World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10806 10118 524 516 101 5509

Marco Steinhauser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Steinhauser between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Steinhauser published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2019. 10 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2019. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Steinhauser: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 5
2010 5
2011 2
2012 4
2013 1
2014 1
2015 3
2016 8
2017 13
2018 12
2019 14
2020 12
2021 10
2022 8
2023 5
2024 5
2025 5
Total 121
Download as CSV

Marco Steinhauser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Steinhauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Steinhauser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Steinhauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco Steinhauser is affiliated with the Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. The scientist's work intersects several subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, safety and risk analysis, and general decision sciences.

Their research addresses diverse topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural dynamics and brain function, human-automation interaction and safety, traffic and road safety, memory and neural mechanisms, and decision-making and behavioral economics.

Steinhauser's publication record shows frequent contributions to key academic venues, notably Psychophysiology, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, NeuroImage, and Accident Analysis & Prevention. The recurring presence in these journals reflects a focus on the physiological and cognitive aspects of behavioral and neural research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Steinhauser include:

  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review, 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cognitive modelling reveals distinct electrophysiological markers of decision confidence and error monitoring, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Error-related cardiac deceleration: Functional interplay between error-related brain activity and autonomic nervous system in performance monitoring, 2024, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance, 2020, Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Development of the Questionnaire on the Acceptance of Automated Driving (QAAD): Data-driven models for Level 3 and Level 5 automated driving, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Steinhauser collaborates regularly with several researchers in related fields. Frequent co-authors include Martin E. Maier, Robert Steinhauser, Benjamin Ernst, Klemens Weigl, and Andreas Riener, indicating ongoing partnerships in projects within cognitive neuroscience and human factors research.

Best Publications

  • Control and interference in task switching--a review.

    Andrea Kiesel;Marco Steinhauser;Mike Wendt;Michael Falkenstein

  • Decision Processes in Human Performance Monitoring

    Marco Steinhauser;Nick Yeung

  • A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention.

    Ronald Hübner;Marco Steinhauser;Carola Lehle

  • Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict

    Claudia Danielmeier;Jan R. Wessel;Marco Steinhauser;Markus Ullsperger

  • Distinguishing Response Conflict and Task Conflict in the Stroop Task: Evidence From Ex-Gaussian Distribution Analysis

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Error-related brain activity and adjustments of selective attention following errors.

    Martin E. Maier;Martin E. Maier;Nick Yeung;Marco Steinhauser

  • Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

    David Dignath;Andreas B. Eder;Marco Steinhauser;Andrea Kiesel

  • Stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances adaptive cognitive control: A high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation study

    Oyetunde Gbadeyan;Katie McMahon;Marco Steinhauser;Marcus Meinzer

  • Cognitive Control Under Stress How Stress Affects Strategies of Task-Set Reconfiguration

    Marco Steinhauser;Martin Maier;Ronald Hübner

  • Error awareness as evidence accumulation: effects of speed-accuracy trade-off on error signaling

    Marco Steinhauser;Marco Steinhauser;Nick Yeung

  • On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts.

    Ronald Hübner;Torsten Futterer;Marco Steinhauser

  • Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types

    Martin Maier;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Safety, Tolerability, Blinding Efficacy and Behavioural Effects of a Novel MRI-Compatible, High-Definition tDCS Set-Up

    Oyetunde Gbadeyan;Marco Steinhauser;Katie McMahon;Marcus Meinzer

  • Effects of emotions on driving behavior

    Klara Steinhauser;Felix Leist;Kathrin Maier;Vera Michel

  • Response-based strengthening in task shifting : evidence from shift effects produced by errors

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Errors can elicit an error positivity in the absence of an error negativity: Evidence for independent systems of human error monitoring.

    Francesco Di Gregorio;Martin E. Maier;Marco Steinhauser

  • The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making

    Anja Achtziger;Carlos Alós-Ferrer;Sabine Hügelschäfer;Marco Steinhauser

  • Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: what is more effortful?

    Carola Lehle;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Modeling Behavioral Measures of Error Detection in Choice Tasks : Response Monitoring Versus Conflict Monitoring

    Marco Steinhauser;Martin Maier;Ronald Hübner

  • Burdens of non-conformity: Motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations.

    Roland Pfister;Robert Wirth;Katharina A. Schwarz;Marco Steinhauser

  • Monitoring and control in multitasking

    Stefanie Schuch;David Dignath;Marco Steinhauser;Markus Janczyk

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Hübner
Ronald Hübner University of Konstanz
Marcus Meinzer
Marcus Meinzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Katie L. McMahon
Katie L. McMahon Queensland University of Technology
Andrea Kiesel
Andrea Kiesel University of Freiburg
Wilfried Kunde
Wilfried Kunde University of Würzburg
Markus Janczyk
Markus Janczyk University of Bremen
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Markus Ullsperger
Markus Ullsperger Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in psychology opens the door to several rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many students interested in psychology consider social work due to its close connection to mental health, counseling, and community support. However, pursuing a social work career in the USA involves meeting specific educational and licensure requirements that differ from state to state.

For example, the requirements to be a social worker in Tennessee include completing an accredited social work program and passing a state-specific exam. Similarly, understanding the Texas social work education requirements is crucial if you plan to practice in Texas, as the state mandates coursework in specific areas and supervised clinical hours.

Some states, like Utah, highlight particular academic requirements and supervised practice, as outlined in the requirements to be a social worker in Utah. Vermont has its own unique pathway, detailed in the Vermont social work education requirements, which also emphasizes continuing education.

Exploring online degrees in psychology or social work can help meet these diverse state requirements, giving you the flexibility to launch a meaningful and impactful career in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Steinhauser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles