World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7206 6719 343 337 178 8699

Andrea Kiesel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Kiesel between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Kiesel published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2022. 24 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2022. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 15 publications
2003 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Kiesel: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 9
2008 6
2009 5
2010 8
2011 11
2012 21
2013 4
2014 8
2015 5
2016 12
2017 12
2018 14
2019 8
2020 15
2021 20
2022 25
2023 11
2024 9
2025 15
Total 227
Download as CSV

Andrea Kiesel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Kiesel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 178
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea Kiesel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Kiesel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrea Kiesel is a researcher affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany. Their academic work spans key areas in neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology subfields. Kiesel has contributed extensively to the understanding of neural and behavioral psychology, behavioral health and interventions, and human-automation interaction and safety.

Their research topics include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Motor Control and Adaptation

Kiesel has published in several specialized journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Psychological Research
  • Journal of Cognition
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Notable recent papers include:

  • Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC), 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Human-machine symbiosis: A multivariate perspective for physically coupled human-machine systems, 2022, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: Exploring a motion-based approach for virtual reality experiments, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control, 2024, Communications Psychology

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors, the most frequent being:

  • David Dignath
  • Roland Thomaschke
  • Christian Frings
  • Iring Koch
  • Moritz Schiltenwolf

Andrea Kiesel's main fields of study consist primarily of neuroscience and psychology, with a predominant focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research approach integrates these disciplines to address complex questions concerning perception, action control, and human-machine interactions.

Best Publications

  • Control and interference in task switching--a review.

    Andrea Kiesel;Marco Steinhauser;Mike Wendt;Michael Falkenstein

  • Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.

    Iring Koch;Edita Poljac;Hermann Müller;Andrea Kiesel

  • Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods.

    Andrea Kiesel;Jeff Miller;Pierre Jolicoeur;Benoit Brisson

  • Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition.

    Wilfried Kunde;Andrea Kiesel;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).

    Christian Frings;Bernhard Hommel;Iring Koch;Klaus Rothermund

  • The stressed prefrontal cortex and goal-directed behaviour: acute psychosocial stress impairs the flexible implementation of task goals

    Franziska Plessow;Andrea Kiesel;Clemens Kirschbaum

  • Mechanisms of subliminal response priming.

    Andrea Kiesel;Wilfried Kunde;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effects

    Andrea Kiesel;Mike Wendt;Alexandra Peters

  • Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs

    Tilo Strobach;Tilo Strobach;Roman Liepelt;Torsten Schubert;Torsten Schubert;Andrea Kiesel

  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

    David Dignath;Andreas B. Eder;Marco Steinhauser;Andrea Kiesel

  • Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans.

    Andrea Kiesel;Annika Wagener;Wilfried Kunde;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.

    Andrea Kiesel;Wilfried Kunde;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Playing chess unconsciously.

    Andrea Kiesel;Wilfried Kunde;Carsten Pohl;Michael P. Berner

  • Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions

    Roland Pfister;Andrea Kiesel;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.

    Roland Pfister;Andrea Kiesel;Tobias Melcher

  • Consciousness and cognitive control.

    Wilfried Kunde;Heiko Reuss;Andrea Kiesel

  • No anticipation–no action: the role of anticipation in action and perception

    Wilfried Kunde;Katrin Elsner;Andrea Kiesel

  • Variable action effects: response control by context-specific effect anticipations.

    Andrea Kiesel;Joachim Hoffmann

  • Context-specific prime-congruency effects: on the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control.

    Alexander Heinemann;Wilfried Kunde;Andrea Kiesel

  • Unconscious activation of task sets

    Heiko Reuss;Andrea Kiesel;Wilfried Kunde;Bernhard Hommel

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilfried Kunde
Wilfried Kunde University of Würzburg
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Joachim Hoffmann
Joachim Hoffmann University of Würzburg
Florian Waszak
Florian Waszak Université Paris Cité
Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller University of Otago
Rico Fischer
Rico Fischer University of Greifswald
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Marco Steinhauser
Marco Steinhauser Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Christian Frings
Christian Frings University of Trier
Andrea M. Philipp
Andrea M. Philipp RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to numerous rewarding career options. One popular path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires advanced coursework, supervised experience, and passing a national exam. The demand for BCBAs is high across the country, making it a strong career choice for those interested in applied behavior analysis.

Aspiring BCBAs should know that requirements can vary by location. For example, you can learn about the steps to becoming a bcba in Boston, including educational and fieldwork standards. Similarly, if you are interested in working in New York State, review the bcba certification requirements in Buffalo to ensure you meet licensing criteria.

Further west, different regulations may apply. For those pursuing opportunities in Arizona, check out the bcba certification requirements in Chandler. In North Carolina, our resource on becoming a bcba in Charlotte provides a helpful overview of the local pathway.

Online psychology degrees can be a flexible and accessible way to start your journey in the field. No matter where you live, researching location-specific requirements is key to a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Kiesel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles