World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5509
World Ranking
10806
National Ranking
524

Marco Steinhauser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Steinhauser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marco Steinhauser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Steinhauser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Steinhauser is affiliated with the Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. The scientist's work intersects several subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, safety and risk analysis, and general decision sciences.

Their research addresses diverse topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural dynamics and brain function, human-automation interaction and safety, traffic and road safety, memory and neural mechanisms, and decision-making and behavioral economics.

Steinhauser's publication record shows frequent contributions to key academic venues, notably Psychophysiology, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, NeuroImage, and Accident Analysis & Prevention. The recurring presence in these journals reflects a focus on the physiological and cognitive aspects of behavioral and neural research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Steinhauser include:

  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cognitive modelling reveals distinct electrophysiological markers of decision confidence and error monitoring, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Error-related cardiac deceleration: Functional interplay between error-related brain activity and autonomic nervous system in performance monitoring, 2024, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance, 2020, Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Development of the Questionnaire on the Acceptance of Automated Driving (QAAD): Data-driven models for Level 3 and Level 5 automated driving, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Steinhauser collaborates regularly with several researchers in related fields. Frequent co-authors include Martin E. Maier, Robert Steinhauser, Benjamin Ernst, Klemens Weigl, and Andreas Riener, indicating ongoing partnerships in projects within cognitive neuroscience and human factors research.

Best Publications

  • Control and interference in task switching--a review.

    Andrea Kiesel;Marco Steinhauser;Mike Wendt;Michael Falkenstein

  • Decision Processes in Human Performance Monitoring

    Marco Steinhauser;Nick Yeung

  • A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention.

    Ronald Hübner;Marco Steinhauser;Carola Lehle

  • Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict

    Claudia Danielmeier;Jan R. Wessel;Marco Steinhauser;Markus Ullsperger

  • Distinguishing Response Conflict and Task Conflict in the Stroop Task: Evidence From Ex-Gaussian Distribution Analysis

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Error-related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors.

    Martin E. Maier;Martin E. Maier;Nick Yeung;Marco Steinhauser

  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

    David Dignath;Andreas B. Eder;Marco Steinhauser;Andrea Kiesel

  • Stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances adaptive cognitive control: A high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation study

    Oyetunde Gbadeyan;Katie McMahon;Marco Steinhauser;Marcus Meinzer

  • Cognitive Control Under Stress How Stress Affects Strategies of Task-Set Reconfiguration

    Marco Steinhauser;Martin Maier;Ronald Hübner

  • Error awareness as evidence accumulation: effects of speed-accuracy trade-off on error signaling

    Marco Steinhauser;Marco Steinhauser;Nick Yeung

  • On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts.

    Ronald Hübner;Torsten Futterer;Marco Steinhauser

  • Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types

    Martin Maier;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Safety, Tolerability, Blinding Efficacy and Behavioural Effects of a Novel MRI-Compatible, High-Definition tDCS Set-Up

    Oyetunde Gbadeyan;Marco Steinhauser;Katie McMahon;Marcus Meinzer

  • Effects of emotions on driving behavior

    Klara Steinhauser;Felix Leist;Kathrin Maier;Vera Michel

  • Response-based strengthening in task shifting : evidence from shift effects produced by errors

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Errors can elicit an error positivity in the absence of an error negativity: Evidence for independent systems of human error monitoring.

    Francesco Di Gregorio;Martin E. Maier;Marco Steinhauser

  • The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making

    Anja Achtziger;Carlos Alós-Ferrer;Sabine Hügelschäfer;Marco Steinhauser

  • Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: what is more effortful?

    Carola Lehle;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring

    Marco Steinhauser;Martin Maier;Ronald Hübner

  • Burdens of non-conformity: Motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations.

    Roland Pfister;Robert Wirth;Katharina A. Schwarz;Marco Steinhauser

  • Monitoring and control in multitasking

    Stefanie Schuch;David Dignath;Marco Steinhauser;Markus Janczyk

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Hübner
Ronald Hübner University of Konstanz
Marcus Meinzer
Marcus Meinzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology
Andrea Kiesel
Andrea Kiesel University of Freiburg
Wilfried Kunde
Wilfried Kunde University of Würzburg
Markus Janczyk
Markus Janczyk University of Bremen
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Markus Ullsperger
Markus Ullsperger Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in psychology opens the door to several rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many students interested in psychology consider social work due to its close connection to mental health, counseling, and community support. However, pursuing a social work career in the USA involves meeting specific educational and licensure requirements that differ from state to state.

For example, the requirements to be a social worker in Tennessee include completing an accredited social work program and passing a state-specific exam. Similarly, understanding the Texas social work education requirements is crucial if you plan to practice in Texas, as the state mandates coursework in specific areas and supervised clinical hours.

Some states, like Utah, highlight particular academic requirements and supervised practice, as outlined in the requirements to be a social worker in Utah. Vermont has its own unique pathway, detailed in the Vermont social work education requirements, which also emphasizes continuing education.

Exploring online degrees in psychology or social work can help meet these diverse state requirements, giving you the flexibility to launch a meaningful and impactful career in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Steinhauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles