World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
14900
World Ranking
1965
National Ranking
941

Susan M. Carlton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 182 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Susan M. Carlton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan M. Carlton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan M. Carlton is affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a commitment to research within this institution.

The available data does not list specific research fields, subfields, or main topics of study associated with Susan M. Carlton. Additionally, there is no record of recent papers, co-authors, frequent publication venues, or book publications linked to this researcher in the accessible sources.

No awards or honors have been recorded in connection with Susan M. Carlton. The scientist is currently living, and their professional standing remains active without indications of retirement or cessation of research activities.

Although detailed information about their research contributions, thematic focus, and collaboration networks is not provided, the association with a major academic and medical research institution such as The University of Texas Medical Branch suggests involvement in scientific and medical scholarship or related fields.

Best Publications

  • Staining of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in lumbar spinal cord increases following a sciatic nerve constriction injury.

    Chris Garrison;P. M. Dougherty;K. C. Kajander;S. M. Carlton

  • Localization and activation of glutamate receptors in unmyelinated axons of rat glabrous skin.

    Susan M. Carlton;Gregory L. Hargett;Richard E. Coggeshall

  • Mechanisms of chronic central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

    Claire E. Hulsebosch;Bryan C. Hains;Eric D. Crown;Susan M. Carlton

  • Peripheral group I metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate nociception in mice

    G. Bhave;F. Karim;S. M. Carlton;R. W. Gereau

  • Receptor localization in the mammalian dorsal horn and primary afferent neurons

    Richard E. Coggeshall;Susan M. Carlton

  • Ultrastructural analysis of NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors on unmyelinated and myelinated axons in the periphery.

    Richard E. Coggeshall;Susan M. Carlton

  • The effects of dorsal rhizotomy and spinal cord isolation on calcitonin gene-related peptide-labeled terminals in the rat lumbar dorsal horn

    K. Chung;W.T. Lee;S.M. Carlton

  • Peripheral administration of NMDA, AMPA or KA results in pain behaviors in rats

    Shengtai Zhou;Lara Bonasera;Susan M. Carlton

  • Opioid receptors on peripheral sensory axons.

    Richard E Coggeshall;Shengtai Zhou;Susan M Carlton

  • Inflammation-induced changes in peripheral glutamate receptor populations.

    S.M Carlton;R.E Coggeshall

  • Peripheral NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors contribute to nociceptive behaviors in the rat formalin test.

    Elyad M. Davidson;Richard E. Coggeshall;Susan M. Carlton

  • Responses of spinothalamic tract cells to mechanical and thermal stimulation of skin in rats with experimental peripheral neuropathy.

    J. Palecek;V. Paleckova;Patrick M Dougherty;S. M. Carlton

  • Peripheral and central sensitization in remote spinal cord regions contribute to central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury

    Susan M. Carlton;Junhui Du;Huai Yu Tan;Olivera Nesic

  • Peripheral glutamate release in the hindpaw following low and high intensity sciatic stimulation.

    John DeGroot;Shengtai Zhou;Susan M. Carlton

  • Peripheral excitatory amino acids.

    Susan M Carlton

  • Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 is essential for cisplatin-induced heat hyperalgesia in mice

    Lauren E Ta;Allan J Bieber;Susan M Carlton;Charles L Loprinzi

  • Peripheral capsaicin receptors increase in the inflamed rat hindpaw: a possible mechanism for peripheral sensitization

    Susan M Carlton;Richard E Coggeshall

  • Neuroma formation and numbers of axons in a rat model of experimental peripheral neuropathy.

    Susan M. Carlton;Patrick M. Dougherty;Carolyn M. Pover;Richard E. Coggeshall

  • Evidence for the interaction of glutamate and NK1 receptors in the periphery.

    Susan M. Carlton;Shengtai Zhou;Richard E. Coggeshall

  • Chronic Spontaneous Activity Generated in the Somata of Primary Nociceptors Is Associated with Pain-Related Behavior after Spinal Cord Injury

    Supinder S. Bedi;Qing Yang;Robyn J. Crook;Junhui Du

  • Is large myelinated fiber loss associated with hyperalgesia in a model of experimental peripheral neuropathy in the rat

    Richard E. Coggeshall;Patrick M. Dougherty;Carolyn M. Pover;Susan M. Carlton

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Coggeshall
Richard E. Coggeshall The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
William D. Willis
William D. Willis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Patrick M. Dougherty
Patrick M. Dougherty The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Karin N. Westlund
Karin N. Westlund University of New Mexico
Kyungsoon Chung
Kyungsoon Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Claire E. Hulsebosch
Claire E. Hulsebosch The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jin Mo Chung
Jin Mo Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Edgar T. Walters
Edgar T. Walters The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Qing Lin
Qing Lin The University of Texas at Arlington
Martin Koltzenburg
Martin Koltzenburg University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Susan M. Carlton

Trending Scientists