World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Lundeberg

Thomas Lundeberg

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
21402
World Ranking
15766
National Ranking
290

Thomas Lundeberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lundeberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas Lundeberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Lundeberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Lundeberg is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Rehabilitation, Surgery, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Their work also intersects with specialized areas such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and even Insect Science.

The main topics covered in Lundeberg's research include:

  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Bee Products Chemical Analysis
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment

Thomas Lundeberg has authored several research papers published in the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, a frequent venue for their work. The notable recent papers include:

  • "Effect of Laser Versus Placebo in Tennis Elbow" (2020), Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • "Pulsed ultrasound does not improve healing of venous ulcers" (2020), Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • "Vibratory Stimulation Compared to Placebo in Alleviation of Pain" (2020), Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

While some papers have other primary authors, Lundeberg has been closely associated with studies on ultrasound therapy and its effects in rehabilitation contexts. Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors involved in related research fields, such as:

  • Eva Haker
  • Sven V. Eriksson
  • Manu Thomas
  • Peter Abrahamsson
  • L. Bondesson

The research consistently explores methods to treat musculoskeletal conditions and chronic wounds, investigating interventions like laser therapy, ultrasound treatments, and vibratory stimulation. These efforts contribute to the understanding of therapeutic effectiveness in conditions such as tennis elbow, venous ulcers, and other musculoskeletal and wound-related disorders.

Best Publications

  • Activation of vagal afferents after intravenous injection of interleukin-1beta: role of endogenous prostaglandins.

    Monica Ek;Mieko Kurosawa;Thomas Lundeberg;Anders Ericsson

  • Are minimal, superficial or sham acupuncture procedures acceptable as inert placebo controls?

    Iréne Lund;Thomas Lundeberg

  • International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Classification: part I. Background and description

    Bryce Tn;Biering-Sørensen F;Finnerup Nb;Cardenas Dd

  • Pain alleviation by vibratory stimulation

    T. Lundeberg;R. Nordemar;D. Ottoson

  • Reliability and responsiveness of three different pain assessments.

    Thomas Lundeberg;Iréne Lund;Lisbeth Dahlin;Elsebet Borg

  • Effects of electro-acupuncture on anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    Elisabet Stener-Victorin;Urban Waldenström;Ulrika Tägnfors;Thomas Lundeberg

  • Oxytocin causes a long-term decrease of blood pressure in female and male rats

    Maria Petersson;Pawel Alster;Thomas Lundeberg;Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg

  • Effects of acupuncture on skin and muscle blood flow in healthy subjects

    Margareta Sandberg;Thomas Lundeberg;Lars-Göran Lindberg;Björn Gerdle

  • Repeated massage-like stimulation induces long-term effects on nociception: contribution of oxytocinergic mechanisms.

    Iréne Lund;Y Ge;Long-Chuan Yu;Kerstin Uvnas-Moberg

  • Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: An Evidence-based Review for Clinical Practice and Research: Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting

    Thomas N. Bryce;Cecilia Norrbrink Budh;Diana D. Cardenas;Marcel Dijkers

  • The antinociceptive effect of non-noxious sensory stimulation is mediated partly through oxytocinergic mechanisms

    K. UVNäS-MOBERG;G. Bruzelius;P. Alster;T. Lundeberg

  • Silver alloy coated catheters reduce catheter-associated bacteriuria.

    H. Liedberg;T. Lundeberg

  • Minimal acupuncture is not a valid placebo control in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: a physiologist's perspective

    Iréne Lund;Jan Näslund;Thomas Lundeberg

  • Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups.

    Iréne Lund;Thomas Lundeberg;Louise Sandberg;Cecilia Norrbrink Budh

  • Acupuncture and sensory neuropeptides increase cutaneous blood flow in rats.

    G. Jansen;T. Lundeberg;J. Kjartansson;U.E. Samuelson;U.E. Samuelson

  • Sensory stimulation (TENS): effects of parameter manipulation on mechanical pain thresholds in healthy human subjects.

    Linda S Chesterton;Panos Barlas;Nadine E Foster;Thomas Lundeberg

  • Defining an adequate dose of acupuncture using a neurophysiological approach--a narrative review of the literature.

    Adrian White;Mike Cummings;Panos Barlas;Francesco Cardini

  • Effects of Electro-Acupuncture on Nerve Growth Factor and Ovarian Morphology in Rats with Experimentally Induced Polycystic Ovaries

    Elisabet Stener-Victorin;Thomas Lundeberg;Urban Waldenström;Luigi Manni

  • Anti-nociceptive effects of oxytocin in rats and mice

    Thomas Lundeberg;Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg;Greta Ågren;Gunilla Bruzelius

  • Acupuncture treatment in epicondylalgia: a comparative study of two acupuncture techniques

    Eva Haker;Thomas Lundeberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Elvar Theodorsson
Elvar Theodorsson Linköping University
Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg
Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Elisabet Stener-Victorin
Elisabet Stener-Victorin Karolinska Institute
Luigi Aloe
Luigi Aloe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Per Hansson
Per Hansson Karolinska Institute
Bengt Linderoth
Bengt Linderoth Karolinska Institute
Philip J. Siddall
Philip J. Siddall University of Sydney
Nanna B. Finnerup
Nanna B. Finnerup Aarhus University
Eva Widerström-Noga
Eva Widerström-Noga University of Miami
Joakim Lundeberg
Joakim Lundeberg Royal Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in medicine but want more flexibility, online healthcare programs can offer accessible alternatives. There are many affordable nursing programs available online, allowing students to start or advance their careers while balancing other commitments.

For current nurses seeking higher qualifications, exploring a phd nursing education online can open doors to leadership and research roles. If you are an RN aiming to expand your options, the cheapest bsn programs online offer a cost-effective way to earn your bachelor's degree and boost career opportunities.

Those with a non-nursing background who wish to pivot into healthcare might consider direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online. These accelerated pathways prepare students for advanced practice nurse roles with a fast-track curriculum. With the growing demand for healthcare professionals, these diverse online degrees provide multiple pathways to rewarding careers within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Lundeberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles