World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
8287
World Ranking
4437
National Ranking
1550

Andrew G. McAdam publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. McAdam sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 145 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Andrew G. McAdam D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew G. McAdam sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew G. McAdam is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these domains, their work centers on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, with substantial contributions also made in Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology, and Genetics.

The main topics covered in McAdam's published research include:

  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior

McAdam has appeared frequently in scientific journals. The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Animal Ecology
  • Animal Behaviour
  • Oecologia
  • Science

Selected recent papers by Andrew G. McAdam include:

  • "Genetic variance in fitness indicates rapid contemporary adaptive evolution in wild animals" (2022, Science)
  • "Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Familiar Neighbors, but Not Relatives, Enhance Fitness in a Territorial Mammal" (2020, Current Biology)
  • "MASTREE+: Time-series of plant reproductive effort from six continents" (2022, Global Change Biology)
  • "Attentive red squirrel mothers have faster growing pups and higher lifetime reproductive success" (2020, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)

Collaborative work features several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Stan Boutin
  • Ben Dantzer
  • Jeffrey E. Lane
  • David W. Coltman
  • Lauren Petrullo

Best Publications

  • Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change

    Denis Réale;Andrew G. McAdam;Stan Boutin;Dominique Berteaux

  • Seasonal, spatial, and maternal effects on gut microbiome in wild red squirrels.

    Tiantian Ren;Stan Boutin;Murray M. Humphries;Ben Dantzer

  • Density triggers maternal hormones that increase adaptive offspring growth in a wild mammal.

    Ben Dantzer;Amy E. M. Newman;Rudy Boonstra;Rupert Palme

  • Keeping Pace with Fast Climate Change: Can Arctic Life Count on Evolution?

    Dominique Berteaux;Denis Réale;Andrew G. McAdam;Stan Boutin

  • Anticipatory reproduction and population growth in seed predators

    Stan Boutin;Lucas A. Wauters;Andrew G. McAdam;Murray M. Humphries

  • Genetic variance in fitness indicates rapid contemporary adaptive evolution in wild animals

    Unknown

  • Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism.

    Barry Sinervo;Alexis Chaine;Jean Clobert;Ryan Calsbeek

  • Maternal effects and the potential for evolution in a natural population of animals.

    Andrew G. McAdam;Stan Boutin;Denis Réale;Dominique Berteaux

  • Life histories of female red squirrels and their contributions to population growth and lifetime fitness

    Andrew G. McADAM;Stan Boutin;Ainsley K. Sykes;Murray M. Humphries

  • Cohort effects in red squirrels: the influence of density, food abundance and temperature on future survival and reproductive success

    Sébastien Descamps;Sébastien Descamps;Stan Boutin;Dominique Berteaux;Andrew G. McAdam

  • The functional response of a hoarding seed predator to mast seeding

    Quinn E. Fletcher;Stan Boutin;Jeffrey E. Lane;Jalene M. LaMontagne

  • Fecal cortisol metabolite levels in free-ranging North American red squirrels: Assay validation and the effects of reproductive condition

    Ben Dantzer;Andrew G. McAdam;Andrew G. McAdam;Rupert Palme;Quinn E. Fletcher

  • Archiving primary data: Solutions for long-term studies

    James A. Mills;Céline Teplitsky;Beatriz Arroyo;Anne Charmantier

  • LIFETIME SELECTION ON HERITABLE LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF RED SQUIRRELS

    D. Réale;D. Berteaux;A. G. McAdam;S. Boutin

  • Associations between over-winter survival and resting metabolic rate in juvenile North American red squirrels

    Meghan L. Larivee;Stan Boutin;John Roger Speakman;Andrew G. McAdam

  • Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals

    Pierre de Villemereuil;Anne Charmantier;Debora Arlt;Pierre Bize

  • Causes of maladaptation

    Steven P. Brady;Daniel I. Bolnick;Amy L. Angert;Andrew Gonzalez

  • Constraints to projecting the effects of climate change on mammals

    D. Berteaux;M. M. Humphries;C. J. Krebs;M. Lima

  • Low heritabilities, but genetic and maternal correlations between red squirrel behaviours

    Ryan W Taylor;A K Boon;B Dantzer;D Réale

  • OXIDATIVE DAMAGE INCREASES WITH REPRODUCTIVE ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND IS REDUCED BY FOOD‐SUPPLEMENTATION

    Quinn E. Fletcher;Quinn E. Fletcher;Colin Selman;Stan Boutin;Andrew G. McAdam

  • Expenditure freeze: the metabolic response of small mammals to cold environments

    Murray M. Humphries;Stan Boutin;Donald W. Thomas;John D. Ryan

  • Variation in viability selection among cohorts of juvenile red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus).

    Andrew G. McAdam;Stan Boutin

Frequent Co-Authors

Stan Boutin
Stan Boutin University of Alberta
Murray M. Humphries
Murray M. Humphries McGill University
David W. Coltman
David W. Coltman University of Western Ontario
Rudy Boonstra
Rudy Boonstra University of Toronto
Rupert Palme
Rupert Palme University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Barry Sinervo
Barry Sinervo University of California, Santa Cruz
Dominique Berteaux
Dominique Berteaux Université du Québec à Rimouski
Denis Réale
Denis Réale University of Quebec at Montreal
Alastair J. Wilson
Alastair J. Wilson University of Exeter
John R. Speakman
John R. Speakman University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Ecology and Evolution can open diverse doors, especially for students considering healthcare careers that integrate biology knowledge. Many online degree pathways now support students with varied academic backgrounds, including direct entry into nursing and advanced practice.

For registered nurses seeking to become family nurse practitioners, programs like adn to fnp bridges make this transition entirely online. Similarly, those with non-nursing backgrounds can accelerate their entry into nursing with direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These flexible options are ideal for biology graduates interested in applied science roles.

Choosing the right online institution matters. Comparisons like capella university vs wgu rn to bsn help students find programs that fit their schedule and learning style, whether they prefer competency-based or traditional models.

Affordability is often a key concern. Many prospective students benefit from exploring options like the cheapest bsn to msn online programs, making advanced credentials more accessible and cost-effective.

Ultimately, online nursing and science-related degrees provide a seamless pathway for students passionate about life sciences to diversify their career opportunities and contribute to health, education, and research sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew G. McAdam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles