World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3686
World Ranking
11214
National Ranking
543

Ronald Hübner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Hübner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ronald Hübner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Hübner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald Hübner is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sensory systems, and visual arts and performing arts.

The main topics of Hübner's research include:

  • Aesthetic perception and analysis
  • Color perception and design
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • Creativity in education and neuroscience
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Evolutionary psychology and human behavior
  • Art history and market analysis

Hübner has authored several recent papers covering diverse aspects of psychology and cognitive science. Notable works include:

  • "Why people press 'like': A new measure for aesthetic appeal derived from Instagram data." (2020), published in Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • "The Relations of Empathy and Gender to Aesthetic Response and Aesthetic Inference of Visual Artworks" (2022), published in Empirical Studies of the Arts
  • "Improving parameter recovery for conflict drift-diffusion models" (2020), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "A toolbox for calculating quantitative image properties in aesthetics research" (2025), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "On the difficulty of overcoming one's accuracy bias for choosing an optimal speed-accuracy tradeoff." (2021), published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Frequent collaborators in their research include Gregor U. Hayn-Leichsenring, Michel D. Druey, Annabelle Walle, Emily Sophie Ufken, and Katja Thömmes.

Among the journals where Hübner regularly publishes are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • i-Perception
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Hübner's research integrates quantitative methodologies and theoretical frameworks to explore human perception, particularly in the context of aesthetic experience and decision-making processes related to sensory input and social behavior.

Best Publications

  • A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention.

    Ronald Hübner;Marco Steinhauser;Carola Lehle

  • Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

    Matthias M. Müller;Ronald Hübner

  • Distinguishing Response Conflict and Task Conflict in the Stroop Task: Evidence From Ex-Gaussian Distribution Analysis

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Cognitive Control Under Stress How Stress Affects Strategies of Task-Set Reconfiguration

    Marco Steinhauser;Martin Maier;Ronald Hübner

  • The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences

    Ronald Hübner

  • On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task.

    Carola Lehle;Ronald Hübner

  • On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study.

    Gregor Volberg;Ronald Hübner

  • Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

    Ronald Hübner;Michel D. Druey

  • The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance : evidence for learned basic features

    Peter Malinowski;Ronald Hübner

  • On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts.

    Ronald Hübner;Torsten Futterer;Marco Steinhauser

  • Monetary reward increases attentional effort in the flanker task

    Ronald Hübner;Jan Schlösser

  • Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types

    Martin Maier;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets

    Carola Lehle;Ronald Hübner

  • Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict

    Michael Dambacher;Ronald Hübner

  • The integration of object levels and their content: a theory of global/local processing and related hemispheric differences.

    Ronald Hübner;Gregor Volberg

  • Response-based strengthening in task shifting : evidence from shift effects produced by errors

    Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task

    Ronald Hübner;Lisa Töbel

  • Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: what is more effortful?

    Carola Lehle;Marco Steinhauser;Ronald Hübner

  • Attention shifting between global and local target levels: The persistence of level-repetition effects

    Ronald Hubner

  • The effect of response competition on functional hemispheric asymmetries for global/local processing.

    Ronald Hübner;Peter Malinowski

  • Can the Spotlight of Attention be Shaped Like A Doughnut

    Matthias M. Muller;Ronald Hubner

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Steinhauser
Marco Steinhauser Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Matthias M. Müller
Matthias M. Müller Leipzig University
Gisela Trommsdorff
Gisela Trommsdorff University of Konstanz
Andreas Keil
Andreas Keil University of Florida
Thomas Gruber
Thomas Gruber Osnabrück University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a range of specialized careers. One growing area is counseling, particularly for those interested in supporting individuals facing addiction. Students who pursue online psychology degrees often find paths leading to substance abuse counseling, where demand is strong and opportunities to make a difference are plenty.

If you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Toledo, you can expect to navigate local licensure requirements and gain practical experience. For those considering the Southwest, it's helpful to review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Tucson, as state and city regulations may differ.

Similarly, individuals aspiring to serve communities in Oklahoma should explore substance abuse counselor requirements in Tulsa to understand local expectations. Those thinking about the East Coast can investigate substance abuse counselor requirements in Virginia Beach. Each region has unique pathways, but an online psychology degree can provide foundational knowledge for all.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald Hübner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles