World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
16684
World Ranking
2528
National Ranking
1197

Robert D. Foreman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Foreman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 299 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert D. Foreman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Foreman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. Foreman is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable contributions in several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gastroenterology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The research topics frequently addressed by Foreman encompass Pain Management and Treatment, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research, Gastrointestinal motility and disorders, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, as well as EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Foreman has published in a variety of scientific venues, with multiple papers in Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. Other publication venues include The Journal of Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Selected recent publications include:

  • "Effects of electroacupuncture on stress-induced gastric dysrhythmia and mechanisms involving autonomic and central nervous systems in functional dyspepsia," 2020, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
  • "Neurocardiology: translational advancements and potential," 2024, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Sacral nerve stimulation increases gastric accommodation in rats: a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway," 2020, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
  • "Spinal neuromodulation mitigates myocardial ischemia-induced sympathoexcitation by suppressing the intermediolateral nucleus hyperactivity and spinal neural synchrony," 2023, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Comparing the Memory Effects of 50-Hz Low-Frequency and 10-kHz High-Frequency Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Spinal Neural Network in a Myocardial Infarction Porcine Model," 2024, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface

Foreman collaborates frequently with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Jeffrey L. Ardell (6 coauthored papers)
  • Siamak Salavatian (6 coauthored papers)
  • Aman Mahajan (5 coauthored papers)
  • Yuki Kuwabara (4 coauthored papers)
  • Benjamin Wong (4 coauthored papers)

Best Publications

  • Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction.

    E Vanoli;G M De Ferrari;M Stramba-Badiale;S S Hull

  • Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death. New insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction.

    P J Schwartz;E Vanoli;M Stramba-Badiale;G M De Ferrari

  • The Appropriate Use of Neurostimulation of the Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nervous System for the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Ischemic Diseases: The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee

    Timothy R. Deer;Nagy Mekhail;David Provenzano;Jason Pope

  • Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia.

    Stephen S. Hull;Emilio Vanoli;Philip B. Adamson;Richard L. Verrier

  • Physiology of spinal cord stimulation: review and update.

    Bengt Linderoth;Robert D Foreman

  • MECHANISMS OF CARDIAC PAIN

    Foreman Rd

  • Cardiac neuromodulation and methods of using same

    Robert D. Foreman;Jeffrey L. Ardell;John A. Armour;Michael J. L. DeJongste

  • Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris.

    Robert D. Foreman;Bengt Linderoth;Jeffrey L. Ardell;Kirk W. Barron

  • The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.

    Timothy R. Deer;Nagy Mekhail;David Provenzano;Jason Pope

  • Convergence of cutaneous and pelvic visceral nociceptive inputs onto primate spinothalamic neurons.

    R.J. Milne;R.J. Milne;R.D. Foreman;R.D. Foreman;G.J. Giesler;G.J. Giesler;W.D. Willis;W.D. Willis

  • Conventional and Novel Spinal Stimulation Algorithms: Hypothetical Mechanisms of Action and Comments on Outcomes

    Bengt Linderoth;Robert D. Foreman

  • Decreased activity of spontaneous and noxiously evoked dorsal horn cells during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

    David W. Garrison;Robert D. Foreman

  • Spinal cord potentials evoked by cutaneous afferents in the monkey.

    J. E. Beall;A. E. Applebaum;R. D. Foreman;W. D. Willis

  • Putative mechanisms behind effects of spinal cord stimulation on vascular diseases: a review of experimental studies.

    Mingyuan Wu;Bengt Linderoth;Robert D. Foreman

  • Heart rate variability before and after myocardial infarction in conscious dogs at high and low risk of sudden death.

    Stephen S. Hull;Angela R. Evans;Emilio Vanoli;Philip B. Adamson

  • Translational neurocardiology: preclinical models and cardioneural integrative aspects.

    J. L. Ardell;M. C. Andresen;J. A. Armour;G. E. Billman

  • Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Syndromes: Role of Animal Models

    Bengt Linderoth;Robert D. Foreman

  • Effects of dorsal column stimulation on primate spinothalamic tract neurons.

    R. D. Foreman;J. E. Beall;J. D. Coulter;W. D. Willis

  • Stereotaxic delivery of corticosterone to the amygdala modulates colonic sensitivity in rats.

    Beverley Greenwood Van Meerveld;Matthew Gibson;Wesley Gunter;Jack Shepard

  • Effects of mechanical and chemical stimulation of fine muscle afferents upon primate spinothalamic tract cells.

    R D Foreman;R F Schmidt;W D Willis

  • Mechanisms of cardiac pain.

    Robert D Foreman;Kennon M Garrett;Robert W Blair

Frequent Co-Authors

Bengt Linderoth
Bengt Linderoth Karolinska Institute
Peter J. Schwartz
Peter J. Schwartz Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld
Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Donald C. Bolser
Donald C. Bolser University of Florida
Jian Xing Ma
Jian Xing Ma University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Sean Crosson
Sean Crosson University of Chicago
Michael C. Andresen
Michael C. Andresen Oregon Health & Science University
Hans-Georg Schaible
Hans-Georg Schaible Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Jean-Claude Willer
Jean-Claude Willer Sorbonne University
Björn A. Meyerson
Björn A. Meyerson Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Foreman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles