World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
30577
World Ranking
1657
National Ranking
811

Jin Mo Chung publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jin Mo Chung sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 177 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jin Mo Chung D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jin Mo Chung sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jin Mo Chung is affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their research portfolio spans several aspects of medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on pain mechanisms, pain management, and related neurological processes.

Their work concentrates primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Subfields include Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, and Neurology.

Research topics covered extensively in their publications are:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Jin Mo Chung has published multiple papers in a range of scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • Low-intensity, Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Differently Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in the Rodent Superficial Dorsal Horn (2020, Neuroscience)
  • Circadian regulation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain and the underlying transcriptomic landscape (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Postinjury stimulation triggers a transition to nociplastic pain in mice (2021, Pain)
  • HIV-Related Neuropathy: Pathophysiology, Treatment and Challenges (2021, Journal of Neurology and Experimental Neuroscience)
  • Development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia depends on reactive astrocytes controlled by Wnt5a signaling (2022, Molecular Psychiatry)

Publication venues where Jin Mo Chung frequently contributes include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Pain
  • Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neurology and Experimental Neuroscience

Collaborations have been established with several co-authors across their career, notably including:

  • Jun-Ho La
  • Jigong Wang
  • Chilman Bae
  • Shao-Jun Tang
  • Kali Hankerd

Best Publications

  • Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw.

    S.R. Chaplan;Flemming Bach;J.W. Pogrel;J.M. Chung

  • An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat.

    Sun Ho Kim;Jin Mo Chung

  • Heritability of nociception I: responses of 11 inbred mouse strains on 12 measures of nociception.

    Jeffrey S. Mogil;Sonya G. Wilson;Karine Bon;Seo Eun Lee

  • Neurogenic hyperalgesia: central neural correlates in responses of spinothalamic tract neurons

    D. A. Simone;L. S. Sorkin;U. Oh;J. M. Chung

  • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in a rat model of neuropathic pain

    Hee Kee Kim;Soon Kwon Park;Jun Li Zhou;Giulio Taglialatela

  • Comparison of three rodent neuropathic pain models

    Kwang Jin Kim;Young Wook Yoon;Jin Mo Chung

  • Cutaneous sensory receptors in the rat foot

    Joong Woo Leem;W. D. Willis;Jin Mo Chung

  • The anti-allodynic effects of amitriptyline, gabapentin, and lidocaine in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

    Salahadin Abdi;Doo Hyun Lee;Jin Mo Chung

  • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in enhancement of NMDA-receptor phosphorylation in animal models of pain.

    Xiu Gao;Hee Kee Kim;Jin Mo Chung;Kyungsoon Chung

  • Signs of neuropathic pain depend on signals from injured nerve fibers in a rat model.

    Kwangsup Sheen;Jin Mo Chung

  • Heritability of nociception II. 'Types' of nociception revealed by genetic correlation analysis.

    Jeffrey S Mogil;Sonya G Wilson;Karine Bon;Seo Eun Lee

  • Reactive oxygen species contribute to neuropathic pain by reducing spinal GABA release

    June Yowtak;Kwan Yeop Lee;Kwan Yeop Lee;Hee Young Kim;Jigong Wang

  • Correlation of cell body size, axon size, and signal conduction velocity for individually labelled dorsal root ganglion cells in the cat.

    Kyu Ho Lee;Kyungsoon Chung;Jin Mo Chung;Richard E. Coggeshall

  • Contributions of injured and intact afferents to neuropathic pain in an experimental rat model

    Young Wook Yoon;Heung Sik Na;Jin Mo Chung

  • Sympathetic sprouting in the dorsal root ganglia of the injured peripheral nerve in a rat neuropathic pain model

    Kyungsoon Chung;Bae Hwan Lee;Young Wook Yoon;Jin Mo Chung

  • Factors influencing peripheral nerve stimulation produced inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract cells.

    J. M. Chung;K. H. Lee;Y. Hori;K. Endo

  • Effects of iontophoretically released amino acids and amines on primate spinothalamic tract cells.

    WS Willcockson;JM Chung;Y Hori;KH Lee

  • The changes in expression of three subtypes of TTX sensitive sodium channels in sensory neurons after spinal nerve ligation.

    Chang Hoon Kim;Youngsuk Oh;Jin Mo Chung;Kyungsoon Chung

  • The role of reactive oxygen species in capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia and in the activities of dorsal horn neurons

    Inhyung Lee;Hee Kee Kim;Jae Hyo Kim;Kyungsoon Chung

  • Oxidative stress in the spinal cord is an important contributor in capsaicin-induced mechanical secondary hyperalgesia in mice

    Erica S. Schwartz;Inhyung Lee;Kyungsoon Chung;Jin Mo Chung

  • Abnormalities of sympathetic innervation in the area of an injured peripheral nerve in a rat model of neuropathic pain

    Kyungsoon Chung;Hee Jin Kim;Heung Sik Na;Mae Ja Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Kyungsoon Chung
Kyungsoon Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
William D. Willis
William D. Willis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Richard E. Coggeshall
Richard E. Coggeshall The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Heung Sik Na
Heung Sik Na Korea University
Susan M. Carlton
Susan M. Carlton The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Marshall Devor
Marshall Devor Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jeffrey S. Mogil
Jeffrey S. Mogil McGill University
Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
John K. Belknap
John K. Belknap Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jin Mo Chung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles