World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4965
World Ranking
8834
National Ranking
3737

Qing Lin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qing Lin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Qing Lin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qing Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Qing Lin is affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Oceanography, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their research topics prominently include:

  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
  • Neuroscience of Respiration and Sleep
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Qing Lin has published in various scientific venues contributing to peer-reviewed journals such as:

  • World Journal of Clinical Cases
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • The Anatomical Record
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  • Neuroscience Letters

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Light attenuation parameterization in a highly turbid mega estuary and its impact on the coastal planktonic ecosystem," 2024, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • "Multi-region local field potential signatures and brain coherence alternations in response to nitroglycerin-induced migraine attacks," 2023, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  • "The Relation between the Dynamization of Hexapod Circular External Fixator and Tibial Mechanical Properties," 2023, Orthopaedic Surgery
  • "Contributions of aversive environmental stress to migraine chronification: Research update of migraine pathophysiology," 2021, World Journal of Clinical Cases
  • "Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor expressions in the trigeminal root entry zone and trigeminal ganglion neurons of a trigeminal neuralgia rat model," 2020, The Anatomical Record

Qing Lin has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Zhen Wang, Ruirui Wang, Tanghua Liu, Fang Xie, and Yanqing Liu. These collaborations reflect a multi-disciplinary approach, supporting studies across neurology, neuroscience, and clinical applications.

Best Publications

  • Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Contributes to Spinal Cord Central Sensitization

    Li Fang;Jing Wu;Qing Lin;William D. Willis

  • Peripheral and central sensitization in remote spinal cord regions contribute to central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury

    Susan M. Carlton;Junhui Du;Huai Yu Tan;Olivera Nesic

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor activation produces PKA- and PKC-dependent mechanical hyperalgesia and central sensitization.

    Rui Qing Sun;Yi Jun Tu;Nada B. Lawand;Jing Yin Yan

  • Dorsal Root Reflexes and Cutaneous Neurogenic Inflammation After Intradermal Injection of Capsaicin in Rats

    Qing Lin;Jing Wu;William D. Willis

  • Enhanced Phosphorylation of NMDA Receptor 1 Subunits in Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn and Spinothalamic Tract Neurons after Intradermal Injection of Capsaicin in Rats

    Xiaoju Zou;Qing Lin;William D. Willis

  • Nitric oxide synthase in spinal cord central sensitization following intradermal injection of capsaicin

    J. Wu;L. Fang;Q. Lin;W. D. Willis

  • Role of protein kinase A in phosphorylation of NMDA receptor 1 subunits in dorsal horn and spinothalamic tract neurons after intradermal injection of capsaicin in rats.

    X Zou;Q Lin;W.D Willis

  • Aδ and C Primary Afferents Convey Dorsal Root Reflexes After Intradermal Injection of Capsaicin in Rats

    Qing Lin;Xiaoju Zou;William D. Willis

  • Possible Role of Protein Kinase C in the Sensitization of Primate Spinothalamic Tract Neurons

    Qing Lin;Yuan Bo Peng;William D. Willis

  • Nitric oxide contributes to central sensitization following intradermal injection of capsaicin.

    Jing Wu;Qing Lin;David J. McAdoo;William D. Willis

  • Inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract neurons by spinal glycine and GABA is reduced during central sensitization

    Qing Lin;Yuan Bo Peng;William D. Willis

  • The role of 5-HT3 receptors in periaqueductal gray-induced inhibition of nociceptive dorsal horn neurons in rats.

    Yuan B. Peng;Qing Lin;William D. Willis

  • Glycine and GABAA antagonists reduce the inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract neurons produced by stimulation in periaqueductal gray.

    Qing Lin;Yuanbo Peng;William D. Willis

  • Nitric Oxide Mediates the Central Sensitization of Primate Spinothalamic Tract Neurons

    Qing Lin;Jiri Palec̆ek;Jiri Palec̆ek;Veronika Palec̆ková;Veronika Palec̆ková;Yuan Bo Peng

  • Involvement of cGMP in nociceptive processing by and sensitization of spinothalamic neurons in primates.

    Qing Lin;Yuan Bo Peng;Jing Wu;William D. Willis

  • Changes in nitric oxide synthase isoforms in the spinal cord of rat following induction of chronic arthritis.

    J. Wu;Q. Lin;Y. Lu;W. D. Willis

  • Roles of TRPV1 and neuropeptidergic receptors in dorsal root reflex-mediated neurogenic inflammation induced by intradermal injection of capsaicin.

    Qing Lin;Dingge Li;Xijin Xu;Xiaoju Zou;Xiaoju Zou

  • Sensitization of primary afferent nociceptors induced by intradermal capsaicin involves the peripheral release of calcitonin gene-related Peptide driven by dorsal root reflexes.

    Dingge Li;Yong Ren;Xijin Xu;Xiaoju Zou

  • Role of GABA receptor subtypes in inhibition of primate spinothalamic tract neurons: difference between spinal and periaqueductal gray inhibition

    Qing Lin;Yuan Bo Peng;William D. Willis

  • Protein kinases regulate the phosphorylation of the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors of spinal cord in rats following noxious stimulation

    Li Fang;Jing Wu;Qing Lin;William D. Willis

Frequent Co-Authors

William D. Willis
William D. Willis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Susan M. Carlton
Susan M. Carlton The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Claire E. Hulsebosch
Claire E. Hulsebosch The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Karin N. Westlund
Karin N. Westlund University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Qing Lin

Trending Scientists