World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Austria
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
17444
World Ranking
3227
National Ranking
22

Jürgen Sandkühler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Sandkühler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jürgen Sandkühler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Sandkühler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Austria Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Austria Leader Award

Overview

Jürgen Sandkühler is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with a significant emphasis on cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, and behavioral neuroscience. The subfields of their work also extend into molecular biology and neurology.

The main topics of Sandkühler's research include:

  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Sandkühler has published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Molecular Pain
  • Journal of Pain
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Pain
  • Glia

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Sandkühler are:

  • "GABAergic CaMKIIα+ Amygdala Output Attenuates Pain and Modulates Emotional-Motivational Behavior via Parabrachial Inhibition" (2022), published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Interferon-γ facilitates the synaptic transmission between primary afferent C-fibres and lamina I neurons in the rat spinal dorsal horn via microglia activation" (2020), published in Molecular Pain
  • "Lamina-specific properties of spinal astrocytes" (2021), published in Glia
  • "Fundamental sex differences in morphine withdrawal-induced neuronal plasticity" (2020), published in Pain
  • "Spontaneous, Voluntary, and Affective Behaviours in Rat Models of Pathological Pain" (2021), published in Frontiers in Pain Research

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Sandkühler's work. Frequent co-authors include Roni Hogri, Bernhard Heinke, Lidia Trofimova, Hannah Luise Teuchmann, and Ruth Drdla-Schutting.

Best Publications

  • Models and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia

    Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Corelease of two fast neurotransmitters at a central synapse

    Peter Jonas;Josef Bischofberger;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Synaptic plasticity in spinal lamina I projection neurons that mediate hyperalgesia.

    Hiroshi Ikeda;Bernhard Heinke;Bernhard Heinke;Ruth Ruscheweyh;Ruth Ruscheweyh;Jürgen Sandkühler;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Neurogenic neuroinflammation: inflammatory CNS reactions in response to neuronal activity

    Dimitris N. Xanthos;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Learning and memory in pain pathways

    Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Synaptic Amplifier of Inflammatory Pain in the Spinal Dorsal Horn

    Hiroshi Ikeda;Johanna Stark;Harald Fischer;Matthias Wagner

  • Understanding LTP in pain pathways

    Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Low-Frequency Stimulation of Afferent Aδ-Fibers Induces Long-Term Depression at Primary Afferent Synapses with Substantia Gelatinosa Neurons in the Rat

    J. Sandkühler;J. G. Chen;G. Cheng;M. Randić

  • Induction of long‐term potentiation at spinal synapses by noxious stimulation or nerve injury

    Jürgen Sandkühler;Xianguo Liu

  • Perceptual correlates of nociceptive long-term potentiation and long-term depression in humans.

    Thomas Klein;Walter Magerl;Hanns-Christian Hopf;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked potentials in the rat spinal dorsal horn is prevented by spinal N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor blockage.

    X.-G. Liu;J. Sandkühler

  • Characterization of long-term potentiation of C-fiber-evoked potentials in spinal dorsal horn of adult rat: essential role of NK1 and NK2 receptors.

    X.-G. Liu;J. Sandkühler

  • Relative contributions of the nucleus raphe magnus and adjacent medullary reticular formation to the inhibition by stimulation in the periaqueductal gray of a spinal nociceptive reflex in the pentobarbital-anesthetized rat

    J. Sandkühler;G.F. Gebhart

  • The organization and function of endogenous antinociceptive systems

    J. Sandkühler

  • Characterization of inhibition of a spinal nociceptive reflex by stimulation medially and laterally in the midbrain and medulla in the pentobarbital-anesthetized rat.

    J. Sandkühler;G.F. Gebhart

  • Induction of Synaptic Long-Term Potentiation After Opioid Withdrawal

    Ruth Drdla;Matthias Gassner;Ewald Gingl;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Long-term potentiation in spinal nociceptive pathways as a novel target for pain therapy.

    Ruth Ruscheweyh;Oliver Wilder-Smith;Ruth Drdla;Xian-Guo Liu

  • Physiological, neurochemical and morphological properties of a subgroup of GABAergic spinal lamina II neurones identified by expression of green fluorescent protein in mice

    Bernhard Heinke;Ruth Ruscheweyh;Liesbeth Forsthuber;Gabriele Wunderbaldinger

  • Lamina-specific membrane and discharge properties of rat spinal dorsal horn neurones in vitro

    Ruth Ruscheweyh;Ruth Ruscheweyh;Jürgen Sandkühler;Jürgen Sandkühler

  • Induction of Thermal Hyperalgesia and Synaptic Long-Term Potentiation in the Spinal Cord Lamina I by TNF-α and IL-1β is Mediated by Glial Cells

    Doris Gruber-Schoffnegger;Ruth Drdla-Schutting;Christoph Hönigsperger;Gabriele Wunderbaldinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Zimmermann
Manfred Zimmermann Heidelberg University
Xian-Guo Liu
Xian-Guo Liu Sun Yat-sen University
Gerald F. Gebhart
Gerald F. Gebhart University of Pittsburgh
Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Thomas Herdegen
Thomas Herdegen Kiel University
Walter Magerl
Walter Magerl Heidelberg University
Stefan Schwab
Stefan Schwab University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Wolfgang Kuschinsky
Wolfgang Kuschinsky Heidelberg University
Robert F. Schmidt
Robert F. Schmidt University of Würzburg
Ralf Schneggenburger
Ralf Schneggenburger École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Sandkühler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles