World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 43 6072 5854 5 5 556 8604

Oleg A. Sapozhnikov publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oleg A. Sapozhnikov between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oleg A. Sapozhnikov published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2017. 27 of the 598 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2017. 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 41 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 38 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 15 publications
1985 2025

598 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oleg A. Sapozhnikov: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 4
1986 2
1987 1
1988 4
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 3
1993 5
1994 8
1995 6
1996 9
1997 9
1998 8
1999 7
2000 12
2001 11
2002 8
2003 8
2004 9
2005 11
2006 24
2007 13
2008 12
2009 18
2010 22
2011 41
2012 20
2013 29
2014 16
2015 39
2016 38
2017 45
2018 25
2019 28
2020 14
2021 25
2022 19
2023 12
2024 12
2025 15
Total 598
Download as CSV

Oleg A. Sapozhnikov publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleg A. Sapozhnikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 548–557 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 556 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23 556
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Oleg A. Sapozhnikov D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oleg A. Sapozhnikov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380 43
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Oleg A. Sapozhnikov is affiliated with Lomonosov Moscow State University in the Russian Federation. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily in Engineering and Medicine, with a focus on Biomedical Engineering and related subfields.

Their work covers a range of specialized subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry, and Biophysics. The main topics addressed in their research include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications, Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography, Flow Measurement and Analysis, Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies, Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging, Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena, and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research.

Sapozhnikov has contributed to many scientific publications, frequently appearing in several established journals. The leading publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • Acoustical Physics
  • Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences Physics
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Their recent papers showcase a variety of topics related to acoustic manipulation, nonlinear acoustic fields, and histotripsy methods. Selected recent publications are:

  • Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The histotripsy spectrum: differences and similarities in techniques and instrumentation, 2023, International Journal of Hyperthermia
  • "HIFU Beam:" A Simulator for Predicting Axially Symmetric Nonlinear Acoustic Fields Generated by Focused Transducers in a Layered Medium, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • A Prototype Therapy System for Boiling Histotripsy in Abdominal Targets Based on a 256-Element Spiral Array, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • A review on B/A measurement methods with a clinical perspective, 2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

They have collaborated extensively with a number of researchers, including frequent co-authors:

  • Vera A. Khokhlova
  • Tatiana D. Khokhlova
  • S. A. Tsysar
  • Pavel B. Rosnitskiy
  • Adam D. Maxwell

Their body of work integrates advanced research in ultrasound technology, acoustic therapy, and biomedical imaging, reflecting interdisciplinary approaches bridging engineering and medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Nonlinear Wave Processes in Acoustics

    Konstantin A. Naugolnykh;Lev A. Ostrovsky;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Mark F. Hamilton

  • Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review)

    M. R. Bailey;V. A. Khokhlova;O. A. Sapozhnikov;S. G. Kargl

  • Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach.

    Michael S. Canney;Michael R. Bailey;Lawrence A. Crum;Vera A. Khokhlova

  • Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

    Adam D. Maxwell;Tzu Yin Wang;Charles A. Cain;J. Brian Fowlkes

  • Gel phantom for use in high-intensity focused ultrasound dosimetry

    Cyril Lafon;Vesna Zderic;Misty L. Noble;Jonathan C. Yuen

  • Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shockwaves

    Yuriy A. Pishchalnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • Radiation force of an arbitrary acoustic beam on an elastic sphere in a fluid

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey

  • Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling.

    Tatiana D. Khokhlova;Michael S. Canney;Vera A. Khokhlova;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro

    Michael R. Bailey;Lisa N. Couret;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova

  • A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Adam D. Maxwell;Brian MacConaghy;Michael R. Bailey

  • Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy

    Robin O. Cleveland;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude focused sound beams in time domain.

    Jahangir Tavakkoli;Dominique Cathignol;Rémi Souchon;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling

    W. Kreider;P. V. Yuldashev;O. A. Sapozhnikov;N. Farr

  • Numerical modeling of finite-amplitude sound beams: Shock formation in the near field of a cw plane piston source

    V. A. Khokhlova;R. Souchon;J. Tavakkoli;O. A. Sapozhnikov

  • New piezoelectric transducers for therapeutic ultrasound

    Jean Yves Chapelon;Dominique Cathignol;Charles Cain;Emad Ebbini

  • Disintegration of tissue using high intensity focused ultrasound: Two approaches that utilize shock waves

    Adam Maxwell;Oleg Sapozhnikov;Michael Bailey;Lawrence Crum

  • Acoustic holography as a metrological tool for characterizing medical ultrasound sources and fields.

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Sergey A. Tsysar;Vera A. Khokhlova;Wayne Kreider

  • Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body

    Mohamed A Ghanem;Adam D Maxwell;Yak-Nam Wang;Bryan W Cunitz

  • Cavitation detection during shock-wave lithotripsy.

    Michael R. Bailey;Yuri A. Pishchalnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Robin O. Cleveland

  • Fragmentation of Urinary Calculi In Vitro by Burst Wave Lithotripsy

    Adam D. Maxwell;Bryan W. Cunitz;Wayne Kreider;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Ultrasonic atomization of tissue and its role in tissue fractionation by high intensity focused ultrasound

    Julianna C. Simon;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova;Vera A. Khokhlova;Yak Nam Wang

  • A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.

    Robin O. Cleveland;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey;Lawrence A. Crum

Frequent Co-Authors

Vera A. Khokhlova
Vera A. Khokhlova Lomonosov Moscow State University
Lawrence A. Crum
Lawrence A. Crum University of Washington
Robin O. Cleveland
Robin O. Cleveland University of Oxford
Andrew P. Evan
Andrew P. Evan Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Thomas J. Matula
Thomas J. Matula University of Washington
Tim Colonius
Tim Colonius California Institute of Technology
Charles A. Cain
Charles A. Cain University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Matthew O'Donnell
Matthew O'Donnell University of Washington
Zhen Xu
Zhen Xu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Tao Sun
Tao Sun University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional campus programs, students interested in Engineering and Technology are increasingly exploring online degrees and alternative career routes. Flexible options like a sports management online degree are attractive to those interested in combining technology, analytics, and athletics. These programs provide opportunities to break into sports business, facility operations, and event management—all from the convenience of home.

For those motivated to tackle urban infrastructure or sustainable development, a masters in urban planning online can be completed at a competitive cost. This pathway leverages technology in city planning and prepares graduates for impactful roles in shaping tomorrow's cities.

Seeking a faster education track? New 6 months masters degree programs help driven students accelerate their professional growth and adapt quickly to industry demands.

If you are career-focused or looking to boost your earnings, there are many certifications that pay well in tech and engineering fields, offering high-impact skillsets without the time commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles