World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bengt Linderoth

Bengt Linderoth

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
72
Citations
15677
World Ranking
2342
National Ranking
43

Bengt Linderoth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Linderoth sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 238 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bengt Linderoth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Linderoth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bengt Linderoth is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden. Their research focuses predominantly on medicine and neuroscience, with specific emphasis on anesthesiology and pain medicine, cellular and molecular neuroscience, pharmacology, neurology, and physiology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Bengt Linderoth has contributed to various publication venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Pain
  • European Journal of Pain

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • The cholinergic system in subtypes of Alzheimer's disease: an in vivo longitudinal MRI study, 2020, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • High-dose spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a multicenter effectiveness and prediction study, 2020, Pain
  • Identifying goals in patients with chronic pain: A European survey, 2021, European Journal of Pain
  • Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • A Review of Techniques for Biodelivery of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) to the Brain in Relation to Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Maria Eriksdotter
  • Lars U. Wahlberg
  • Sumonto Mitra
  • Homira Behbahani
  • Lisa Goudman

Best Publications

  • The Appropriate Use of Neurostimulation of the Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nervous System for the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Ischemic Diseases: The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee

    Timothy R. Deer;Nagy Mekhail;David Provenzano;Jason Pope

  • Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GABAergic mechanism

    Jian-Guo Cui;William T O'Connor;Urban Ungerstedt;Bengt Linderoth

  • Possible role of inflammatory mediators in tactile hypersensitivity in rat models of mononeuropathy

    Jian-Guo Cui;Staffan Holmin;Tiit Mathiesen;Björn A. Meyerson

  • Motor cortex stimulation as treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

    B. A. Meyerson;U. Lindblom;B. Linderoth;G. Lind

  • Physiology of spinal cord stimulation: review and update.

    Bengt Linderoth;Robert D Foreman

  • Release of gamma-aminobutyric acid in the dorsal horn and suppression of tactile allodynia by spinal cord stimulation in mononeuropathic rats.

    Carl-Olav Stiller;Jian-Guo Cui;William T. O'Connor;Ernst Brodin

  • Cardiac neuromodulation and methods of using same

    Robert D. Foreman;Jeffrey L. Ardell;John A. Armour;Michael J. L. DeJongste

  • Parameters of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Their Role in Electrical Charge Delivery: A Review

    Jonathan P. Miller;Sam Eldabe;Eric Buchser;Lisa M. Johanek

  • Spinal cord stimulation attenuates dorsal horn neuronal hyperexcitability in a rat model of mononeuropathy

    Vadym Yakhnitsa;Bengt Linderoth;Björn A Meyerson

  • Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris.

    Robert D. Foreman;Bengt Linderoth;Jeffrey L. Ardell;Kirk W. Barron

  • Dorsal column stimulation induces release of serotonin and substance P in the cat dorsal horn.

    Bengt Linderoth;Bertil Gazelius;Johan Franck;Ernst Brodin

  • Effects of spinal cord stimulation on touch-evoked allodynia involve GABAergic mechanisms. An experimental study in the mononeuropathic rat

    Jian-Guo Cui;Bengt Linderoth;Björn A. Meyerson

  • Intrathecal baclofen for long-term treatment of spasticity: a multi-centre study

    G Ochs;A Struppler;B A Meyerson;B Linderoth

  • Conventional and Novel Spinal Stimulation Algorithms: Hypothetical Mechanisms of Action and Comments on Outcomes

    Bengt Linderoth;Robert D. Foreman

  • Effects of sympathectomy on skin and muscle microcirculation during dorsal column stimulation: animal studies.

    Bengt Linderoth;Lal Gunasekera;Björn A. Meyerson

  • Cholinergic mechanisms involved in the pain relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation in a model of neuropathy

    Gastón Schechtmann;Zhiyang Song;Camilla Ultenius;Björn A. Meyerson

  • Spinal NMDA receptor phosphorylation correlates with the presence of neuropathic signs following peripheral nerve injury in the rat

    Camilla Ultenius;Bengt Linderoth;Björn A. Meyerson;Johan Wallin

  • Effect of spinal cord stimulation on tactile hypersensitivity in mononeuropathic rats is potentiated by simultaneous GABAB and adenosine receptor activation

    Jian-Guo Cui;Björn A Meyerson;Alf Sollevi;Bengt Linderoth

  • Pain relief by spinal cord stimulation involves serotonergic mechanisms: An experimental study in a rat model of mononeuropathy

    Zhiyang Song;Camilla Ultenius;Björn A. Meyerson;Bengt Linderoth

  • Microdialysis in the human brain: extracellular measurements in the thalamus of parkinsonian patients.

    B.A. Meyerson;B. Linderoth;H. Karlsson;U. Ungerstedt

Frequent Co-Authors

Björn A. Meyerson
Björn A. Meyerson Karolinska Institute
Robert D. Foreman
Robert D. Foreman University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Maria Eriksdotter
Maria Eriksdotter Karolinska Institute
Ernst Brodin
Ernst Brodin Karolinska Institute
Åke Seiger
Åke Seiger Karolinska Institute
Lars-Olof Wahlund
Lars-Olof Wahlund Karolinska Institute
Eric Westman
Eric Westman Karolinska Institute
Yun Guan
Yun Guan Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Elbert A.J. Joosten
Elbert A.J. Joosten Maastricht University
Agneta Nordberg
Agneta Nordberg Karolinska University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to diverse opportunities, both in higher education and the workforce. Many students interested in this field consider highest paying jobs when planning their career pathway. Neuroscience backgrounds can lead to competitive roles in healthcare, research, and technology.

Online education has expanded access to neuroscience-related studies. Students can choose from several fafsa-approved online certificate programs, making it easier to finance their education and build a foundation in the field.

For those seeking a quicker entry into the job market, there are a range of online certifications that pay well. These can boost your skills in specialized neuroscience areas, such as data analysis, healthcare administration, or digital health.

If you’re searching for flexible education options, a variety of online college degrees are available. Whether you’re looking for entry-level positions or aiming to specialize further, online programs provide accessibility and convenience for aspiring neuroscience professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Bengt Linderoth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles