World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
7652
World Ranking
6039
National Ranking
2057

Scott D. Peacor publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Peacor sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Scott D. Peacor D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Peacor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott D. Peacor is a researcher affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, notably:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Scott D. Peacor has contributed to several publications, particularly in high-profile journals within ecology and conservation. Their recent papers include:

  • "A framework and standardized terminology to facilitate the study of predation-risk effects," 2020, Ecology
  • "A skewed literature: Few studies evaluate the contribution of predation-risk effects to natural field patterns," 2022, Ecology Letters

Additional related works from coauthors who frequently collaborate and provide broader context to their research include:

  • "Non-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence," 2020, Journal of Animal Ecology
  • "An assessment of statistical methods for nonindependent data in ecological meta-analyses," 2020, Ecology
  • "Population and community consequences of perceived risk from humans in wildlife," 2024, Ecology Letters

The publication outlets where Scott D. Peacor's work appears most often comprise:

  • Ecology
  • Ecology Letters
  • Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Hydrobiologia
  • Oikos

Frequent collaborators in Scott D. Peacor's research include colleagues such as Chao Song, Michael J. Sheriff, David L. Kimbro, Craig W. Osenberg, and James R. Bence. These partnerships reflect a collaborative approach across ecological and environmental studies.

Best Publications

  • A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES

    Earl E. Werner;Scott D. Peacor

  • Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions

    Andrew Sih;Daniel I. Bolnick;Barney Luttbeg;John L. Orrock

  • REVISITING THE CLASSICS: CONSIDERING NONCONSUMPTIVE EFFECTS IN TEXTBOOK EXAMPLES OF PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS

    Barbara L. Peckarsky;Peter A. Abrams;Daniel I. Bolnick;Lawrence M. Dill

  • The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator.

    Scott D. Peacor;Earl E. Werner

  • Large nonlethal effects of an invasive invertebrate predator on zooplankton population growth rate.

    Kevin L. Pangle;Scott D. Peacor;Scott D. Peacor;Ora E. Johannsson

  • Trait‐Mediated Indirect Interactions In A Simple Aquatic Food Web

    Scott D. Peacor;Earl E. Werner

  • PREDATOR EFFECTS ON AN ASSEMBLAGE OF CONSUMERS THROUGH INDUCED CHANGES IN CONSUMER FORAGING BEHAVIOR

    Scott D. Peacor;Earl E. Werner

  • Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour

    Scott D. Peacor

  • Non-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence.

    Michael J. Sheriff;Scott D. Peacor;Dror Hawlena;Maria Thaker

  • Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment

    Scott D. Peacor

  • CONSUMPTIVE AND NONCONSUMPTIVE EFFECTS OF PREDATORS ON METACOMMUNITIES OF COMPETING PREY

    John L. Orrock;John L. Orrock;Jonathan H. Grabowski;Jelena H. Pantel;Scott D. Peacor

  • Lethal and nonlethal predator effects on an herbivore guild mediated by system productivity.

    Earl E. Werner;Scott D. Peacor;Scott D. Peacor

  • Costs of predator-induced phenotypic plasticity: A graphical model for predicting the contribution of nonconsumptive and consumptive effects of predators on prey

    Scott D. Peacor;Barbara L. Peckarsky;Geoffrey C. Trussell;James R. Vonesh

  • Non-lethal effect of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus on Daphnia mendotae

    Kevin L. Pangle;Scott D. Peacor

  • Theoretical analysis of the thermal conductivity of YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 − δ single crystals

    S. D. Peacor;R. A. Richardson;F. Nori;C. Uher

  • Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion

    Andrea L. Jaeger Miehls;Andrea L. Jaeger Miehls;Doran M. Mason;Doran M. Mason;Kenneth A. Frank;Ann E. Krause

  • Behavioural response of bullfrog tadpoles to chemical cues of predation risk are affected by cue age and water source

    Scott D. Peacor;Scott D. Peacor

  • HOW DEPENDENT ARE SPECIES-PAIR INTERACTION STRENGTHS ON OTHER SPECIES IN THE FOOD WEB?

    Scott D. Peacor;Earl E. Werner

  • Opportunities for behavioral rescue under rapid environmental change.

    Samuel B. Fey;David A. Vasseur;Karla Alujević;Kristy J. Kroeker

  • A framework and standardized terminology to facilitate the study of predation-risk effects.

    Scott D. Peacor;Brandon T. Barton;David L. Kimbro;Andrew Sih

  • Magnetic X-Ray Dichroism Study of the Nearest-Neighbor Spin-Spin Correlation Function and Long-Range Magnetic Order Parameter in Antiferromagnetic NiO

    D. Alders;J. Vogei;C. Levelut;S. D. Peacor

  • REFLECTION HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRON-DIFFRACTION STUDY OF THE GROWTH OF NIO AND COO THIN-FILMS BY MOLECULAR-BEAM EPITAXY

    S.D. Peacor;T. Hibma

Frequent Co-Authors

Earl E. Werner
Earl E. Werner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ctirad Uher
Ctirad Uher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew Sih
Andrew Sih University of California, Davis
Stefano Allesina
Stefano Allesina University of Chicago
John L. Orrock
John L. Orrock University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara L. Peckarsky
Barbara L. Peckarsky University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew G. McAdam
Andrew G. McAdam University of Colorado Boulder
Doran M. Mason
Doran M. Mason National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James R. Bence
James R. Bence Michigan State University
Franco Nori
Franco Nori University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open the door to diverse career options, especially for those interested in environmental health, research, or biology education. Many students combine their science studies with healthcare pathways, and flexible online degree programs make this easier than ever.

For example, professionals looking to advance quickly in nursing may consider a rn to bsn in 6 months program. These accelerated options allow science-minded students to move into advanced roles rapidly.

If you already have an associate’s degree in nursing, transitioning from asn to np is a strategic way to shift from bedside care to research, leadership, or specialized practice—fields that often intersect with ecological health.

Those from non-nursing backgrounds can pursue science-based healthcare careers through online direct entry msn programs. These degrees support career pivots into high-demand fields where biology and health overlap.

When choosing the right online pathway, comparing key universities is essential. Unsure where to start? Review thorough comparisons such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn to find the best program for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Peacor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles