World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
13447
World Ranking
2922
National Ranking
1353

Claire E. Hulsebosch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire E. Hulsebosch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Claire E. Hulsebosch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claire E. Hulsebosch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claire E. Hulsebosch is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their work spans multiple disciplines within medicine and neuroscience, focusing on mechanisms related to pain and injury.

The main fields of study for Claire E. Hulsebosch include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Their research further delves into specialized subfields:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Key topics of research activity are:

  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Nerve injury and regeneration

Collaboration forms an important aspect of their scientific contributions. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Christine N. Sang
  • H. Alex Choi
  • Adriel Barrios-Anderson
  • David A. Borton
  • Thomas N. Bryce

Best Publications

  • Neocortical Neural Sprouting, Synaptogenesis, and Behavioral Recovery After Neocortical Infarction in Rats

    R. Paul Stroemer;Thomas A. Kent;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment of spinal cord injury

    Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Enhanced Neocortical Neural Sprouting, Synaptogenesis, and Behavioral Recovery With d-Amphetamine Therapy After Neocortical Infarction in Rats

    R. Paul Stroemer;Thomas A. Kent;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Mechanisms of chronic central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

    Claire E. Hulsebosch;Bryan C. Hains;Eric D. Crown;Susan M. Carlton

  • Chronic central pain after spinal cord injury.

    Marc D. Christensen;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Mechanical and thermal allodynia in chronic central pain following spinal cord injury

    Marc D Christensen;Alex W Everhart;Jason T Pickelman;Claire E Hulsebosch

  • Spatial and temporal activation of spinal glial cells: Role of gliopathy in central neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury in rats

    Young S. Gwak;Jonghoon Kang;Geda C. Unabia;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Peripheral and central sensitization in remote spinal cord regions contribute to central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury

    Susan M. Carlton;Junhui Du;Huai Yu Tan;Olivera Nesic

  • An analysis of the axon populations in the nerves to the pelvic viscera in the rat.

    Claire E. Hulsebosch;Richard E. Coggeshall

  • Spinal cord injury and anti-NGF treatment results in changes in CGRP density and distribution in the dorsal horn in the rat.

    Marc D. Christensen;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • GABA and central neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury

    Young S. Gwak;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • IL-1 Receptor Antagonist Prevents Apoptosis and Caspase-3 Activation after Spinal Cord Injury

    Olivera Nesic;Guo-Ying Xu;David McAdoo;Karin Westlund High

  • Alleviation of mechanical and thermal allodynia by CGRP8-37 in a rodent model of chronic central pain

    Adrianne D. Bennett;Kathy M. Chastain;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Increases in the activated forms of ERK 1/2, p38 MAPK, and CREB are correlated with the expression of at-level mechanical allodynia following spinal cord injury

    Eric D. Crown;Zaiming Ye;Kathia M. Johnson;Guo Ying Xu

  • Direct evidence of primary afferent sprouting in distant segments following spinal cord injury in the rat: colocalization of GAP-43 and CGRP.

    Adrianne B Ondarza;Zaiming Ye;Claire E Hulsebosch

  • Changes in serotonin, serotonin transporter expression and serotonin denervation supersensitivity: involvement in chronic central pain after spinal hemisection in the rat.

    Bryan C. Hains;Alex W. Everhart;Steven D. Fullwood;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Strain and model differences in behavioral outcomes after spinal cord injury in rat.

    Charles D. Mills;Bryan C. Hains;Kathia M. Johnson;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Remote astrocytic and microglial activation modulates neuronal hyperexcitability and below-level neuropathic pain after spinal injury in rat

    Young Seob Gwak;Claire E. Hulsebosch

  • Transcriptional profiling of spinal cord injury-induced central neuropathic pain.

    Olivera Nesic;Julieann Lee;Kathia M. Johnson;Zaiming Ye

  • Activation of p38 MAP kinase is involved in central neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury.

    Eric D. Crown;Young Seob Gwak;Zaiming Ye;Kathia M. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Coggeshall
Richard E. Coggeshall The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Karin N. Westlund
Karin N. Westlund University of New Mexico
Bryan C. Hains
Bryan C. Hains Yale University
William D. Willis
William D. Willis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Susan M. Carlton
Susan M. Carlton The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Kyungsoon Chung
Kyungsoon Chung The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Mary Pat Moyer
Mary Pat Moyer Incell Corporation (United States)
Howard M. Eisenberg
Howard M. Eisenberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Qing Lin
Qing Lin The University of Texas at Arlington
Giulio Taglialatela
Giulio Taglialatela The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of online degrees and professional certifications. Many students choose to supplement their studies with job certifications online. These credentials often provide specialized training and boost employability in research, healthcare, or applied behavioral roles.

For those considering workload and flexibility, you may wish to look into the easiest college majors available online. These options can make it easier to balance neuroscience interests with broader learning goals or busy schedules.

If your interests extend to mental health, an online MSW (Master of Social Work) may be a strategic pathway, allowing graduates to work with diverse populations in clinical or community settings. Likewise, those aiming to specialize in applied behavior analysis should research bcba accredited programs online. These programs are critical for roles in therapy, education, and behavioral health.

Whether you’re seeking affordability, flexibility, or a direct career path, there are numerous online study options connected to neuroscience that fit a wide range of academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Claire E. Hulsebosch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles