World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexander I. Arkhipkin

Alexander I. Arkhipkin

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
6884
World Ranking
7401
National Ranking
2637

Alexander I. Arkhipkin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander I. Arkhipkin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Alexander I. Arkhipkin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander I. Arkhipkin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander I. Arkhipkin is affiliated with Old Dominion University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans a variety of subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Oceanography.

The main topics covered in their research focus around Marine and Fisheries Research, with particular attention to Cephalopods and Marine Biology. Other significant topics include Marine Animal Studies Overview, Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies, Coral and Marine Ecosystem Studies, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Arkhipkin include Paul Brickle, Graham J. Pierce, Andreas Winter, Brendon Lee, and Tobias Büring.

Their research has been published repeatedly in several prominent scientific venues. Key publication outlets are:

  • ICES Journal of Marine Science
  • Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
  • Fisheries Research
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
  • Marine Biology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Alexander I. Arkhipkin include:

  • Stock assessment and management of cephalopods: advances and challenges for short-lived fishery resources (2020, ICES Journal of Marine Science)
  • Are we ready to track climate-driven shifts in marine species across international boundaries? - A global survey of scientific bottom trawl data (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Ecological-Fishery Forecasting of Squid Stock Dynamics under Climate Variability and Change: Review, Challenges, and Recommendations (2021, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture)
  • Temperature effects on size, maturity, and abundance of the squid Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) on the Patagonian Shelf (2021, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science)
  • High seas fisheries: the Achilles' heel of major straddling squid resources (2022, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries)

Best Publications

  • A review of the biology of the jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae)

    Ch.M. Nigmatullin;K.N. Nesis;A.I. Arkhipkin

  • World squid fisheries

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Paul G K Rodhouse;Graham J. Pierce;Warwick Sauer

  • Global proliferation of cephalopods

    Zoë A. Doubleday;Thomas A.A. Prowse;Alexander Arkhipkin;Graham J. Pierce

  • Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries

    Paul G.K. Rodhouse;Graham J. Pierce;Owen C. Nichols;Warwick H.H. Sauer

  • Genetic structuring of Patagonian toothfish populations in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean: the effect of the Antarctic Polar Front and deep-water troughs as barriers to genetic exchange

    P. W. Shaw;A. I. Arkhipkin;H. Al-Khairulla

  • Statoliths as ‘black boxes’ (life recorders) in squid

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin

  • Age, growth, stock structure and migratory rate of pre-spawning short-finned squid Illex argentinus based on statolith ageing investigations

    Alexander Arkhipkin

  • Reproductive System Structure, Development and Function in Cephalopods with a New General Scale for Maturity Stages

    A I Arkhipkin

  • The influence of seasonal environmental changes on ontogenetic migrations of the squid Loligo gahi on the Falkland shelf

    A. I. Arkhipkin;R. Grzebielec;A. M. Sirota;A. V. Remeslo

  • Spatial and temporal variation in elemental signatures of statoliths from the Patagonian longfin squid (Loligo gahi)

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Steven E. Campana;Jennifer L. FitzGerald;Simon R. Thorrold

  • Age, growth and reproductive biology of diamond-shaped squid Thysanoteuthis rhombus (Oegopsida: Thysanoteuthidae)

    C. M. Nigmatullin;A. I. Arkhipkin;R. M. Sabirov

  • Diversity in growth and longevity in short-lived animals: squid of the suborder Oegopsina

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin

  • Advances in Cephalopod Science: Biology, Ecology, Cultivation and Fisheries

    Paul G.K. Rodhouse;Graham J. Pierce;Owen C. Nichols;Warwick H.H. Sauer

  • Growth and maturation in two successive seasonal groups of the short-finned squid, Illex coindetii from the Strait of Sicily (central Mediterranean)

    A. Arkhipkin;P. Jereb;S. Ragonese

  • Stock assessment and management of cephalopods: advances and challenges for short-lived fishery resources

    Alexander I Arkhipkin;Lisa C Hendrickson;Ignacio Payá;Graham J Pierce;Graham J Pierce

  • Seasonal and interannual variability in growth and maturation of winter-spawning Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) in the Southwest Atlantic

    Alexander Arkhipkin;Vladimir Laptikhovsky

  • Ontogenetic changes in morphometric and reproductive indices of the squid Gonatus fabricii (Oegopsida, Gonatidae) in the Norwegian Sea

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Herman Bjørke

  • Role of the statolith in functioning of the acceleration receptor system in squids and sepioids

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Vyacheslav A. Bizikov

  • Thirty years' progress in age determination of squid using statoliths

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Zhanna N. Shcherbich

  • Squid as nutrient vectors linking Southwest Atlantic marine ecosystems

    Unknown

  • Can the chemistry of otolith nuclei determine population structure of Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides

    J. R. Ashford;A. I. Arkhipkin;C. M. Jones

  • Age and growth of the squid Sthenoteuthis pteropus (Oegopsida: Ommastrephidae) from the Central-East Atlantic

    Alexander Arkhipkin;Alexander Mikheev

  • The spatio-temporal pattern of Argentine shortfin squid Illex argentinus abundance in the southwest Atlantic

    Mar Sacau;Graham J. Pierce;Jianjun Wang;Alexander I. Arkhipkin

  • Embryonic life of the loliginid squid Loligo vulgaris: comparison between statoliths of Atlantic and Mediterranean populations

    Roger Villanueva;A. Arkhipkin;Patrizia Jereb;E. Lefkaditou

  • DNA markers indicate that distinct spawning cohorts and aggregations of Patagonian squid, Loligo gahi , do not represent genetically discrete subpopulations

    P. W. Shaw;A. I. Arkhipkin;G. J. Adcock;G. J. Adcock;W. J. Burnett

  • Ecological-Fishery Forecasting of Squid Stock Dynamics under Climate Variability and Change: Review, Challenges, and Recommendations

    Hassan Moustahfid;Lisa C. Hendrickson;Alexander Arkhipkin;Graham J. Pierce

  • Ecology of the Oceanic Squid Onychoteuthis Banksi and The Relationship Between the Genera Onychoteuthis and Chaunoteuthis (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae)

    Alexander I. Arkhipkin;Chingiz M. Nigmatullin

  • Links between marine fauna and oceanic fronts on the Patagonian Shelf and Slope

    Alexander Arkhipkin;Paul Brickle;Vladimir Laptikhovsky

  • Otolith Chemistry Reflects Frontal Systems in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

    J. R. Ashford;A. I. Arkhipkin;C. M. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham J. Pierce
Graham J. Pierce Spanish National Research Council
Paul G. Rodhouse
Paul G. Rodhouse British Antarctic Survey
Paul W. Shaw
Paul W. Shaw Aberystwyth University
Gretta T. Pecl
Gretta T. Pecl University of Tasmania
João Santos Pereira
João Santos Pereira University of Lisbon
Ángel F. González
Ángel F. González Spanish National Research Council
Bronwyn M. Gillanders
Bronwyn M. Gillanders University of Adelaide
Ángel Guerra
Ángel Guerra Spanish National Research Council
Steven E. Campana
Steven E. Campana University of Iceland
Leonid V. Danyushevsky
Leonid V. Danyushevsky University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Many opt for affordable and flexible options like the cheapest online general studies degree programs, which provide a broad interdisciplinary foundation. These programs can complement specialized environmental knowledge with skills in communication, policy, and management.

Those seeking a quicker or less intensive route to a bachelor's degree might consider programs listed among the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get. Such degrees often focus on practical skills and require fewer technical prerequisites, making them ideal for career changers or working professionals.

For a deeper scientific focus closely related to Environmental Sciences, pursuing a geoscience online degree is an excellent option. These degrees emphasize earth processes and sustainable resource management, preparing graduates for roles in research, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Another valuable pathway is studying Geographic Information Systems through the best gis graduate programs. GIS skills are critical for spatial data analysis, environmental planning, and disaster management, making this a highly relevant and employable specialization within environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander I. Arkhipkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles