World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
57920
World Ranking
3163
National Ranking
1792

Peter Glick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Glick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Glick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Glick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Glick is affiliated with Lawrence University in the United States and specializes in research within the social sciences, with a particular focus on sociology, political science, gender studies, and social psychology.

The scientist's work emphasizes several key topics, including:

  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Gender diversity and inequality
  • Cultural differences and values
  • Culture, economy, and development studies
  • Gender roles and identity studies
  • Communication in education and healthcare
  • Climate change communication and perception

Peter Glick's publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • "Does Culture Moderate Gender Stereotypes? Individualism Predicts Communal (but Not Agentic) Prescriptions for Men Across 62 Nations," 2024, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Trash talk about the other gender: Content of, reactions to, and willingness to confront stereotypical comments about men and women," 2022, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • "Social psychological research on gender, sexuality, and relationships: reflections on contemporary scientific and cultural challenges," 2023, Frontiers in Social Psychology
  • "The Reproducibility Movement in Psychology: Does Researcher Gender Affect How People Perceive Scientists With a Failed Replication?", 2022, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Working Fathers: Overworked and Under-Familied?", 2023, Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent coauthors in Peter Glick's work include:

  • Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka
  • Artur Sawicki
  • Göksu Celikkol
  • Jennifer K. Bosson
  • Colette van Laar

Publishing venues where Peter Glick has contributed include:

  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Frontiers in Social Psychology
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

Best Publications

  • A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

    Susan Tufts Fiske;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Jun Xu

  • The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

    Peter Glick;Susan Tufts Fiske

  • Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence

    Susan Tufts Fiske;Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick

  • Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

    Amy J.C. Cuddy;Susan Tufts Fiske;Peter Glick

  • An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.

    Peter Glick;Susan T. Fiske

  • The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Peter Glick

  • Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures

    Peter Glick;Susan T. Fiske;Antonio Mladinic;José L. Saiz

  • Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Virginia S. Y. Kwan;Peter Glick

  • Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women

    Peter Glick;Susan T. Fiske

  • When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice

    Amy J. C. Cuddy;Susan T. Fiske;Peter Glick

  • (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth

    Susan T. Fiske;Juan Xu;Amy C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Peter Glick;Peter Glick

  • Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview

    J F Dovidio;M Hewstone;P Glick;V M Esses

  • The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations

    Amy J.C. Cuddy;Peter Glick;Anna Beninger

  • The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations

    Laurie A. Rudman;Peter Glick

  • The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women

    Peter Glick;Jeffrey Diebold;Barbara Bailey-Werner;Lin Zhu

  • On the nature of prejudice : fifty years after Allport

    John F. Dovidio;Peter Samuel Glick;Laurie A. Rudman

  • Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos

    Francisca Expósito;Miguel C. Moya;Peter Glick

  • Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations

    Peter Glick;Maria Lameiras;Susan T Fiske;Thomas Eckes

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University
Amy J. C. Cuddy
Amy J. C. Cuddy Harvard University
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Dominic Abrams
Dominic Abrams University of Kent
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón University of Granada
Naomi Ellemers
Naomi Ellemers Utrecht University
Gerd Bohner
Gerd Bohner Bielefeld University
Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a wide variety of online degrees and specialized career pathways. Many students look for cost-effective routes to pursue advanced study or certification, making affordability a key consideration.

For those interested in the business and organizational side of psychology, a cheap masters degree in organizational psychology can help launch a career in talent management, human resources, or workplace consulting. If you are drawn to behavior analysis, there are affordable online bcba programs that lead to Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials, qualifying graduates to work in schools, clinics, or private practice.

Students seeking careers as counselors or therapists may consider the cheapest clinical psychology masters programs online for flexible and accessible training. For those aspiring to the highest academic qualifications, several affordable online doctoral programs in psychology are available for advanced research, teaching, or clinical leadership roles.

Today’s online psychology degrees make it easier than ever to balance studies with work or family, offering diverse opportunities at all levels while keeping education within financial reach.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Glick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles