World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wim Notebaert

Wim Notebaert

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6965
World Ranking
8536
National Ranking
122

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
6968
World Ranking
8280
National Ranking
99

Wim Notebaert publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Notebaert sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 114 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wim Notebaert D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim Notebaert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim Notebaert is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has produced research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work encompasses several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, general decision sciences, applied psychology, social psychology, and neurology.

Their research covers a range of topics with an emphasis on neural and behavioral psychology studies, decision-making and behavioral economics, behavioral health and interventions, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neural dynamics and brain function, motor control and adaptation, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Notebaert has published multiple papers in various scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Shared Neural Representations of Cognitive Conflict and Negative Affect in the Medial Frontal Cortex," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Cognitive and Affective Theory of Mind in Healthy Aging," 2020, Experimental Aging Research
  • "Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies," 2024, Communications Psychology
  • "The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching," 2022, Cognition
  • "Correct responses alleviate the negative evaluation of conflict," 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Frequent publication venues for Notebaert's work include:

  • Communications Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Collabra Psychology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Experimental Aging Research

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Notebaert's research profile. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Senne Braem
  • Luc Vermeylen
  • Ruth M. Krebs
  • Иван Иванчей
  • C. Nico Boehler

Their body of work integrates cognitive neuroscience with practical applications related to decision-making processes and behavioral interventions. This multidisciplinary approach supports a broad investigation of neural mechanisms underlying cognitive and affective functions across different populations and contexts.

Best Publications

  • Post-error slowing: an orienting account.

    Wim Notebaert;Femke Houtman;Filip Van Opstal;Wim Gevers

  • Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control.

    Tom Verguts;Wim Notebaert

  • Hebbian Learning of Cognitive Control : Dealing With Specific and Nonspecific Adaptation

    Tom Verguts;Wim Notebaert

  • Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks

    Senne Braem;Julie M. Bugg;James R. Schmidt;Matthew J.C. Crump

  • Grounding cognitive control in associative learning.

    Elger Abrahamse;Senne Braem;Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect

    Wim Gevers;Jan Lammertyn;Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects.

    Wim Notebaert;Wim Gevers;Frederick Verbruggen;Baptist Liefooghe

  • Cognitive control acts locally.

    Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Reward Modulates Adaptations to Conflict.

    Senne Braem;Tom Verguts;Chantal Roggeman;Wim Notebaert

  • What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis

    Senne Braem;Elger L. Abrahamse;Wout Duthoo;Wim Notebaert

  • The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update

    Wout Duthoo;Elger L. Abrahamse;Senne Braem;Carsten N. Boehler

  • Stimulus-and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Wim Notebaert;Baptist Liefooghe;André Vandierendonck

  • Outcome Expectancy and Not Accuracy Determines Posterror Slowing: ERP Support

    Elena Patricia Nunez Castellar;Simone Kühn;Simone Kühn;Wim Fias;Wim Notebaert

  • Open your eyes for prediction errors.

    Senne Braem;Ena Coenen;Klaas Bombeke;Marlies E. van Bochove

  • Sequential analysis of a Simon task--evidence for an attention-shift account.

    Wim Notebaert;Eric Soetens;Annemie Melis

  • Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.

    Frederick Verbruggen;Baptist Liefooghe;Wim Notebaert;André Vandierendonck

  • The Congruency Sequence Effect 3.0: A Critical Test of Conflict Adaptation

    Wout Duthoo;Elger L. Abrahamse;Senne Braem;C. Nico Boehler

  • The role of the striatum in effort-based decision-making in the absence of reward

    N. Schouppe;J. Demanet;C.N. Boehler;K.R. Ridderinkhof

  • Sequence learning and sequential effects

    Eric Soetens;Annemie Melis;Wim Notebaert

  • Post-conflict slowing: cognitive adaptation after conflict processing

    Tom Verguts;Wim Notebaert;Wilfried Kunde;Peter Wühr

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Verguts
Tom Verguts Ghent University
Wim Gevers
Wim Gevers Université Libre de Bruxelles
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University
Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen Ghent University
Marcel Brass
Marcel Brass Ghent University
Carsten N. Boehler
Carsten N. Boehler Ghent University
Philippe Peigneux
Philippe Peigneux Université Libre de Bruxelles
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
André Vandierendonck
André Vandierendonck Ghent University
Boris Burle
Boris Burle Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to various interdisciplinary and meaningful careers. For students considering flexible learning options, several affordable online degrees can complement or expand your career in mental health, psychology, and social services.

If you’re interested in counseling and therapy, online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) are increasingly popular for those who want to help families and couples. For broader study, the psychology degree offers a solid foundation in human behavior and cognitive sciences, and many programs allow you to study online at your own pace.

Considering graduate education? You can explore the cheapest online master’s in psychology for affordable options that prepare you for roles in research, clinical work, or education. For those interested in social work, some of the msw degree (Master of Social Work) programs are accessible online and offer clear paths toward licensure and impactful careers in community mental health.

Each of these online pathways can pair well with neuroscience and support a diverse range of rewarding professions.

Best Scientists Citing Wim Notebaert

Trending Scientists