World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
4321
World Ranking
9525
National Ranking
4023

Carl Y. Saab publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl Y. Saab sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 59 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Carl Y. Saab D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carl Y. Saab sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carl Y. Saab is a researcher affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research topics cover various aspects of pain and brain function, including:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Migraine and Headache Studies

Carl Y. Saab has contributed to multiple high-impact papers, including the following recent examples:

  • Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: challenges and opportunities (2020), published in Nature Reviews Neurology
  • Pain phenotypes classified by machine learning using electroencephalography features (2020), published in NeuroImage
  • Time-dynamic pulse modulation of spinal cord stimulation reduces mechanical hypersensitivity and spontaneous pain in rats (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Automated and rapid self-report of nociception in transgenic mice (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • How quantum computing can enhance biomarker discovery (2025), published in Patterns

The venues frequently chosen for publication by this researcher include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SLEEP
  • Frontiers in Pain Research
  • Nature Reviews Neurology

Co-authorship relationships appear significant in their work, with frequent collaborators including:

  • Reena Mehra
  • David A. Borton
  • Samer Ghosn
  • Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi
  • Matheus Araújo

Best Publications

  • Upregulation of Sodium Channel Nav1.3 and Functional Involvement in Neuronal Hyperexcitability Associated with Central Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury

    Bryan C. Hains;Joshua P. Klein;Carl Y. Saab;Matthew J. Craner

  • Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: challenges and opportunities.

    Karen D. Davis;Karen D. Davis;Nima Aghaeepour;Andrew H. Ahn;Martin S. Angst

  • Altered sodium channel expression in second-order spinal sensory neurons contributes to pain after peripheral nerve injury.

    Bryan C. Hains;Carl Y. Saab;Joshua P. Klein;Matthew J. Craner

  • Changes in electrophysiological properties and sodium channel Nav1.3 expression in thalamic neurons after spinal cord injury

    Bryan C. Hains;Carl Y. Saab;Stephen G. Waxman

  • Phenytoin protects spinal cord axons and preserves axonal conduction and neurological function in a model of neuroinflammation in vivo.

    Albert C. Lo;Carl Y. Saab;Joel A. Black;Stephen G. Waxman

  • The cerebellum: organization, functions and its role in nociception.

    Carl Y. Saab;William D. Willis

  • Long-term protection of central axons with phenytoin in monophasic and chronic-relapsing EAE

    Joel A. Black;Shujun Liu;Bryan C. Hains;Carl Y. Saab

  • Alterations in Burst Firing of Thalamic VPL Neurons and Reversal by Nav1.3 Antisense After Spinal Cord Injury

    Bryan C. Hains;Carl Y. Saab;Stephen G. Waxman

  • Cortical theta is increased while thalamocortical coherence is decreased in rat models of acute and chronic pain.

    Brian W. LeBlanc;Theresa R. Lii;Andrew E. Silverman;Robert T. Alleyne

  • Preemptive intrathecal ketamine injection produces a long-lasting decrease in neuropathic pain behaviors in a rat model.

    Allen W. Burton;Doo H. Lee;Carl Saab;Jin M. Chung

  • Pain-related changes in the brain: diagnostic and therapeutic potentials

    Carl Y. Saab

  • Sodium channel blockade with phenytoin protects spinal cord axons, enhances axonal conduction, and improves functional motor recovery after contusion SCI.

    Bryan C. Hains;Carl Y. Saab;Albert C. Lo;Stephen G. Waxman

  • Neutrophils invade lumbar dorsal root ganglia after chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve.

    N. Morin;S.A. Owolabi;M.W. Harty;E.F. Papa

  • Fractalkine and minocycline alter neuronal activity in the spinal cord dorsal horn.

    Samuel A. Owolabi;Carl Y. Saab

  • Unilateral focal burn injury is followed by long-lasting bilateral allodynia and neuronal hyperexcitability in spinal cord dorsal horn.

    Yu-Wen Chang;Andrew Tan;Carl Saab;Stephen Waxman

  • High-frequency stimulation in the ventral posterolateral thalamus reverses electrophysiologic changes and hyperalgesia in a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain.

    Masashi Iwata;Brian W. LeBlanc;Laith M. Kadasi;Michele L. Zerah

  • Electroencephalographic signatures of pain and analgesia in rats.

    Brian W LeBlanc;Paul M Bowary;Paul M Bowary;Yu-Chieh Chao;Yu-Chieh Chao;Yu-Chieh Chao;Theresa R Lii;Theresa R Lii

  • T-type calcium channel blocker Z944 restores cortical synchrony and thalamocortical connectivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

    Brian W LeBlanc;Theresa R Lii;Jian Jia Huang;Yu-Chieh Chao

  • Minocycline injection in the ventral posterolateral thalamus reverses microglial reactivity and thermal hyperalgesia secondary to sciatic neuropathy.

    Brian W. LeBlanc;Michele L. Zerah;Laith M. Kadasi;Noori Chai

  • Microglia: a newly discovered role in visceral hypersensitivity?

    Carl Y. Saab;Jing Wang;Chunping Gu;Kirsten N. Garner

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Waxman
Stephen G. Waxman Yale University
Bryan C. Hains
Bryan C. Hains Yale University
Joel A. Black
Joel A. Black Yale University
Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj
Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj Yale University
William D. Willis
William D. Willis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Karen D. Davis
Karen D. Davis University Health Network
Nayef E. Saadé
Nayef E. Saadé American University of Beirut
Jin Mo Chung
Jin Mo Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Theodore R. Cummins
Theodore R. Cummins Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Jing Wang
Jing Wang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA can open diverse career opportunities in healthcare, counseling, social work, and research. Many students are now exploring online programs to help them gain credentials faster or at a lower cost. If you’re interested in social work, consider an accelerated msw program; these pathways provide an efficient route into meaningful community and healthcare roles.

For those drawn to psychology, pursuing an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online can be a flexible option. Such degrees are designed to deepen your understanding of human behavior and can serve as a strong foundation for neuroscience or mental health careers.

If your interests align with counseling, accredited options matter. Enrolling in one of the cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensures that your education meets professional standards—essential for licensure. Cost can also be a deciding factor; you can reduce financial barriers by targeting the cheapest online counseling degree programs available.

Each of these online degrees supports a wide range of neuroscience-related career pathways, letting you tailor your education and future to your specific goals.

Best Scientists Citing Carl Y. Saab

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles