World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eva Widerström-Noga

Eva Widerström-Noga

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
5429
World Ranking
8586
National Ranking
3652

Eva Widerström-Noga publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Widerström-Noga sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eva Widerström-Noga D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva Widerström-Noga sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eva Widerström-Noga is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine, with significant contributions to pharmacology, neurology, physiology, pathology and forensic medicine, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main research topics include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain mechanisms and treatments
  • Spinal cord injury research
  • Botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Pediatric pain management techniques

Their publication record features a number of papers with a focus on spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain, and pain management. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Phase 1 Safety Trial of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury" (2021), published in Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update" (2022), published in Spinal Cord
  • "Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injury: Management, Phenotypes, and Biomarkers" (2023), published in Drugs
  • "Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Neuropathic Pain Management: SCI Consumer, Significant Other, and Health Care Provider Perspectives" (2020), published in Pain Medicine
  • "Maladaptive reorganization following SCI: The role of body representation and multisensory integration" (2021), published in Progress in Neurobiology

Frequent co-authors include Linda E. Robayo, Roberta Vastano, Nicholas P. Cherup, Varan Govind, and Marlon L. Wong. These collaborations indicate a strong research network within the fields of neuropathic pain and spinal cord injury research.

The scientist regularly publishes in these venues:

  • Frontiers in Pain Research
  • Spinal Cord
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Drugs

Best Publications

  • International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification: part I. Background and description

    Bryce Tn;Biering-Sørensen F;Finnerup Nb;Cardenas Dd

  • Chronic pain after spinal injury: interference with sleep and daily activities.

    Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Ernesto Felipe-Cuervo;Robert P. Yezierski

  • Perceived difficulty in dealing with consequences of spinal cord injury

    Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Ernesto Felipe-Cuervo;James G. Broton;James G. Broton;Robert C. Duncan

  • Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-based Review for Clinical Practice and Research: Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting

    Thomas N. Bryce;Cecilia Norrbrink Budh;Diana D. Cardenas;Marcel Dijkers

  • Safety of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Subacute Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.

    Kim D. Anderson;James D. Guest;W. Dalton Dietrich;Mary Bartlett Bunge

  • The international spinal cord injury pain basic data set.

    E Widerström-Noga;F Biering-Sørensen;T Bryce;D D Cardenas

  • The ACTTION-American Pain Society Pain Taxonomy (AAPT): An Evidence-Based and Multidimensional Approach to Classifying Chronic Pain Conditions

    Roger B. Fillingim;Stephen Bruehl;Robert H. Dworkin;Samuel F. Dworkin

  • Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of the Thalamus in Patients with Chronic Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury

    Pradip M. Pattany;Robert P. Yezierski;Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Brian C. Bowen

  • Types and effectiveness of treatments used by people with chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: influence of pain and psychosocial characteristics.

    E G Widerström-Noga;D C Turk

  • Biopsychosocial perspective on a mechanisms-based approach to assessment and treatment of pain following spinal cord injury.

    Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Nanna B. Finnerup;Philip J. Siddall

  • The International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (version 2.0)

    E Widerström-Noga;F Biering-Sørensen;T N Bryce;D D Cardenas

  • Chronicity of pain associated with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal analysis.

    Yenisel Cruz-Almeida;Alberto Martinez-Arizala;Eva G. Widerström-Noga

  • Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injury: Phenotypes and Pharmacological Management

    Eva Widerström-Noga

  • Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury.

    Jochen Kressler;Christine K. Thomas;Edelle C. Field-Fote;Justin Sanchez

  • Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

    Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Ernesto Felipe-Cuervo;Robert P. Yezierski

  • Common data elements for spinal cord injury clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke project.

    Fin Biering-Sørensen;Sherita Alai;Kim Anderson;Susan Charlifue

  • The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: Recommendations for treatment

    S D Guy;S D Guy;S Mehta;S Mehta;A Casalino;I Côté

  • Metabolite concentrations in the anterior cingulate cortex predict high neuropathic pain impact after spinal cord injury

    Eva Widerström-Noga;Pradip M. Pattany;Yenisel Cruz-Almeida;Yenisel Cruz-Almeida;Yenisel Cruz-Almeida;Elizabeth R. Felix;Elizabeth R. Felix

  • Assessment of the impact of pain and impairments associated with spinal cord injuries.

    Eva G. Widerström-Noga;Robert Duncan;Ernesto Felipe-Cuervo;Dennis C. Turk

  • Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.

    Elizabeth R Felix;Eva G Widerström-Noga

  • Reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set items as self-report measures

    M P Jensen;E Widerström-Noga;E Widerström-Noga;J S Richards;N B Finnerup

Frequent Co-Authors

Yenisel Cruz-Almeida
Yenisel Cruz-Almeida University of Florida
Nanna B. Finnerup
Nanna B. Finnerup Aarhus University
Philip J. Siddall
Philip J. Siddall University of Sydney
Christine K. Thomas
Christine K. Thomas University of Miami
Robert Teasell
Robert Teasell University of Western Ontario
Dennis C. Turk
Dennis C. Turk University of Washington
Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
Fin Biering-Sørensen
Fin Biering-Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Mark P. Jensen
Mark P. Jensen University of Washington
Thomas Lundeberg
Thomas Lundeberg Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for neuroscience professionals continues to grow, and a variety of online degree pathways now make it easier to start or advance in this field. For those seeking a faster route to graduation, consider an accelerated online bachelor's degree. These programs allow you to complete your studies more quickly while maintaining academic rigor.

When choosing a degree, it's wise to consider both your interests and long-term earning potential. Neuroscience is closely connected to some of the best bachelor's degrees and can open doors to several lucrative career options. In fact, many neuroscience-related majors rank among the highest paying college majors, particularly if you pursue roles in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, or research.

Financing your education is also more accessible than ever. Numerous online colleges that offer financial aid can help reduce tuition costs and make your career goals more attainable. Explore your options carefully to find the best fit for your needs and aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Eva Widerström-Noga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles