling specific education, clinical experience, and examination criteria. Similarly, those looking to practice in another region must understand the North Carolina slp certification requirements.

Aspiring professionals should also review the slp requirements in North Dakota and slp requirements in Ohio to compare pathways and ensure they are meeting state standards. Online degree programs in psychology often provide flexible routes to meet these criteria, making it easier for students to specialize and transition into fulfilling careers in SLP and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Amy J. C. Cuddy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles